Fresno Unified School District Awarded $13 Million in Punitive Damages in Bad Faith Insurance Suit Against Coregis Insurance Company.Business Editors FRESNO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 10, 2000 A 12-member jury awarded the Fresno Unified School District Fresno Unified School District (also known as F.U.S.D.) is a school district in Fresno, California, U.S.A. Facts and Figures
FUSD Fontana Unified School District (Fontana, CA, USA) FUSD Flagstaff Unified School District (Flagstaff, AZ, USA) FUSD Fremont Unified School District ) $13 million in punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. on October 6, 2000 in its bad faith insurance suit against Coregis Insurance Company (Coregis), a GE Capital Company, and subsidiary of General Electric Co. (NYSE NYSE See: New York Stock Exchange :GE). Judge Michael S. Ullman presided over the trial which began September 20, 2000 in Sacramento Superior Court. On October 2, 2000, Plaintiff's Motion for Directed Verdict A procedural device whereby the decision in a case is taken out of the hands of the jury by the judge. A verdict is generally directed in a jury trial where there is no other possible conclusion because the side with the Burden of Proof has not offered sufficient evidence to was granted, and the FUSD was awarded $972,000 in damages. FUSD was represented by Stephen D. Lucas and Albert E. Haverkamp, with the San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay. law firm of Lucas, Mullany, Boyer & Haverkamp. Fresno Unified School District v. Coregis Insurance Company, Case No. 99AS00773. "Coregis denied insurance coverage to the Fresno Unified School District," explained Stephen D. Lucas, "even though it knew for a fact that its policy with the District covered discrimination claims. To add insult to injury, Coregis tried to hide from the District the fact that it had litigated and lost similar suits on the issue of coverage on claims made by school districts in San Diego County." Faced with discrimination claims in 1994 and 1996, the FUSD requested that Coregis defend the cases under its insurance policy. The company took the position that it did not have to defend or indemnity Plaintiff because all discrimination claims involved intentional conduct. Coregis ignored prior adverse court rulings finding coverage for discrimination claims, and, instead, continued issuing the same blanket form letter denying the claims in both matters. San Diego based California Institutional Insurance Agency (CIIA CIIA Certified International Investment Analyst CIIA Canadian Institute for International Affairs CIIA California Internet Industry Alliance CIIA Christmas Island Internet Administration Ltd ) was the exclusive broker/wholesaler of the policy issued by Coregis, a national insurer of school and water districts. In 1988, FUSD renewed its policy with Coregis, purchasing Endorsement CIIA-81 for an additional premium of $7,000 to provide defense and indemnity coverage against discrimination claims. Contrary to the intent of Endorsement CIIA-81, Coregis steadfastly refused to defend or indemnify To compensate for loss or damage; to provide security for financial reimbursement to an individual in case of a specified loss incurred by the person. Insurance companies indemnify their policyholders against damage caused by such things as fire, theft, and flooding, which other California school districts in discrimination cases. "Justice has been served," stated Albert E. Haverkamp "The jury saw right through Coregis' ploys to deny insurance coverage to the District, sending a loud and clear message through their $13 million punitive damage award that it will not tolerate such egregious conduct. The verdict also sends a wake up call to risk managers to be especially vigilant in reviewing the coverage provisions under their policies." NOTE TO EDITORS: Defendant was represented by Marc Wolfe with Bollinger, Ruberry & Garvey, Chicago, IL.; telephone: 312/466-8000. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion