Printer Friendly

Freshwater wetlands protection upheld.

A Dec. 4 Supreme Court ruling has upheld the federal government's right to regulate -- even prohibit -- development of freshwater wetlands. The case involed a suburban builder in Michigan that attempted to fill in 80 acres of marsh, near a lake, in preparation for construction of anew housing development. The Army Corps of Engineers objected, saying that such landfilling operations required a permit from them. The builder refused, claiming that the Corps -- traditionally charged with maintaining navigable waters -- had no jurisdiction over these wet lands. But in a unanimous opinion, the court ruled that "the evident breadth of congressional concern for protection of water quality and aquatic ecosystems suggests that it is reasonable for the Corps to interpret the term 'waters' to encompass wetlands adjacent to waters as more conventionally defined."
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:by Supreme Court
Publication:Science News
Date:Dec 21, 1985
Words:130
Previous Article:Chinese nuclear pact signed.
Next Article:Radiation exposure at the Crossroads.
Topics:


Related Articles
Wetlands litigation resolved.
Wetlands in chaos.
Wetlands accounting - all wet?
Wetlands, waterfowl, and the menace of Mr. Wilson: commerce clause jurisprudence and the limits of federal regulation.
WORK AND PROGRESS.
Arson attacks ruled terrorism.
FDA embraces stealth tort 'reform' in proposed OTC drug rules.
More questions about punitive damages.
In student harassment case, N.J. court holds schools to high standard.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters