Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,677,471 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Freeman v. Berge.


U.S. District Court

SEPARATION

LIGHTING

EXERCISE

Freeman v. Berge, 283 F.Supp.2d 1009 (W.D.Wis. 2003). An inmate challenged the conditions of his confinement. The district court granted qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S.  to the defendants, finding that depriving an inmate of sensory stimulation sensory stimulation,
n in acupuncture, the practice of inserting needles into skin and tissue to coax the body into using its energy to heal itself.
 or social interaction did not violate the inmate's clearly established rights. The inmate alleged he was denied access to the outdoors, was subject to 24-hour lighting and audio and video-monitoring. The court noted that agreement among mental health professionals regarding the deleterious effects of solitary confinement solitary confinement n. the placement of a prisoner in a Federal or state prison in a cell away from other prisoners, usually as a form of internal penal discipline, but occasionally to protect the convict from other prisoners or to prevent the prisoner from causing  did not translate into legal notice that the defendants may have been violating the Eighth Amendment. (Supermax Correctional Facility, Boscobel, Wisconsin Boscobel is a city located in the Driftless Zone, in Wisconsin's Grant County. Approximately 0.6 mi. (1 km) to the north of the city, across a riparian swamp, is the Wisconsin River. U.S. Highway 61 crosses the Wisconsin River at Boscobel. )
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:cruel and unusual punishment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3WI
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Words:111
Previous Article:Wilson v. Vannatta.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Nelson v. Campbell.(cruel and unusual punishment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Beardslee v. Woodford.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Sanders v. Kingston.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Freeman v. Berge.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Freeman v. Berge.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Booth v. King.(ACCESS TO COURT)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Booth v. King.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Brief Article)
Booth v. King.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Booth v. King.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Christopher v. Buss.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Chandler v. Crosby.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles