Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,497,195 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Former Andersen partner speaks out.


Barry Melancon's Letter From the President (JofA, Jul.05, page 8) is self-serving and misleading. One might wonder why a retired Andersen partner and former chairman of the AICPA AICPA

See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
 Tax Section (that would be me) would be critical of that letter or express anything but appreciation for the AICPA's assistance in the recent Supreme Court case, which overturned Andersen's criminal conviction.

Andersen committed no crime, and in fact followed professional standards, in removing extraneous papers from the files.

The letter points out that

The Supreme Court vindication of Andersen is "a bittersweet bittersweet, name for two unrelated plants, belonging to different families, both fall-fruiting woody vines sometimes cultivated for their decorative scarlet berries.  victory" for all 28,000 ex-Andersen employees (and, I'd add, partners);

The AICPA filed an amicus curiae brief Noun 1. amicus curiae brief - a brief presented by someone interested in influencing the outcome of a lawsuit but who is not a party to it
brief, legal brief - a document stating the facts and points of law of a client's case
 supporting Andersen's successful position; and

None of us can ever know how Andersen would have fared "without the criminal verdict."

So, what is my problem with the AICPA and with Mr. Melancon's letter? The AICPA's actions were too little and much too late. The indictment of the firm, not the conviction, brought Andersen down. I cannot recall, and have been unable to find, evidence of expressed AICPA support for AA and opposition to the indictment at a time when they might have had some actual impact. I understand the AICPA did many things behind the scenes, but I would have preferred more public support at the time.

Mr. Melancon's letter seems to be an attempt to take credit on behalf of the AICPA for its recent actions that may have helped Andersen achieve its 9-0 Pyrrhic victory Pyrrhic victory

a too costly victory; “Another such victory and we are lost.” [Rom. Hist.: “Asculum I” in Eggenburger, 30–31]

See : Defeat
. The reason for filing the amicus brief was that "other CPAs might be subject to the statute that laid the foundation for the government's case." But how will that help other CPAs whose firms might be destroyed by a mere decision to indict in·dict  
tr.v. in·dict·ed, in·dict·ing, in·dicts
1. To accuse of wrongdoing; charge: a book that indicts modern values.

2.
 the firm?

Press reports indicate that KPMG KPMG Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (accounting firm)
KPMG Kaiser Permanente Medical Group
KPMG Keiner Prüft Mehr Genau (German)
KPMG Kommen Prüfen Meckern Gehen
 escaped immediate indictment largely based on the lessons learned in Andersen. If the Supreme Court decision helps present and future firms, that is commendable, but the AICPA's failure to speak out when it might have really made a difference to Andersen and its personnel is deplorable.

Leonard Podolin, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000.  

Haverford, Pa.
COPYRIGHT 2005 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Podolin, Leonard
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Nov 1, 2005
Words:348
Previous Article:Technology column gets an A.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:The right tools.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
High bid favored in heated battle to win major city contract. (parking ticket contract)
Don't wait for heroes to emerge at Enron. (Commentary).(Brief Article)(Column)
SCHOOL BOARD WARY OF DECEIT SOFTWARE FIRMS USE SAME NAME.(News)
DISTRICT SET TO REVIEW ANDERSEN CONTRACTS.(News)
NEWS LITE : A HAPPY ENDING FAIRY-TALE AUTHOR'S 1859 LETTER DISCOVERED.(NEWS)
Veteran's departure leaves management gap at SBS. (Media).
Global's former finance officer testifies on 'swap' transactions. (Trading Places--Accounting After Andersen).(Brief Article)
System needs more than band-aids. (Letters).
Ex-Andersen accountant sues over non-compete agreement. (Up Front).(Ray Edwards, former senior tax manager in Arthur Andersen LLP's Los Angeles...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles