Flurry of lobbying reform affects defense industry.Congress with a frenzied frequency is introducing government reform legislation. Proposals are labeled "lobbying reform," "accountability in contracting," "clean contracting," "anti-profiteering" and "honest leadership" --all aimed at ending what some members allude to allude to verb refer to, suggest, mention, speak of, imply, intimate, hint at, remark on, insinuate, touch upon see see, elude as the culture of corruption "Culture of corruption" is a political slogan used by the United States Democratic Party to refer to a series of political scandals affecting the Republican Party during George W. Bush's second term as President of the United States. in Washington. Myriad proposals will never pass. Those that do will likely be modified substantially beforehand. Nevertheless, the defense industry and others engaged in Washington policymaking pol·i·cy·mak·ing or pol·i·cy-mak·ing n. High-level development of policy, especially official government policy. adj. Of, relating to, or involving the making of high-level policy: inevitably will be affected. While corporate leaders do not necessarily need to become experts in the nuances of House and Senate rules governing gift giving, lobbying laws, or similar legislative ethics matters, they should stay abreast of developments on these issues to assess the propriety of conduct by company employees and outside lobbyists, and to address potential risks where they exist. House and Senate internal rules govern appropriate behavior by members of Congress and their staff. Based upon recent measures, increased compliance requirements Compliance requirements are a series of directives established by United States Federal government agencies that summarize hundreds of Federal laws and regulations applicable to Federal assistance (also known as Federal aid or Federal funds). have also been imposed on lobbyists and those companies that employ them. Compliance with those rules will ensure that serious, potentially criminal violations will not occur. This year, the House amended its gift and privately-sponsored, officially-connected travel rules. As to gifts, in most instances House rules previously permitted members or employees to accept a gift valued at less than $50. Now however, even this exception is unavailable if the gift comes from a registered lobbyist or agent of a foreign principal, or from a private entity that retains or employs registered lobbyists or agents of a foreign principal. Thus, members and staff may no longer accept gifts, such as meals or tickets to a sporting event, from a registered lobbyist, or any entity that retains or employs such a lobbyist, including in-house corporate lobbyist staff.. This ban extends to corporate staff outside the lobbying group if the gift in question is to be reimbursed or otherwise paid for by the corporation. Exceptions to this bar on gifts from lobbyists and companies that employ them include free attendance (including food and refreshments) at a "widely attended event," as defined in the rules. Food or refreshments of a nominal value Nominal Value The stated value of an issued security that remains fixed, as opposed to its market value, which fluctuates. Notes: When referring to fixed-income securities, the nominal value is also the face value. , such as appetizers, coffee, juice, or pastries offered other than as part of a meal at receptions and similar events also fall outside of the ban. Items of a nominal value--greeting cards, baseball caps, or T-shirts--similarly are still permitted, as are gifts based on a genuine personal friendship, gifts from a relative, informational materials, commemorative plaques, and donations of "home state products" for display or free distribution. The House also modified its travel rules, imposing new restrictions on lobbyist sponsorship, accompaniment, or planning of most trips by members and staff. Like the amended gift rules, the new travel rules ban the acceptance of travel or travel expenses from private entities (including nonprofits) that retain or employ a lobbyist. An exception for "one day events" (including travel and a single overnight stay) permits sponsorship from a private source that retains or employs a lobbyist, but lobbyist accompaniment is barred under this exception. Lobbyist participation must also be negligible or otherwise inconsequential in·con·se·quen·tial adj. 1. Lacking importance. 2. Not following from premises or evidence; illogical. n. A triviality. to the overall planning and purpose of a one-day trip. The House rules still generally permit sponsorship of travel, including multiple-day event trips, from any sponsor other than a lobbyist or private entity that retains or employs them. But all privately-funded travel must now be approved by the House Ethics Committee ethics committee A multidisciplinary hospital body composed of a broad spectrum of personnel–eg, physicians, nurses, social workers, priests, and others, which addresses the moral and ethical issues within the hospital. See DNR, Institutional review board. and pre-travel certification by the trip sponsor is required. Post-travel disclosures by members and staff is also required. In reviewing travel requests, the Ethics Committee will determine whether a trip is related to official duties and the reasonableness of the travel expenses. The disclosure essentially states that the trip will not be financed in any part by a lobbyist, that the source does not retain or employ a lobbyist, and the traveler will not be accompanied by a lobbyist. While most of these are internal House rules applying to members their staff, no company in good standing wants to jeopardize relationships or reputations. Furthermore, the pre-travel certifications, which trip sponsors are obliged to provide, may be subject to federal criminal law that imposes sanctions for knowingly making material false statements to the government. Like the House, the Senate also banned gifts and meals from lobbyists or from entities that hire lobbyists, and restricted travel sponsored by private entities. Beyond amending its own internal gift and travel rules, the Senate also approved the "Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act There are a number of piece of legislation known as the Accountability Act:
NDIA NDIA National Defense Industrial Association NDIA New Doha International Airport (Qatar) ETHICS COMMITTEE Joe Reeder, Chairman Attorney, Greenberg Traurig Greenberg Traurig LLP is an international law firm with approximately 1,700 attorneys and governmental professionals in 29 locations in the United States, Europe and Asia. Its presence in Europe is supplemented by strategic alliances with Olswang (offices in London, United Kingdom LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol Thomas Culligan Tofie M. Owen, Jr. Senior Vice President for Corporate Development, SAIC SAIC - http://saic.com. John D. Illgen Vice President, Northrop Grumman Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) is an aerospace and defense conglomerate that is the result of the 1994 purchase of Grumman by Northrop. The company is the third largest defense contractor for the U.S. Simulation Technologies Corporation Lawrence Skantze Gen., USAF (Ret.) W. John Stoddart Executive Vice President and President Defense, Oshkosh Truck Oshkosh Truck NYSE: OSK, is a manufacturer of specialty trucks and truck bodies for defense, industrial and fire emergency applications. It is based in Oshkosh, Wisconsin and employs about 7,000 people worldwide in five countries. Corporation James McAleese Principal, McAleese & Associates Dr. Vincent J. Ciccone President & CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. , RASco Inc. Steven Talkovsky Crowell & Moring LLP Richard D. McConn President, M International Inc. David Hickey For the writer of same name, see . David Hickey is a Gaelic football player for Dublin. Hickey has been awarded two all-stars for Dublin in 1974 and 1976. He won the All-Ireland Senior Football Championship with Dublin on three occasions in 1974, 1976 and again in 1977. is an attorney with the Greenberg Traurig law firm. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and are not intended to provide legal advice or represent the view of NDIA or the NDIA Ethics Committee. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion