Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,498 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Flag burning.


THE FLAG-BURNING ISSUE is a sign of our peculiar times. In an earlier day, the common-sense social sanction against flag-burning would have sufficed. Someone burning the flag would have defined himself as a crank and been invited out of town, or maybe tarred and feathered. One would have no more burned the flag than walked nude down Pennsylvania Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue is a street in Washington, D.C. joining the White House and the United States Capitol. Called "America's Main Street," it is the location of official parades and processions, as well as protest marches and civilian protests.  to protest the lack of day care. But social sanctions have become enfeebled en·fee·ble  
tr.v. en·fee·bled, en·fee·bling, en·fee·bles
To deprive of strength; make feeble.



en·feeble·ment n.
, partly because of the destructive 1960s; and any day now the Supreme Court may declare that walking nude down Pennsylvania Avenue is protected by the right to petition The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page.
 the government for redress of grievances.

Congress has been sculpting sculpting Cosmetic surgery The surgical reshaping of a tissue. See Deep tissue sculpting, Facial sculpting.  legislation on flag burning. The Court will probably reject it as unconstitutional under the First Amendment. If the Court strikes down the flag-burning legislation, several options are open.

A constitutional amendment strikes us as overkill overkill Vox populi An excess of anything . Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, however, gives Congress the power, by simple majority vote, to remove any matter from the jurisdiction of the Court. At some point, Congress is going to have to reassert the "deliberate sense of the people" against a Court acting on abstract "rights." This would be a good occasion to recover self-government.
COPYRIGHT 1990 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:proposal that Congress remove flag burning from jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Publication:National Review
Date:Jun 11, 1990
Words:203
Previous Article:The bailout. (background of savings and loan failures traced to administration of Jimmy Carter)
Next Article:Walker Percy, RIP. (obituary)
Topics:



Related Articles
Burn, baby, burn! (flag burning case)
The Court and the flag decision. (column)
Blast! (Congress declines to pass constitutional amendment against flag desecration) (column)
Democrat of the breakfast table. (reform movement in Eastern Europe, flag-burning controversy) (editorial)
First amendment wrongs. (argument that flag burning is not free speech) (editorial)
Burning issue. (argument that law prohibiting flag burning should be removed from jurisdiction of Supreme Court using Article III, Section 2 of the...
Burn the flag? Well, no.(Column)
Flag desecration amendment is just the beginning, backer tells newspaper.(PEOPLE & EVENTS)(Brief Article)
We think that the Supreme Court got it wrong when it ruled that the First Amendment protects flag burning.(The Week)(Brief article)
Should flag burning be illegal?(Debate)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles