Fitch Downgrades 2 Classes Of Bleecker Structured Asset Fund Ltd.Business Editors NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 21, 2003 Fitch Ratings Fitch Ratings An international rating agency for financial institutions, insurance companies, and corporate, sovereign, and municipal debt. Fitch Ratings has headquarters in New York and London and is wholly owned by FIMALAC of Paris. downgrades two classes of notes issued by Bleecker Structured Asset Fund Ltd (Bleecker). The following rating actions are effective immediately: -- Class A-1 floating-rate notes affirmed at 'AAA', removed from Rating Watch Negative; -- Class A-2 floating-rate notes affirmed at 'AAA', removed from Rating Watch Negative; -- Class B floating-rate notes to 'BBB' from 'AA', removed from Rating Watch Negative; and -- Class C fixed-rate notes to 'B' from 'BBB', removed from Rating Watch Negative. The transaction, a collateralized bond obligation Collateralized Bond Obligation (CBO) Investment-grade bonds backed by a collection of junk bonds with different levels of risk, called tiers, that are determined by the quality of junk bond involved. (CBO CBO See: Collateralized Bond Obligation. ), is supported by a diversified portfolio of asset-backed securities (ABS), residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS RMBS Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities RMBS Rambus, Inc. (NASDAQ stock symbol) RMBS Russian Mortgage-Backed Securities ) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS CMBS See: Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities ). The class A-1, A-2, B and C notes were placed on Rating Watch Negative on Apr. 24, 2003. Fitch has had discussions with the Clinton Group, Inc. (Clinton), the asset manager, regarding the current state of the portfolio and asset management strategy. Fitch has reviewed the credit quality of the individual assets comprising the portfolio and has conducted cash flow modeling of various default timing and interest rate scenarios. As a result, Fitch has determined that the original ratings assigned to the class B and C notes of Bleecker no longer reflected the current risk to noteholders. The rating actions are based on a number of factors including substantial downward rating migration in the credit quality of the portfolio and a reduction in excess spread. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the March 2003 trustee report, the transaction was failing the Fitch weighted average rating factor (WARF WARF Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation WARF Wide Aperture Research Facility WARF Wartime Active Replacement Factors WARF weighted-average risk factor WARF Wartime Attrition and Replacement Factors WARF Whylie Animal Rescue Foundation ) test. The Fitch WARF was 27 (or approximately 'BB+') for the period ended March 28, 2003. This exceeds the max WARF limitation of 17.00 (between 'BBB' and 'BBB-'). The portfolio contains a number of securities whereby default is a real possibility, although no defaults have occurred to date. Fitch believes these factors have negatively impacted the expected performance of the transaction to the point where the available credit enhancement Credit Enhancement A method whereby a company attempts to improve its debt or credit worthiness. Notes: Credit enhancements take many different forms. An example of a credit enhancement would be conversion rights added on to a debt instrument in order to lower the issuing levels no longer support the original ratings. Approximately 22% of the collateral pool is currently rated in the non-investment grade category, including 15% rated 'CCC' or below. Bleecker holds a number of securities that Fitch has identified as having a potential for adverse impact on the ability of the CBO to pay ultimate interest and ultimate principal on the class B and C notes. One area where the portfolio has experienced significant credit deterioration is manufactured housing transactions. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion