First-Use Folly.For fifty years, this magazine has opposed the nuclear arms race The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear weapons between the United States and Soviet Union and their respective allies during the Cold War. During the Cold War, in addition to the American and Soviet nuclear stockpiles, other countries also developed . But that race goes on, as does Washington's willingness to use nuclear weapons--and to use them first. This has been central U.S. and NATO NATO: see North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO in full North Atlantic Treaty Organization International military alliance created to defend western Europe against a possible Soviet invasion. doctrine since the dawn of the Cold War: If the Soviet Union had sent ground troops into West Germany West Germany: see Germany. , NATO commanders would have been authorized to rain down the nukes. It was an immoral policy from the start, since it threatened a nuclear world war. But now, almost ten years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, whatever justification--no matter how immoral--for that policy is now obsolete. Germany understands this. The new coalition government of Greens and Social Democrats suggested in November that NATO should rescind To declare a contract void—of no legal force or binding effect—from its inception and thereby restore the parties to the positions they would have occupied had no contract ever been made. rescind v. its first-use doctrine. The German dissent, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. The Washington Post, "shocked and angered the Clinton Administration Noun 1. Clinton administration - the executive under President Clinton executive - persons who administer the law ," and German officials, under heavy pressure from Washington, began to backtrack. The U.S. government has dreamed up new purposes for nuclear weapons now that they are no longer needed to deter the Soviet Union. The current favorite is to threaten to use them against any country that might deploy chemical or biological weapons. But the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. has plenty of might at its disposal without leaping the firewall and hurling nuclear weapons at much weaker nations. By upholding the first-use doctrine, the United States makes the world a more dangerous place. It increases the possibility of an accidental launch of the world's most horrendous weapons. It gives nonnuclear non·nu·cle·ar adj. 1. Not causing, involving, or operated by nuclear energy. 2. Not possessing nuclear weapons. countries and near-nuclear countries a strong incentive to join the club. And, above all, it further antagonizes the nationalists in Russia. They know that the NATO doctrine was originally aimed at Moscow, and they may fear that Moscow may yet be in the cross hairs. With the instability that is roiling Russia right now, the United States should be doing whatever it can to make sure that a new Cold War does not erupt--or worse, a nuclear conflict. That is the real threat to our security. Brandishing the nuclear sword at this delicate moment can only exacerbate that threat. To make the world a safer place, the United States must renounce the use of nuclear weapons. As Albert Einstein wrote on January 22, 1947: "The basic power of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow nationalisms. For there is no secret and there is no defense; there is no possibility of control except through the aroused understanding and insistence of the peoples of the world." |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion