Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,573,802 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

First-Use Folly.


For fifty years, this magazine has opposed the nuclear arms race The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear weapons between the United States and Soviet Union and their respective allies during the Cold War. During the Cold War, in addition to the American and Soviet nuclear stockpiles, other countries also developed . But that race goes on, as does Washington's willingness to use nuclear weapons--and to use them first.

This has been central U.S. and NATO NATO: see North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
NATO
 in full North Atlantic Treaty Organization

International military alliance created to defend western Europe against a possible Soviet invasion.
 doctrine since the dawn of the Cold War: If the Soviet Union had sent ground troops into West Germany West Germany: see Germany. , NATO commanders would have been authorized to rain down the nukes. It was an immoral policy from the start, since it threatened a nuclear world war. But now, almost ten years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, whatever justification--no matter how immoral--for that policy is now obsolete.

Germany understands this. The new coalition government of Greens and Social Democrats suggested in November that NATO should rescind To declare a contract void—of no legal force or binding effect—from its inception and thereby restore the parties to the positions they would have occupied had no contract ever been made.


rescind v.
 its first-use doctrine. The German dissent, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 The Washington Post, "shocked and angered the Clinton Administration Noun 1. Clinton administration - the executive under President Clinton
executive - persons who administer the law
," and German officials, under heavy pressure from Washington, began to backtrack.

The U.S. government has dreamed up new purposes for nuclear weapons now that they are no longer needed to deter the Soviet Union. The current favorite is to threaten to use them against any country that might deploy chemical or biological weapons. But the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  has plenty of might at its disposal without leaping the firewall and hurling nuclear weapons at much weaker nations.

By upholding the first-use doctrine, the United States makes the world a more dangerous place. It increases the possibility of an accidental launch of the world's most horrendous weapons. It gives nonnuclear non·nu·cle·ar  
adj.
1. Not causing, involving, or operated by nuclear energy.

2. Not possessing nuclear weapons.
 countries and near-nuclear countries a strong incentive to join the club. And, above all, it further antagonizes the nationalists in Russia. They know that the NATO doctrine was originally aimed at Moscow, and they may fear that Moscow may yet be in the cross hairs. With the instability that is roiling Russia right now, the United States should be doing whatever it can to make sure that a new Cold War does not erupt--or worse, a nuclear conflict.

That is the real threat to our security. Brandishing the nuclear sword at this delicate moment can only exacerbate that threat.

To make the world a safer place, the United States must renounce the use of nuclear weapons. As Albert Einstein wrote on January 22, 1947: "The basic power of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow nationalisms. For there is no secret and there is no defense; there is no possibility of control except through the aroused understanding and insistence of the peoples of the world."
COPYRIGHT 1999 The Progressive, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Progressive
Date:Jan 1, 1999
Words:417
Previous Article:The Psyche of Empire.(President Clinton's unilateral decision to bomb Iraq was constitutionally questionable)(Brief Article)(Column)
Next Article:The Doomsday Strategy.



Related Articles
Still here.
Intellectual Property.(Brief Article)
Firm's Digital Fingerprint Guards Documents.(Brief Article)
New products in the legal field.
Protecting Fort Knox.(FirstUse.com, Fort Knox Escrow Services Inc.)(Brief Article)
FAILURE TO FABLED, CUB'S FOLLY HAS SEEN IT ALL.(Sports)
DIGITAL L.A. : MAKING THE SMART MOVES; FIRSTUSE.COM OFFERS PROTECTION FOR YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.(L.A. LIFE)
THEATER/SNEAK PEEK : DAVIDSON PUTTING `WILL'-POWER INTO HIGH GEAR.(L.A. LIFE)
Pop Art ... when is a pavilion not a pavilion?(pavilion design created by Rem Koolhaas)
World's first inflatable folly.(RIBA Enterprises and Fashion Architecture Taste creates a structure)(Brief article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles