First We Take Manhattan, Then We Take Berlin: Bonhoeffer's New York.

In Harlem, Bonhoeffer learned about the improvisation of jazz, the contingency of the blues, and the liberation of black spirituals. That's not all he learned.

They sentenced me twenty years of boredom for trying to change the system from within.

I'm coming now

I'm coming to reward them.

First we take Manhattan then we take Berlin.

--Leonard Cohen 

By 1930 Dietrich Bonhoeffer had completed his doctorate at the University of Berlin, Friedrich Schleiermacher's University. However, by then had grown suspicious of Schleiermacher's Gefuhl, that deep, romantic religious feeling that so characterized cultured, nineteenth-century theological through. Even Bonhoeffer had his doubts, not because he lacked religious feeling, but because a certain melancholia drew his gaze again and again to that ugly ditch another nineteenth-century thinker called, "the infinite qualitative difference between the human and the diving."

Bonhoeffer was the son of a liberal, humanistic, yet aristocratic German home. This home was also well aquatinted with sorrow, Young

Dietrich had been deeply saddened by the death of his eldest brother Walter in the First World War. Dietrich was given Walter's autographed Bible at his confirmation. Another brother, Karl-Friedrich, had come home from the Western Front wounded, cursing militarism and the motherland, questioning God, and reading aloud to the family large passages from Ludwig Feuerbach. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer began his theological studies he learned of what theologian Karl Barth called a "black day" in early August 1914 when ninety-three German professors, some of them prominent theologians, announced their support of the war policy of Wilhelm II. It seemed to Barth and his circle that theology had become little more than a mirror of nineteenth-century German culture. [1]

It is therefore not surprising that Bonhoeffer found himself desiring something other, something different, something more. As he pondered the ugly ditch of European history, it is not surprising that early in his academic career he was drawn to Karl Barth's dialectical construction of God: a God who is Wholly Other, Ganz Anders. Like Barth, Bonhoeffer hoped that the vast distance between the human and the divine could be measured although never shortened through thick tomes of dogmatic theology. Yet even Barth knew that the angels would one day laugh at such a theology.

At the time Bonhoeffer thought the ugly ditch of history that so tormented his soul was the emblem of the infinite qualitative difference between the human and the divine. Only later would he see that he was looking deep into what Cornel West has called the gorge caused by the tragedies and terrors of this ghastly century. Only later would he understand that the Other has a human face. Only later would he turn from normative ethics to aesthetics; only later would he move from metaphysics, morality, and a dogmatics underwritten by a positivism of revelation to a theopoetics. But that is later.

The University of Berlin was also the university of Karl Bonhoeffer, Dietrich's father, the distinguished professor of psychiatry and neurology and the most prominent psychiatrist in the city. Karl was very disappointed by Dietrich's decision to become a Lutheran pastor-theologian. Why would his gifted son choose a churchly vocation that would likely promise an uneventful life? Bonhoeffer's dear friend and biographer, Eberhard Bethge, answers the question this way: "Dietrich became a theologian because he was lonely." [2]

The lonely theologian chose for his dissertation topic, Sanctorum Communio -- The Communion of Saints. Bonhoeffer became an earnest churchman and he believed in the communion of saints. His curiosity, and his consciousness that the communion of saints was large, much larger than the civil religion of German Christendom, led him to catch a steamer named the Columbus, bound for America. After the Columbus docked in New York, Bonhoeffer soon found his way up Broadway to 121st Street and entered the gate of Union Theological Seminary, an institution that had a reputation of being somewhat avant-garde, if theology can ever be avant-garde!

Bonhoeffer came to Union as a post-doctoral student and teaching fellow for the 1930--31 academic year. He came to do serious theology. He did not understand at the time that it would be a poetics of place and an entanglement with people that would produce this serious theology. He didn't know then that the best theology is often that which comes before the text and in front of the text. Walter Benjamin, Jewish literary critic and philosopher, lived across town from the Bonhoeffers in Berlin. Dietrich and Walter never met. If they had, Benjamin would have likely told Bonhoeffer, "In the fields with which we are concerned, knowledge exists only in lightening flashes. The text is the thunder rolling along afterward." [3] Like Benjamin, Bonhoeffer would later see that it was the literary fragment -- the letter, the paper, the poem, the story, not the systematic manuscript--that best reflected traces of the lightening flash.

As a pastor-theologian, Bonhoeffer was eager to take a course from the Detroit socialist preacher who had come to Union only two years earlier. As a public intellectual and prophet to politicians, the socialist preacher, Reinhold Niebuhr, taught "Applied Theology." Bonhoeffer was prepared for Niebuhr's political theology and American pragmatism but he was nevertheless surprised by the syllabus Niebuhr distributed to the students. The course was titled, "Ethical Viewpoints in Modern Literature." For Bonhoeffer, it was the beginning of an ethics instructed by aesthetics. Bonhoeffer did theology in conversation with James Weldon Johnson's Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man, W.E.B. Du Bois's The Souls of Black Folks, and the collected poetry of Langston Hughes and Countee Cullen, poets of the Harlem Renaissance. With an emerging analogical imagination, Bonhoeffer entered the creative space between heaven and earth, nature and grace, saint and sinner, self and other as he began to consider Niebuhr' s experiment o f viewing theology and ethics as a kind of writing. This was perhaps the first class in an American seminary to turn to literature as a source for doing applied theology.

Not only did Bonhoeffer learn of another America through reading the writers of the Harlem Renaissance, he began to ponder what the New York black evangelist Tom Skinner was fond of calling "the blackness of the Gospel." Countee Cullen's collection Copper Sun was on the Union class syllabus and in the poem, "Colors," Bonhoeffer read: "The play is done, the crowds depart; and see/ That twisted tortured thing hung from a tree,/ Swart victim of a newer Calvary./ Yea, he who helped Christ up Golgotha's track,/ That Simon who did not deny, was black." [4] Reflecting years later on the poetry of Cullen, Bonhoeffer commented on "the black Christ" being led into the field against "a white Christ" by a young Negro poet revealing to us the deep cleft in the church of Jesus Christ. [5] Indeed, Cullen's narrative poem, "The Black Christ," has a rather astonishing conclusion. As the story of a racist lynching develops, the subject position of a black man who is lynched by whites for his love of sensuality, the spring, an d a white woman is assumed, in the end, by Christ. [6]

As at least part of his quest for the communion of saints Bonhoeffer formed several close friendships at Union. Here I can only mention two of his good friends: Jean Lasserre, a French Reformed pastor, and Franklin Fisher, an African-American divinity student. Jean Lasserre was French Reformed yet almost Tolstoyan in his religious and ethical vision. In terms of H. Richard Niebuhr's classic typology of Christian religion, he fit the "Christ against culture" paradigm. He was an unapologetic Christian pacifist who identified the essence of the faith as ethical and embodied concretely in discipleship, community, and peace. His book, War and the Gospel, was published by the Mennonite Publishing House, and its style and substance is reflected in Bonhoeffer's work, The Cost of Discipleship: "When Jesus calls a man he bids him to come and die." There is no cheap grace here, and little tolerance for the plurality and ambiguity of human nature beyond the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. Discipleship calls the true believer to crucify the flesh and inhabit the strange new world of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount.

Bonhoeffer was very drawn to Lasserre's ethical zeal. He had found a true saint in Jean Lasserre. This unqualified call to the costly grace and radical discipleship was for Bonhoeffer totally other, and he liked it. Lasserre took Dietrich to see the film All Quiet on the Western Front and it greatly disturbed him. He left the New York theater shaken and more deeply committed to the path of Christian pacifism. [7] Soon, Bonhoeffer made a trip across America with Lasserre in an old Buick that ended at an ecumenical peace conference in Mexico. There the Frenchman and the German spoke together on discipleship and peace. Dietrich would never forget Jean.

When Dietrich's father learned of their planned trip across the United States, he warned them not to stay in the City of New Orleans. He knew of malaria on the Gulf Coast yet perhaps as a psychiatrist he also knew what Tennessee Williams later would teach us. In the City of New Orleans, there is a place where the line of the streetcar named Desire intersects with the line of the streetcar named Cemeteries. To understand this is to understand a great deal. Dietrich and Jean didn't go to New Orleans but later, much later, Dietrich would encounter the meeting of eros and thanatos, desire and death, and it would do important things to his theology.

Franklin Fisher grew up in Birmingham, Alabama. He was the son of a Black Baptist minister who was also dean of the theology department of Alabama's Selma University. Franklin, or Frank, as his friends called him, did his B.A. at Howard College, now Howard University. There he became interested in the Harlem Renaissance. He came to New York to study theology, but also to explore Harlem, and he took his new German friend Dietrich along with him. Bonhoeffer became a regular attender of Harlem's Abyssinian Baptist Church and for six months taught the boys Sunday school class and helped with various youth clubs there. Once, Pastor Adam Clayton Powell, Sr. yielded his pulpit to this young, German Lutheran pastor.

At Abyssinian, Bonhoeffer sat under the ministry of Powell almost weekly for over six months. Powell's culturally engaged sermons blended the artful rhetoric and congregational, noncreedal style of the black Baptist church with the best of American social pragmatism. Powell had learned to appreciate John Dewey through their work together at the NAACP. We have recently learned through the research of Ralph Garlin Clingan that some of Bonhoeffer's theological vocabulary was borrowed from the pulpit work Pastor Adam Clayton Powell, Sr. For example, Powell complained that the problem of the Euro-American dhurch was "cheap grace." [8] The problem of cheap grace -- grace without the price of following after Jesus -- of course, became a central focus of Bonhoeffer's Discipleship. The phrase, "world come of age," a familiar and frequently debated concept in Bonhoeffer's prison letters was used by Powell in his preaching: "The world come of age asks only one question: What can you do to make the world happy? What can you do to uplift humanity?" [9]

Frank Fisher introduced Bonhoeffer to both sacred and secular Harlem, not that the two could always be easily pried apart. As a pastor, Bonhoeffer spoke of the Black church with uncharacteristic feeling. As a classical pianist, Bonhoeffer was very interested in the music. He found it strange and other yet he was fascinated by it. At Harlem, it seems, Bonhoeffer began to learn about the improvisation of jazz, the contingency of the blues, and the liberation of black spirituals. Much later in his intellectual and spiritual development he applied a musical rather than a biblical or ethical metaphor to the task of theology: polyphany. Theology, Bonhoeffer suggested, is neither a neat harmony nor a mere symphony, but it is a polyphony. A polyphony in this context is a musical piece in which two or more different melodies come together in a satisfying way. According to Bonhoeffer, the church's cantus firm us, its fixed traditional melody, must remain in place yet invite the addition and innovation of other voices into the flow of the music. The introduction of this metaphor into his theology marked a movement in his thought from the imitation motif of The Cost of Discipleship or Nachfolge to the more improvisational style of his later works, such as Ethics and Letters and Papers from Prison. [10]

Bonhoeffer was intrigued by the music and culture of New York but he hated its racism. He became a smart and sensitive critic of American racism and this attention to racism seemed to deepen his critiques of German anti-Semitism. He discussed this problem freely with his brother Karl-Friedrich, who had studied at Harvard on a physics fellowship. KarlFriedrich concluded that the problem of racism in the United States was so terrible that he could never imagine raising a family in America. Hitler had of course not yet ascended to power in Germany. Racism was the American problem for any person of conscience, Dietrich's older brother concluded. Dietrich seemed to agree. It was in New York that this German Lutheran theologian first began to truly understand the issues of racism and nationalism as serious theological problems.

Josiah Ulysses Young III has recently published the first book-length study of Bonhoeffer and the problem of racism. No Difference in the Fare brings Bonhoeffer's theology into very creative conversation with African-American theology and culture. Young shows how the attention to alterity, otherness or difference in Bonhoeffer's theological work, contributed to a profound social understanding of the relationship of the self to the other that fostered respect in spite of radical difference. [11] The other, Bonhoeffer suggests, in the I-Thou relationship presents us with the same problem of cognition as does God. The Thou of the other -- the neighbor, the friend, the stranger -- is analogous to the divine Thou. Thus, one must resist projecting an easy sameness or harmony upon the other and encounter or receive him or her as a "Thou," outside of any centered or self-present conception of the "I." This I-Thou or I-You encounter becomes crucial not only for understanding the other but also for understanding the s elf. Authentic relationality must be grounded in the recognition of uniqueness and separateness, Bonhoeffer argues. He then asserts, "The individual becomes a person ever and again through the other, in the moment." [12] Bonhoeffer's experience in Harlem helped him translate the heavenly categories of transcendence into relational expressions of worldly holiness.

At the end of 1931 it was time for Bonhoeffer to return to his old intellectual center: Berlin. So he packed up his books and Paul Robeson records and returned home. For the next couple of years he was a lecturer at Berlin as well as a chaplain and pastor. In 1933 Adolf Hitler became Reich Chancellor of Germany with the support of many German Christians. While other pastors were writing sermons and other theologians were occupied with classical Christological questions, Bonhoeffer went on the air and strongly criticized the rise of Fascism in a radio address that was cut off by the authorities before it was completed. He was the first pastor to offer such a public protest. This was only the beginning of Bonhoeffer's troubles with the Reich, and thus he found the invitation to leave Berlin to pastor the German Lutheran congregations in London from 1933 to 1935 too inviting to decline. He continued his resistance work in ecumenical circles there while remaining in close contact with his colleagues and family i n Berlin.

By 1935 in Germany it was necessary for the Confessing Church opposing Hitler to establish a seminary in exile. Bonhoeffer was called from London by the Confessing Church to return to Germany and head the resisting seminary at Finkenwalde. His book Life Together recalls this experiment of viewing the church as an alternative, counter-cultural community at a time when the German church and society were marching to the music of the Nazism. Bonhoeffer's students at Finkenwalde found his spirituality and theology challenging yet wondered about his strange musical tastes as they listened to the unfamiliar voice of Paul Robeson on the Victrola lament, plead, and prophesy: "Go down. Go down Moses! Way down in Egypt's land. Tell old, Pharaoh, Let my people go!" [13]

In April 1938, Bonhoeffer fell into deep despair when the majority of Confessing Church pastors -- his students, friends, and colleagues -- fearing for their lives and the lives of their families, took the oath of allegiance to the Fuhrer. Within two months there was Kristallnacht, the night of broken glass, and all Jewish businesses were liquidated by January. Hitler's totalitarianism now threatened all dissenters with punishment or death. In the Spring of 1939 Bonhoeffer caught a steamer back to New York, to the safety of Manhattan.

As he revisited New York, his Babylon, his Jerusalem, the world came of age and in his words, he "gathered up the past." He spent time with old friends and met new ones, including the poet W H. Auden. He spoke with them about the fate of the German Jews. He spoke with them about the fate of all German people under Fascism, his people. We have no record of his conversations with Auden but several years later Auden wrote a poem dedicated to Bonhoeffer entitled, "Friday's Child." [14] We do know this was the year that Auden was questioning his own politics and pacifism in face of the evolving European totalitarianism. He was keeping a notebook of aphorisms and reflections after his meditations on William Blake's The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. [15] Their conversation likely turned to models of resistance and to pacifism. One must wonder if Auden didn't raise the Blakean question of "fearful symmetry" with Bonhoeffer: "Did he who made the Lamb make thee [the Tyger]?" [16] Indeed, there was little tiger in the J esus of Bonhoeffer's Christology (and therefore neither in his theological anthropology) and there was much of the obedient, sacrificial lamb. As the poet and the pastor talked, one must wonder if Auden didn't confess to Bonhoeffer privately what he said in public over a year later, "I have absolutely no patience with Pacifism as a political movement, as if one could do all the things in one's personal life that create wars and then pretend that to refuse to fight is a sacrifice and not a luxury." [17]

Friends at Union worked to secure Bonhoeffer teaching positions at American colleges or seminaries so that he could remain in the United States even as he pondered what has now become the classic question of his life and witness, "Will the church merely gather up those whom the wheel has crushed or will it prevent the wheel from crushing them?" During the hot and humid July of 1939, his room at Union cluttered with cigarette butts and mounds of spent papers from too many unsuccessful writing attempts, Bonhoeffer decided to return to Berlin to join the active resistance to Hitler and the Third Reich. "Only he who cries out for the Jews may sing Gregorian chants!" [18] he would declare. He concluded that he would have no right to take part in the restoration of Germany after the war unless he shared with the people in the trials of the country's most horrible time in history.

He would later write these words to Eberhard Bethge describing his decision to enter fully and responsibly into the dramas of history on behalf of the other:

There remains an experience of incomparable value. We have for once learnt to see the great events of history from below, from the perspective of the outcast, the suspects, the maltreated, the powerless, the oppressed, the reviled -- in short from the perspective of those who suffer.... This perspective from below must not become the particular possession of those who are eternally dissatisfied; rather, we must do justice to life in all its dimensions from a higher satisfaction, whose foundation is beyond any talk of, "from below" or "from above." This is the way in which we may affirm it. [19]

This movement in Bonhoeffer's thought, I would suggest, signals the possibility of a transcendence without either classical metaphysics or an orthodox positivism of revelation; it is at once both a worldly and a spiritual transcendence. It is a naming of oneself and a rendering of God in history "as another" in an improvisational ethics called forth by the aesthetic encounter with the face of the other. Paul Ricoeur's Gifford Lectures are quite helpful in unpacking this point about alterity. Like Bonhoeffer, Ricoeur resists a Romantic notion of self-consciousness or God-consciousness. Ricoeur, who was himself a French prisoner of war from 1940 to 1945, contends that the shortest path of the self to itself lies in the speech of the other. Self-understanding therefore involves a long detour through narratives and encounters with others, with self-consciousness as the final destination, not the starting point. [20]

One can discern a movement in Bonhoeffer's religious and intellectual formation from the mimesis of discipleship to a more innovative poetics of obligation. In this worldly holiness Jesus truly becomes "the man for others." There has been much debate on precisely what Bonhoeffer really meant by his famous celebration of the advent of "religionless Christianity," [21] but there is little disagreement that there was an aesthetic turn in his life and work. [22] This can be seen in the texts of Bonhoeffer written between 1939 and 1945: the fragments of his incomplete Ethics which explore human desire alongside of Christian duty, his drama and fiction from prison, his love letters, and his many moving letters, papers, and poems from prison. Defining aesthetics as the artful, sensuous perception of reality, this turn is indeed striking and satisfying in Bonhoeffer's final works. [23] This aesthetic turn opened him to a faith that was polyphonic and multi-dimensional. Bonhoeffer celebrated its multiplicity in a let ter to Bethge:

Christianity puts us into many different dimensions of life at the same time; we make room in ourselves, to some extent, for God and the whole world.... [Life] is kept multi-dimensional and polyphonous. What a deliverance it is to be able to think, and thereby remain multidimensional. [24]

This kind of artful thinking led Bonhoeffer's theological reflections beyond the sacred text into the world of material culture. As the Greek term aisthesis implies, aesthetics takes one into the whole embodied realm of sensation and perception. [25] Aesthetics signals the body's long rebellion against the tyranny of static systems and totalitarian ideologies, even any attempted totality of theology and ethics. I love this expression of Bonhoeffer's incarnational desire from the Letters:

I should like to be tired by the sun, instead of by books and thoughts. I should like to have it awaken my animal existence-not the kind that degrades a man, but the kind that delivers him from the stuffiness and artificiality of a purely intellectual existence and makes him purer and happier. I should like, not just to see the sun and sip at it a little, but to experience it bodily. [26]

By 1943 Dietrich Bonhoeffer had been arrested and imprisoned for his part in a plan to kill Hitler. He wrote one of the most important theological fragments of the twentieth century in a lengthy letter from Tegel Prison dated July 21, 1944. He confesses that in the past year he has come to know and understand the "profound this-worldliness of Christianity." He writes that the Christian is not a homo religiosus, but simply a man, as Jesus was a man-in-contrast to John the Baptist. He then makes another startling contrast. He contrasts himself with his old friend Jean Lasserre:

I remember a conversation I had in America thirteen years ago with a young French pastor. We were asking ourselves quite simply what we wanted to do with our lives. He said he would like to become a saint (and I think it's quite likely that he did become one). At the time I was very impressed but I disagreed with, and said, in effect, that I should like to learn to have faith. For a long time I did not realize the depth of that contrast. I thought I could acquire faith by trying to live a holy life, or something like it. I suppose I wrote The Cost of Discipleship as an end of that path. Today I can see the dangers of that book, though I still stand by what I wrote ... I discovered later, and I'm still discovering right up to this moment, that it is only by living completely in this world that one learns to have faith.

When Bonhoeffer was arrested and imprisoned for his part in an active plot to assassinate Hitler he had acted with the sense that he was transgressing normative Christian morality on behalf of something other. Participation in an act of violent resistance was far from the biblical ethics of Christian pacifism that he and Lasserre had preached in Mexico. Bonhoeffer came to understand that to love the neighbor is to accept some responsibility for the neighbor's history. He insisted that he accepted this responsibility as a man, not as a saint, a priest, a righteous individual, or even a churchman. He accepted it in face of historical ambiguity and infinite mystery. He accepted it as one living and loving and thinking completely in this blessed fallen world. He acted in a faith beyond ethical correctness or dogmatic certitude.

Let me conclude this essay with one of his final poems. Art, like its closest analogue religion, must be both world confirming and world disconfirming. It must seek meaning and understanding by means of the exception and not merely by means of the rule. It must confront one as "other" yet also touch deeply some analogy of seeing, hearing, feeling, or thinking because human consciousness requires the art of connecting. It must probe both the dialectial imagination and the analogical imagination. In Bonhoeffer's life art possessed the sacramental power to turn theology into theopoetics:

WHO AM I?

Who am I? They often tell me

I would step from my cell's confinement

Calmly, cheerfully, firmly,

Like a squire from his country-house.

Who am I? They often tell me

I would talk to my warders

freely and friendly and clearly,

as though it were mine to command.

Who am I? They also tell me

I would bear the days of misfortune

Equably, smilingly, proudly,

Like one accustomed to win.

Am I then really all that which men tell of?

Or am I only what I know of myself,

Restless and longing and sick like a bird in a cage,

Struggling for breath, as though hands were compressing my throat,

Yearning for colours, for flowers, for the voices of birds,

Thirsting for words of kindness, for neighborliness,

Trembling with anger at despotisms and petty humiliation,

Tossing in expectation of great events,

Powerlessly trembling for friends at an infinite distance,

Weary and empty at praying, at thinking, at making

Faint, and ready to say farewell to it all?

Who am I? This or the other?

Am I one person today, and tomorrow another?

Am I both at once? A hypocrite before others,

And before myself a contemptibly woebegone weakling?

Or is something within me still like a beaten army,

Fleeing in disorder from victory already achieved?

Who am I? They mock me, these lonely questions of mine.

Whoever I am, thou knowest, O God, I am thine. [27]

On the 9th of April, 1945, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was executed at Flossenburg Concentration Camp only days before its liberation. He was hanged by the Nazis. He was thirty-nine years old. I would like to think that in the end there was no great chasm to cross. I would like to think that in the end, in the dark beauty of worldly holiness, for Bonhoeffer the Infinite and the intimate become one. [28]

SCOTT HOLLAND is a contributing editor to Cross Currents.

Notes

(1.) The Bonhoeffer-Barth relationship has often been discussed and debated in the theological guild. The most comprehensive treatment may be found in the new book by Andreas Pangritz, Karl Barth in the Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000).

(2.) Eberhard Bethge's classic biography of Bonhoeffer has recently been expanded by the author and released in a newly revised edition. Dietrich Bonhoeffer: A Biography (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000). Bethge's full statement on the lonely theologian is as follows: "With some exaggeration, it might be said that because he was lonely he became a theologian, and because he became a theologian he was lonely" (37).

(3.) Benjamin as cited in Wayne Whitson Floyd, Jr., "Style and the Critique of Metaphysics: The Letter as Form in Bonhoeffer and Adorno," in Whitson and Charles Marsh, eds., Theology and the Practice of Responsibility: Essays on Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Valley Forge, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1994), 239-51. Stanley Cavell has recently commented on the philosophical or aesthetic importance of Walter Benjamin in his refusal (or inability) to become a systematic thinker. See Cavell, "Remains to be Seen: On The Arcades Project," Art Forum (April 2000) 31-35.

(4.) Countee Cullen, "Copper Sun," in Gerald Early, ed., My Soul's High Song: The Collected Writings of Countee Cullen (New York: Anchor Books, 1991), 145.

(5.) Dietrich Bonhoeffer, No Rusty Swords: Letters, Lectures and Notes, 1928-1936 (New York: Harper and Row, 1965), 112.

(6.) Countee Cullen, The Block Christ and Other Poems (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1929).

(7.) The best study of Bonhoeffer's movement to Christian pacifism is F. Burton Nelson's "The Relationship of Jean Lassere to Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Peace Concerns in the Struggle of Church and Culture," Union Seminary Quarterly Review 8, nos. 1-2 (1985): 71-84. Another important treatment of Bonhoeffer's struggle around peace and pacifism is Union Professor Larry Rasmussen's, Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Reality and Resistance (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1972).

(8.) Ralph Garlin Clingan, "Against Cheap Grace in a World Come of Age: A Study in the Hermeneutics of Adam Clayton Powell, 1865-1953, in His Intellectual Context." A Drew University Ph.D. dissertation (UMI Microfilm 9732791, Ann Arbor, Mich. 1997).

(9.) Adam Clayton Powell, Palestine and Saints in Caesar's Household (New York: Richard and Smith, 1939), 187.

(10.) Bonhoeffer discusses his application of polyphony to theology, ethics, and indeed life with great enthusiasm in his correspondence with Bethge. See Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, Enlarged Edition (New York: Macmillan, 1971), 302-12. The theme of improvisation (and polyphony) in music and how this musical method and metaphor can inform other disciplines is explored in an important special issue of the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58:2 (Spring, 2000).

(11.) Josiah Ulysses Young III, No Difference in the Fare: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Problem of Racism (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998). Bonhoeffer began the development of his theology and sociology of the social category of the I-Thou relationship in his dissertation.

(12.) Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Sanctorum Communio: The Theological Study of the Sociology of the Church (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1998), 55-56. This is the first volume in the newly translated works of Bonhoeffer, Wayne Whitson Floyd, Jr., General Editor. This philosophy of self and other of course makes one think of Martin Buber's I and Thou. Those familiar with the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas will note possible correlations. See especially Levinas, Alterity and Transcendence (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999].

(13.) Bonhoeffer wrote of his love of the Negro spirituals in No Rusty Swords, 109. Then he observes in dismay, "Negro singers can sing those songs before Packed concert audiences of whites, to tumultuous applause, while at the same time these same men and women are still denied access to the white community through social discrimination."

(14.) See Edward Mendelson, Later Auden (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999), 425-27.

(15.) This "notebook" was later published as W. H. Auden, The Prolific and the Devourer (Hopewell, N.J.: The Ecco Press, 1976).

(16.) William Blake, The Complete Poetry and Prose, Newly rev. ed., ed. David V. Erdman with commentary by Harold Bloom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), 24-25.

(17.) Auden, The Prolific and the Devourer, x.

(18.) Bethge, Bonhoeffer, 607.

(19.) Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, 17.

(20.) Paul Ricoeur, Oneself as Another (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).

(21.) The most recent study of this theme is Ralf K. Wustenberg, A Theology of Life: Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Religionless Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998].

(22.) The most interesting piece I have seen on this aesthetic turn is Carolyn M. Jones, "Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Letters and Papers from Prison: Rethinking the Relation of Theology and the Arts, Literature and Religion," Literature and Theology 9, no. 3 (September 1995): 243-59.

(23.) Within the past year new translations of both Bonhoeffer's poetry and fiction from prison have been published. See Edwin Robertson, ed. and trans., Voices in the Night: The Prison Poems of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999) and Clifford J. Green, ed., Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Fiction from Prison (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000), in the new series, Dietrich Bonhoeffer Collected Works, vol. 7. Also see Ruth-Alice Von Bismarck and Ulrich Kabitz, eds., Love Letters from Cell 92: The Correspondence Between Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Maria Von Wedemyer (Nashville: Abingdon, 1992).

(24.) Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, 310-11.

(25.) A good discussion of the evolution of the term aesthetics and its use in philosophy and theology can found in Richard Viladesau's new work, Theological Aesthetics: God in Imagination, Beauty and Art (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).

(26.) Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, 339-40.

(27.) Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison, 347-48.

(28.) Special thanks is due here to my friend and editorial colleague Catherine Madsen for insight into this graceful or theopoetic moment in which "the Infinite and the intimate become one."