Printer Friendly

Final regulations on dual consolidated loss.

The IRS issued final regulations on the dual consolidated loss provisions September of last year. The regulations replaced proposed and temporary regulations issued in September 1989.

Before section 1503(d) was enacted, multinational corporations attempted to take double deduc-. tions by establishing corporate entities that were residents of both the United States and a foreign jurisdiction. These entities typically generated losses through interest expense deductions. When the losses were consolidated, they offset income from affiliates in both jurisdictions.

In response to this "double dipping," section 1503(d) disallows the use of dual resident corporations' losses to offset any affiliated U.S. corporation's income. The regulations also broaden the definition of dual resident corporation to include certain partnerships and branches of domestic corporations that are "separate units."

The final regulations amend the temporary regulations' exceptions to the general rule disallowing the use of dual consolidated losses by adopting a "use" approach. Taxpayers are permitted to use a dual resident corporation's or a separate unit's dual consolidated loss if they certify the loss has not been (and will not be) used to offset another entity's income under the laws of a foreign country.

If this provision is violated, the taxpayer must recapture and report as gross income that portion of the loss used to offset the income of another entity under the foreign laws. An interest charge also will be imposed.

However, the final regulations continue to deny the use of dual consolidated losses where the relevant foreign jurisdiction adopts anti-abuse legislation.

Observation: By adopting the use rule, the final regulations do not penalize taxpayers with dual consolidated losses--provided the losses are not used in a foreign jurisdiction. However, the final regulations continue to penalize taxpayers if the relevant foreign jurisdiction restricts the use of dual consolidated losses.

Edited by Andrew R. Biebl, CPA, Biebl, Ranweiler & Co., New Ulm, Minnesota (small business); Robert Willens, CPA, senior vice president at Lehman Brothers, New York City (corporate); Marianne Burge, CPA, director of international tax services, Kenneth Kral, CPA, international tax partner, and William Abrams, CPA, senior associate, at Price Waterhouse, New York City (international).
COPYRIGHT 1993 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Abrams, William
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jan 1, 1993
Words:350
Previous Article:Closed-end fund tender offers escape adverse tax consequences.
Next Article:Foreign currency translation, EPS and ESOPs and alternative revenue programs of rate-regulated utilities.
Topics:


Related Articles
Proposed loss disallowance regulations.
Comments on revised loss disallowance regulations (T.D. 8294 and CO-93-90) January 23 1991.
Restrictions on the deductibility of U.K. branch losses.
Loss on disposition of stock disallowed unless statement is filed.
AICPA criticizes dual consolidated loss rules as unnecessarily restrictive.
Comments on IRS's 1993 Business Plan.
S corporation built-in gain tax.
Proposed regulations attack conversions of C corporations into exempt organizations.
Are the loss disallowance final regs. the final word?
Often-overlooked stock basis adjustments.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters