Female prisoners.
17. Female Prisoners
U.S. Appeals Court Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732 (9th Cir. 2002).
A class of prisoner's at a women's state prison
MEDICAL CARE who brought a [section] 1983 action against
prison officials moved to extend jurisdiction
over a consent decree for an additional period of
time, to have prison officials held in contempt,
and to compel discovery. The district court
denied the motions and granted the prison
officials' motion to terminate the consent
decree. The appeals court affirmed in part,
reversed in part, and remanded. The appeals court
found that dental care and mental health
conditions at the prison did not violate the
Eighth Amendment. The appeals court found that
officials' substantial compliance with the
consent decree judgment was an acceptable defense
to the prisoners' motion to hold the officials in
civil contempt for past violations of the decree.
The court remanded the case for reconsideration
of allegations that the officials failed to
comply with consent decree requirements regarding
medical care. (Washington Corrections Center for
Women)
U.S. District Court Turner v. Kight, 192 F.Supp.2d 391 (D.Md. 2002).
A female detainee who was arrested on an
SEARCHES outstanding warrant associated with a civil
matter and detained at a jail brought an action
MEDICAL CARE against county and state officials. The district
court granted summary judgment for the
defendants. The court held that arresting and
booking officers were deliberately indifferent to
the detainee's serious medical needs when they
allegedly removed a neck brace and seized
medication, ignoring her complaints of pain and
muscle spasm. The detainee sometimes limped and
walked with a cane, but the court found that the
detainee's alleged pain did not rise to the level
of a serious medical need. The court granted
qualified immunity to the officers, finding that
there was no indication that the officers
actually knew of, and ignored, a serious need for
medical care. The court also found that the
officers were not deliberately indifferent by
failing to dispense medication in response to the
detainee's complaints of pain, where the officers
were not permitted to dispense medication and
they notified the detention facility's medical
staff of a nonemergency situation, who did not
respond during the six hours the detainee was
confined. The court held that the detainee's
allegation that she was brutally handcuffed did
not present a constitutional violation,
particularly in the absence of any explanation of
how the handcuffing led to any injury. The court
held that if a strip search was conducted by an
officer of the same sex during the processing of
the detainee, it did not rise to the level of a
Fourth Amendment violation, where the search was
conducted in private and there was no physical
contact between the detention officer and the
detainee. (Montgomery County Detention Center,
Maryland)
COPYRIGHT 2002 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion