Feds in the Classroom: How Big Government Corrupts, Cripples, and Compromises American Education.Feds in the Classroom: How Big Government Corrupts, Cripples cripples see osteomalacia. , and Compromises American Education. Neal P. McCluskey (Rowman & Littlefield). In this volume, the Cato Institute's Neal McCluskey has penned an energetic attack on all things federal in K-12 schooling. He sets out to "lay bare the history of American education" and "the incursion in·cur·sion n. 1. An aggressive entrance into foreign territory; a raid or invasion. 2. The act of entering another's territory or domain. 3. of ever-bigger government into our nation's classrooms" and then offers something of a greatest hits compendium com·pen·di·um n. pl. com·pen·di·ums or com·pen·di·a 1. A short, complete summary; an abstract. 2. A list or collection of various items. : going after the Elementary and Secondary Education Act “Title I” redirects here. For other uses of "Title I", see Title I (disambiguation). The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Pub.L. 89-10, 79 Stat. 77, ) is a United States federal statute enacted April 111965. , busing, the creation of the Department of Education, America 2000, and No Child Left Behind. He points out that the U.S. Constitution envisions no federal role in education, decries judicial activism Noun 1. judicial activism - an interpretation of the U.S. constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation can legitimately influence judicial decisions (particularly decisions of the Supreme Court) broad interpretation in schooling, and closes by recommending more local control and school choice. He calls for dismantling the Department of Education, shifting the department's Office for Civil Rights to the Department of Justice, eliminating various federal education programs, and either zeroing out federal education-related expenditures or converting them to block grants. The volume provides a pedestrian but useful summary of the case against federal hubris--one that is timely as we debate the reauthorization of NCLB NCLB No Child Left Behind (US education initiative) . While the tone is a bit strident and the sourcing disappointingly reliant on the readily Internet-accessible, McCluskey reminds readers why well-intentioned calls for federal leadership and shiny plans for national programs can ultimately prove treacherous. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion