Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,547,637 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Federal Spending Up-Way Up-Under President Bush


During his State of the Union Address last month, President George W. Bush called on Congress to be "good stewards of tax dollars" and touted his administration's actions to slow the rate of growth of non-security discretionary spending. Bush went on to claim that his newest budget will "save the American taxpayer another $14 billion next year" and urged lawmakers to "confront the larger challenge of mandatory spending, or entitlements" because the "retirement of the Baby Boom generation will put unprecedented strains on the federal government." Bush lamented Congress's failure to fix Social Security and pointed out that "by 2030, spending for Social security, Medicare, and Medicaid alone will be almost 60% of the entire federal budget."

The Heritage Foundation has issued a report by Brian Riedl titled "Federal Spending: By the Numbers" (available at www.heritage.org) revealing that not only is federal spending up under Bush, but it has grown twice as fast as it did under President Bill Clinton. For example, Riedl points out that federal spending has increased by 33% since 2001, from $1.863 trillion to $2.472 trillion, which translates to almost $22,000 per household, the highest level since World War II.

Riedl's data show that discretionary spending increases were generally small in the 1990s. But since 2001 discretionary spending has jumped 49%.

Bush's call for action on the "challenge" of entitlements was well received by conservatives, but the administration's record on entitlement growth is not encouraging. Riedl's report reveals that unreformed entitlement programs are continuing to grow, having hit a record 10.8% of GDP, and are projected to double over the next decade. One of the leading factors in the projected growth in mandatory spending is Bush's Medicare drug entitlement, which will add $8.1 trillion in unfunded liabilities over 75 years-more than double that of Social Security ($3.7 trillion).

© 2006 Human Events Publishing, Inc. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2006 Human Events
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Anonymous
Publication:Human Events
Date:Feb 27, 2006
Words:315
Previous Article:Did UAE Save Bin Laden?
Next Article:Ledeen: Push Democratic Revolt in Iran



Related Articles
Who's the biggest spender? Did the federal government spend more under George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, or George W. Bush? The record may surprise...
Bloated Bush budget.(Correction, Please!)(Correction Notice)
Wretched excess.(concerns over excessive federal expenditures; Medicare funding)
The president's birth tax.(Editorials)(Another borrow-and-spend federal budget)(Editorial)
Spending away our future: despite modest cuts in some government programs, the Bush administration's proposed budget for 2007 will continue to add to...
Bush likens Democratic lawmakers to `a teenager with a new credit card'
Katrinafying Minnesota's Disaster
Legacy of debt
Congress Packs Highway Bill With Pork
Line-Item Veto: Why Wait?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles