FUTURE LOOKS BRIGHT, POLL SAYS; AMERICANS UPBEAT ABOUT NATION, LIVES.Byline: James James, person in the Bible James, in the Gospel of St. Luke, kinsman of St. Jude. The original does not specify the relationship. James, rivers, United States James. A. Duffy Duffy is a surname of Irish origin. It comes from the original Irish name Ó Dubhthaigh, meaning descendant or grandson of Dubhthach. Dubhthach was an Old Irish first name meaning "Dark one". Knight Ridder
Knight Ridder (IPA: /ˈrɪdɚ/) was an American media company, specializing in newspaper and Internet publishing. Newspapers Despite the recent political turmoil, most Americans are very pleased with the state of the union and are increasingly positive about the country's future and their own, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. a new national survey released Tuesday Tuesday: see week. by the Gallup Organization. Americans were more optimistic op·ti·mist n. 1. One who usually expects a favorable outcome. 2. A believer in philosophical optimism. op than they have been at any of seven points in the past when the Gallup Organization made similar measurements, starting in 1964. Most said they expect their lives to be better in five years than they are now. Some 85 percent of Americans described themselves as generally satisfied with the way things were going in their personal lives. That number has risen steadily since the 1980s, Gallup experts said. The polling organization surveyed 5,001 adults between April 23 and May 31. The results have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. The telephone polling was done before the international financial crisis disrupted dis·rupt tr.v. dis·rupt·ed, dis·rupt·ing, dis·rupts 1. To throw into confusion or disorder: Protesters disrupted the candidate's speech. 2. the growth trend in the stock market, but after the Monica Lewinsky Monica Samille Lewinsky (born July 23, 1973) is an American woman with whom the former United States President Bill Clinton admitted (after initially denying) to having had an "inappropriate relationship"[1] while Lewinsky worked at the White House in 1995 and 1996. scandal rocked the White House and the nation. More Americans do worry about the country becoming increasingly divided between haves and have-nots. But only 39 percent agree the division actually exists. Twenty-four percent of Americans describe themselves as have-nots who worry about household finances most or all of the time, and see their money situation as worse than their parents', Gallup found. That is an increase from a 1988 Gallup study in which 17 percent of those questioned described themselves as have-nots. Those who feel this way are, predictably, those with low incomes and limited education, the study found. The proportion of Americans describing themselves as haves also has increased since 1988 - from 59 percent to 67 percent. There were increases in both categories because the proportions of those surveyed who saw themselves as neither or who were uncertain declined. More people today - compared with 1990 - believe the number of people who live in poverty is decreasing, while the proportion who are rich is increasing. Most of those questioned were reluctant to describe themselves as either rich or poor. Some 61 percent said they were middle income, while just 12 percent described themselves as rich and 27 percent said they were poor. Only about one in seven Americans said they were saving enough for retirement, while one in five said they are not saving at all. Ninety-one percent of those polled said they do not ``think poverty will ever be done away with in this country.'' ``The public clearly expects the government to be involved in helping to improve the situation of the have-nots in society, mainly through education and job training,'' the study reported. The report also found that Americans are more troubled that poverty exists than they are disturbed by the existence of disproportionate dis·pro·por·tion·ate adj. Out of proportion, as in size, shape, or amount. dis pro·por wealth. Eighty-one percent of those polled said there is ``plenty of opportunity and everyone who works hard can go as far as they want.'' More than half of Americans polled - 52 percent - said they do not have computers in their home. Sixty-three percent of those asked said they do not use the Internet Internet Publicly accessible computer network connecting many smaller networks from around the world. It grew out of a U.S. Defense Department program called ARPANET (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network), established in 1969 with connections between computers at the or other computer online services. HAVES vs. HAVE-NOTS Some key numbers Key Numbers® A system devised by West Group involving the classification of legal subjects that are organized within their publications according to specific topics and subtopics. from a Gallup social survey released Tuesday on haves and have-nots. The phone survey of 5,001 people, conducted April 23 to May 31, has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points: If you had to choose which of these groups you are in, the haves, or the have-nots? Haves 67 percent, have-nots 24 percent, neither 6 percent. How often do you worry that your total family income will not be enough to meet your family's expenses or bills all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or almost never? All/most of the time - April-May 1998, 21 percent; June 1989, 26 percent; January 1987, 31 percent; January 1984, 35 percent; January 1976, 26 percent. Would you say that the percentage of Americans who are rich is increasing from year to year or decreasing from year to year? Increasing - 74 percent in 1998, 65 percent in 1990. CAPTION(S): box Box: Haves vs. have-nots (see text) |
|
||||||||||||||||

pro·por
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion