Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,678,647 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

FEDERAL COURT EXPEDITES BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY V. MICROSOFT CORP. ANTITRUST LAWSUIT WITH JUNE 1, 1999 TRIAL DATE.


DANBURY, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 31, 1998--

Court Finds Antitrust Standing and Denies Motion to Dismiss or

Deliver Summary Judgement Noun 1. summary judgement - a judgment rendered by the court prior to a verdict because no material issue of fact exists and one party or the other is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law  

Bristol Technology Inc., leader in cross-platform development, will meet Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ NASDAQ
 in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations

U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on
: MSFT MSFT Microsoft (stock symbol)
MSFT Movimento Sociale Fiamma Tricolore (Italy)
MSFT Multi-Stage Fitness Test
MSFT Master of Science in Family Therapy
MSFT Macalester Students for Fair Trade
) in Federal Court on June 1, 1999. Federal Judge Janet C. Hall's December 30 ruling granted Bristol several key points that will prevail at trial, including demonstrated antitrust standing and a substantial likelihood that it will prove antitrust injury at trial.

"Microsoft continues to try to obfuscate To make unclear or confuse. See obfuscator and e-mail obfuscator.  the facts to attract attention away from the central issue, which is the anticompetitive an·ti·com·pet·i·tive  
adj.
That discourages competition among businesses: anticompetitive foreign trade restrictions. 
 behavior of a monopolist. While the judge denied the injunction, her Memorandum of decision foreshadows victory for Bristol," explains Keith Blackwell, CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board.  of Bristol Technology. "We are thrilled with a June 1, 1999 trial date and the judge's findings of antitrust standing."

"The judge recognized that Bristol has made an important contribution to the viability of UNIX UNIX

Operating system for digital computers, developed by Ken Thompson of Bell Laboratories in 1969. It was initially designed for a single user (the name was a pun on the earlier operating system Multics).
 as a competitor to Windows NT (Windows New Technology) A 32-bit operating system from Microsoft for Intel x86 CPUs. NT is the core technology in Windows 2000 and Windows XP (see Windows). Available in separate client and server versions, it includes built-in networking and preemptive multitasking. ," explains Patrick Lynch Patrick Lynch can refer to:
  • Patrick Lynch (bishop), Catholic bishop during the American Civil War
  • Patrick Lynch (auxiliary bishop), Roman Catholic Diocese of Southwark
  • Patrick C.
, partner at O'Melveny & Myers and lead counsel for Bristol Technology. "We believe a jury will agree that Microsoft has abused its monopoly power."

Antitrust Standing and Injury

While Microsoft has vigorously claimed that Bristol does not have standing because it is not a competitor of Microsoft, Judge Hall writes "However, based on the evidence before it at this time, the court finds that Bristol has clearly shown that it is indeed a competitor of Microsoft." Judge Janet Hall also writes, "Bristol has thus shown a substantial likelihood that it will be able to prove antitrust injury at trial."

Irreparable Harm

In the Memorandum, Federal Judge Janet C. Hall established that there is likelihood of irreparable harm. "Moreover, there is ample evidence that Microsoft intended to harm Bristol with respect to limiting the effectiveness of its Wind/U product," she writes.

Microsoft Loses on Motion to Dismiss or For Summary Judgement

Judge Janet Hall also ruled on Microsoft's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgement, "The court DENIES the defendant's Motion in its entirety."

Case Background

In a lawsuit filed on August 18, 1998, in the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport, Conn., Bristol Technology is suing Microsoft for anticompetitive manipulation of the access to the Windows programming interfaces, that constitutes antitrust violations of the Sherman Act, as well as violations of Connecticut law. The trial is scheduled to commence on June 1, 1999.

About Bristol Technology

Headquartered in Danbury, Conn., Bristol Technology Inc. develops, markets, and supports the Wind/U family of Windows and UNIX cross-platform development products. Founded in 1991, the company was listed in the 1997 Inc. 500 as one of the fastest growing private companies in the United States. Its products also include HyperHelp(tm), software for creating UNIX-based on-line help systems with WinHelp functionality; Xprinter(tm), software for adding sophisticated printing capabilities to UNIX-based applications, and Jprinter(R), a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) Pronounced "wiz-ee-wig." It refers to displaying text and graphics on screen the same as they will print on paper or display on a Web page.  network printing system for Java. The company has a European subsidiary in Amersfoort, The Netherlands, and a development center in Bangalore, India.

(c) 1998 Bristol Technology Inc. Bristol Technology and Wind/U are registered trademarks of Bristol Technology Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Editors' Note: For more information on this suit, legal documents, press materials and background information, please visit Bristol's home page at http://www.bristol.com.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 31, 1998
Words:553
Previous Article:MLC Holdings Announces $100 Million of Financing Facilities; Company Initiates a $50 Million Line of Credit and a $50 Million CP-backed Facility.
Next Article:Faulding Receives Tentative FDA Approval for Labetalol Hydrochloride Injection.
Topics:



Related Articles
MICROSOFT UNDER PRESSURE AT TRIAL'S END -- BREAKUP ILLOGICAL?(Company Business and Marketing)
MICROSOFT APPEAL TICKING.(Company Business and Marketing)
APPEALS COURT REJECTS DELAY OF MICROSOFT CASE.(Company Business and Marketing)
IT'S MONOPOLYSOFT; JUDGE RULES MICROSOFT IS HURTING CONSUMERS.(News)
MICROSOFT TO ENTER CLOSED-DOOR MEETING IN MEDIATION PROCESS.(Business)
WINDOWS 98 HELD; MICROSOFT OKS DELAY; SUIT TALKS TO CONTINUE.(Business)(Statistical Data Included)
22 STATES, U.S. TAKE MICROSOFT TO COURT.(News)
ANTITRUST LAWS MOVING INTO CYBERSPACE; MICROSOFT, GOVERNMENT GO HEAD TO HEAD.(BUSINESS)
BUSINESS NOTES.(BUSINESS)
Should the computer king be dethroned? A court ruling could change the way Bill Gates does business. (business).(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles