Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,728,043 articles and books



See: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation


See Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
 TO PAY MAXXAM. MAXXAM Inc., Houston, Texas, USA announced that Judge Lynn N. Hughes, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas is the Federal district court with jurisdiction over the southern part of Texas and is a part of the Fifth Circuit. The court's headquarters is in Houston, Texas and has six additional offices in the district. , has ordered that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), an independent U.S. federal executive agency designed to promote public confidence in banks and to provide insurance coverage for bank deposits up to $100,000.  (FDIC) pay MAXXAM over US$ 72 million dollars in sanctions as measured by legal and other expenses incurred during its 10-year legal battle against the regulatory agency. MAXXAM's timber subsidiary, Pacific Lumber, owns about 205,000 acres of California timberlands.


The judgment represents the largest sanction against the Federal government and incorporates MAXXAM's requests that MAXXAM be reimbursed its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. MAXXAM filed a motion to sanction the FDIC for filing a law-suit that the FDIC's own legal division's internal analysis concluded had "at least a 70%" chance of failing on pretrial motions and, if it survived, the chances of prevailing on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers  were "marginal at best." The FDIC's standards call for at least a 50% chance of success before initiating legal action.

Prior to the FDIC lawsuit, the FDIC had paid off millions of dollars to the Office of Thrift Supervision The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) was established as a bureau of the Treasury Department in August 1989 as part of a major Reorganization Plan of the thrift regulatory structure mandated by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) (12 U.S.C.A.  (OTS See Office of Thrift Supervision. ) to initiate administrative action against MAXXAM, Texas-based businessman Charles Hurwitz (who controls 77% of MAXXAM), and others. The litigation that began 1995 sought US$ 821 million in restitution and civil money penalties. It ended when the OTS settled with MAXXAM and Hurwitz in October 2002 for $206,000; the respondents made no admission of wrongdoing.


The WorldWatch section in Solutions! magazine is written by Sara M. Scharpf, a writer based in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA. Contact her by email at
COPYRIGHT 2005 Paper Industry Management Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:INDUSTRY NEWS
Author:Scharpf, Sara M.
Publication:Solutions - for People, Processes and Paper
Date:Oct 1, 2005
Previous Article:In other IP news.
Next Article:Mohawk on EPA's Green List.

Related Articles
U.S. banks' insurance premiums lowered; SAIF institutions unchanged.
Real estate investors get wake-up call.
Speaking for the trees: the old-growth timber battle heats up. (Currents).
Speaking for trees.
Buyers's guide to thermoplastics.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters