Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,050 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

ExxonMobil to Appeal Reduced but Unwarranted Awards in Grefer Case.


IRVING, Texas -- While a Louisiana appeals court substantially reduced punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer.  against Exxon Mobil Corporation Exxon Mobil Corporation

U.S.-based oil and gas company formed in 1999 through the merger of Exxon Corp. and Mobil Corp. It has investments and operations in petroleum and natural gas, coal, nuclear fuels, chemicals, and ores.
 (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
:XOM XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation (stock symbol)
XOM X/Open Object Management
XOM OSI-Abstract-Data Manipulation API
XOM Xml Object Model
XOM X/Open Osi Abstract Data Manipulation
) in connection with a civil lawsuit yesterday, ExxonMobil acted responsibly in the Grefer matter and believes that the compensatory and punitive awards are still excessive and unjustified.

The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal reduced punitive damages from $1 billion to $112 million and left unchanged compensatory damages A sum of money awarded in a civil action by a court to indemnify a person for the particular loss, detriment, or injury suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of another.  of $56 million.

"Not only were punitive damages unwarranted because ExxonMobil acted responsibly but the court's ruling allows punitive damages for conduct that occurred long before the punitive damages statute took affect," said Exxon Mobil Corporation General Counsel Charles Matthews. "We are also disappointed that the court has upheld a jury award for a clean-up far in excess of that required by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality regulations. We intend to appeal this decision."

The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality had determined that the naturally occurring material on the Grefer property was not considered to be at dangerous levels and that it represented no threat to human health or the environment. The vast majority of the property has no elevated levels of contamination.

Less than one percent of the land contained material that was above regulatory limits. ExxonMobil developed and implemented handling and safety procedures years before the State of Louisiana CODE, OF LOUISIANA. In 1822, Peter Derbigny, Edward Livingston, and Moreau Lislet, were selected by the legislature to revise and amend the civil code, and to add to it such laws still in force as were not included therein.  issued regulations governing the naturally occurring material involved, and informed and educated employees and contractors about the issue. Approximately 99 percent of the Grefer property exhibited contamination levels equal to or less than what is found in most soil throughout Louisiana.

Nonetheless, ExxonMobil had always been fully prepared and willing to remediate the Grefer property to satisfy state requirements. In fact, ExxonMobil made such an offer to the Grefer family before the matter went to trial.

Former Louisiana Governor Mike Foster and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ LDEQ Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ) had filed an amicus brief supporting ExxonMobil's position regarding the applicability of LDEQ's standards.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:320
Previous Article:Nexstar Broadcasting Completes Refinancing.
Next Article:Harrah's Entertainment Wins Dalton Pen Awards for Communications Excellence.
Topics:



Related Articles
PARKS: APPEAL WILL BE A SUCCESS CHIEF STANDING BY HIS DECISION TO FIRE.
EDITORIAL : DRIVING HOME A POINT COURTS RETHINK WILDLY INFLATED PUNITIVE AWARDS.
COUNCIL RETHINKS APPEAL FEES.
States cap amounts of appeal bonds.
Kistler for high court.
Measure 35: Insurance caps a hotly contest issue.
Cutter v. Wilkinson.
Riley v. Kurtz.
Riley v. Kurtz.
Back to the brig.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles