Printer Friendly

Expenditures of urban and rural consumers, 1972-73 to 1985.

Expenditures of urban and rural consumers, 1972-73 to 1985 JOHN M. ROGERS

Social and economic comparisons of urban and rural populations have long been of interest to public policymakers. The migration of families between urban and rural areas, the financial problems of the American farmer, and the incidence of poverty by type of area are but a few of the urban versus rural topics that have received much attention.(1) This report focuses on another socioeconomic aspect of the urban and rural populations, namely, now the expenditure patterns of the two populations compare.(2) Expenditures, income, and family characteristics are compared for 1985, and changes in expenditure levels and expenditure shares between 1972-73 and 1985 are discussed using data from the Bureau of Labor statistics Consumer Expenditure (CE) Survey.

(1)See Kathleen K. Scholl, "Income and Poverty Rates: Farm and Nonfarm Residence," Family Economics Review, no. 10, 1983, pp. 16-19; and Department of Agriculture, Outlook for Farm Families: 1986," in U.S. Department of Agriculture, Outlook '86: Proceedings, Agriculural Outlook Conference, Dec. 4, 1985, pp. 275-88.

(2) Urban, as defined in this survey, includes the rural population within metropolitan areas.

Method of the expenditure survey. Both urban and rural consumer units were sampled when the current, ongoing CE Survey began in 1980.(3) However, because of Federal budget reductions, the rural portion of the sample was dropped in 1981-83. In January 1984, the Bureau reintroduced the rural portion of the population in the survey sample. Now that data for both the urban and rural populations are again available, it is possible to compare the epxenditures, income, and family characteristics of the two population groups. It also affords the opportunity of comparing recent urban versus rural data with earlier data.

(3)A consumeer unit comprises: 1) all members of a particular household related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legal arrangements; 2) a person living alone or sharing a household with others or living as a roomer in a private home or lodging house or in permanent living quarters in a hotel or motel but who is financially independent; or 3) two or more persons living together who pool their income to make joint expenditure decisions. For the purposes of this report, consumers and consumer units may be used interchangeably.

The CE Survey consists of two separate components, each with its own questionnaire and sample: 1) a quarterly Interview survey in which expenditures and income of consumer units are obtained in five interviews conducted every 3 months and, 2) a Diary of recordkeeping survey completed by consumer units for two consecutive 1-week periods. The Interview survey is designed to obtain data on the types of expenditures which respondents can recall for a period of 3 months or longer. In general, these include relatively large expenditures, such as automobile purchases, and those that occur on a regular basis, such as rent or utility payments. Including "global estimates" of spending for food, but 95 percent of expenditures are converted in the Interview survey. The Diary survey obtains data on small, frequently purchased items which normally are difficult for respondents to recall, such as detailed food expenses. Data cited in this report are from the Interview survey. Differences in expenditures and expenditure shares discussed here are based on population estimates rather than sample estimates.

Urban versus rural, 1985. Income and demographic data collected in the expenditure survey show differences between the urban and rural populations that help explain some of the differences in expenditures of the two groups. Table 1 shows estimates for 198-5, the most recent period for which data are available from the current survey, and for 1972-73, the reference period of the last expenditure survey prior to the start of the current, continuing survey. Percent changes in expenditures between the two periods are presented, and a column showing changes in the BLS Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) also is included so that changes in expenditures and prices can be compared. Comparisons for 1985 are discussed below while changes from 1972 - 73 to 1985 are examined in the following sections.

Rural consumer units accounted for about 16 percent of the total in 1985. However, the portion of the consumer units classified as rural varied substantially by region of the country. Almost 22 per cent of the units in the South were rural, compared with only 9 percent of this units in the West. About 19 percent of units in the Midwest region and 12 percent in the Northeast were in rural areas. The data also show that urban consumer units averaged higher incomes in 1985 than did their rural counterparts. Urban consumer units had slightly fewer members and were headed by persons about 2 years younger than heads of rural units. The numbers of earners, children under age 18, and persons over 65 were about the same of the two groups. Rural consumer units owned more vehicles per unit and were more likely to own their own homes. Total expenditures accounted for a larger proportion of total income of rural units than of urban units.

Expenditure levels of the two population groups showed substantial differences across expenditure components. As might be expected from their higher average incomes, urban consumer units had higher levels of total expenditures -- they spent about $3,600 more on average than did rural units in 1985. Higher food, housing, and apparel expenditures accounted for much of the difference. However, despite lower average incomes, rural consumer units spent more for transportation, health care, tobacco, and live and other personal insurance than did urban units.

Results show that, in 1985, urban consumer units spent more for housing than did their rural counterparts, and the amount spent accounted for a larger share of total expenditures than that of rural units. Expenditure shares, the percent of total expenditures spent on each component, are shown in table 2. Urban consumer units spent an average of $7,005, or 31 percent of their total expenditures, on housing compared to an average of $5,064, or 26 percent of the total, spent by rural units. A higher percentage of rural consumer units were homeowners and rural homeowners were more likely to have paid off their mortgages -- 38 percent having done so versus 21 percent of urban units. Despite lower total housing expenditures, rural units spent almost as much on fuels and utilities as urban units, $1,579 compared to $1661. These costs accounted for a larger share of rural consumers' housing costs than of urban consumers' -- 31 percent versus 24 percent. The higher share spent by rural consumer units may be partially explained by the fact that renter families frequently do not pay directly for fuels and utilities -- payments are included in the rent -- and a higher proportion of urban families are renter families.

Rural consumers spent a larger share of their total unit expenditures on the transportation, 25 percent versus 20 percent spent by urban consumers, due largely to higher expenditures for vehicles and gasoline. This is as expected, because rural consumers own more vehicles that do urban consumers -- 2.4 per consumer unit compared to 1.8 owned by urban consumers. Also, rural consumers probably drive longer distances than do urban consumers.

Rural consumers also spent more per unit on health care than did urban consumers -- $1,168 versus $1,011. This accounted for about 6 percent of rural consumers' total unit expenditures versus 4 percent of urban consumers' total. Higher health care expenditures by rural consumers can be attributed to their being older, on average, than urban consumers. Also, data from the survey show that rural consumer units more frequently paid the full cost of their health insurance policies while employers may frequently paid the costs of policies for urban consumers.

Changes from 1972-73 to 1985. There was little change between 1972-73 and 1985 in the proportion of the total population that was rural. The average size of the consumer unit and the average age of the consumer unit head decreased slightly for both urban and rural consumers over the period.

Increased expenditures for housing and transportation were primarily responsible for the overall increase in spending between 1972-73 and 1985 for both urban and rural consumer units. (See table 1.) Expenditures for some other components increased at a faster rate, but housing and transportation accounted for much of the increase because they were a larger share of consumers' total spending and they rose faster than the average. Among the housing subcomponents, expenditures on owned dwellings rose faster than average total expenditures for both urban and rural consumer units, while expenditures on rented dwellings rose at components, expenditures on vehicle increased at a faster rate than total expenditures and somewhat more for rural than for urban units. Gasoline and motor oil expenditures increased at a slightly faster rate than total expenditures for both urban and rural consumers. Gasoline price increases that contributed to sharp increases in expenditures in the 1970's were offset by subsequent price decreases and by conservation measures. Prices for motor fuel, motor oil, coolant, and other products rose 241 percent between 1973 and 1981 as measured by the CPI, then dropped about 9 percent between 1981 and 1985; the net change from 1973 to 1985 was 211 percent. Also, average fuel consumption per automobile dropped by 24 percent from 1973 to 1984 while the average mileage per gallon for automobiles improved 28 percent over that period.(4)

(4)Data on fuel consumption are from Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1987 (Bureau of the Census, 1987), p. 590, table 1032, "Domestic Motor Fuel Consumption, By Type of Vehicle: 1970 to 1984.'

Expenditures on some components, such as vehicles mentioned previously, rose at different rates for urban consumers than they did for rural consumers. Expenditures for alcoholic beverages rose at a faster rate for rural consumer units than for urban units between 1972-73 and 1985. However, this component is historically underreported so that changes may reflect better reporting rather than actual increases alone. Expenditures for other lodging (which include expenses for vocation homes and lodging while out of town) rose faster for urban than for rural units, as did expenditures for miscellaneous goods and services (which included bank fees, legal and accounting fees, funerals, cemetry lots, union dues, occupational expenses, and finance charges other than for mortgages and vehicles).

Changes in expenditure shares. Change in the shares of total expenditures spent on different components are used to show how consumers' expenditure patterns change over time. Increases or decreases in shares show changes in the way consumer units allocate their expenditures on individual components relative to the change in total expenditures. Changes in share can take place gradually over a period of years as consumers alter their expenditures in response to changes in tastes, preferences, or lifestyle, or in response to sudden economic changes. For example, the share of the food dollar spent on food at home has been declined over time and can be attributed in part to he increase in the number of two-earner households. Families have had to adjust their schedules to meet job requirements, which has resulted in multiple-earner families taking more meals outside the home. An example of a more sudden change was the sharp increase in expenditures on gasoline in the 1970's as a result of the 1973-74 oil embargo that depleted supplies and forced up prices.

Data in table 2 show how expenditure shares for urban and rural consumer units changed between 1972-73 and 1985. Shares are also shown for 1980 because, for some components such as food and gasoline, the shares over the entire period from 1972-73 to 1985 were not steadily increasing or decreasing. Food expenditure shares for urban and rural consumer units each increased about 1 percentage point between 1972-73 and 1980. Subsequent, food expenditure increases slowed relative to increases in expenditures for other goods and services, and this is reflected in the drop in food expenditure shares between 1980 and 1985: Food expenditure shares dropped for both urban and rural consumer units, but more for rural units than urban. In 1972-73, food accounted for a larger share of rural consumers' total unit expenditures than of urban consumers' -- 20 percent versus 18 percent -- but, by 1985, this difference had almost disappeared. The decline in food expenditure shares from 1980 to 1985 was accounted for entirely by the drop in the food at home component, as expenditure shares for food away from home actually increased slightly over the period. As a result, food away from home accounted for an increasing portion of overall food expenditures. The drop in expenditure shares for food at home corresponds to the slower price rise of food at home items relative to the price increases of all goods and services. From 1980 to 1985, food at home prices as measured by the CPI-U rose only 18 percent compared to a 31-percent increase in the All-Items CPI-U.

Housing expenditure share increased steadily from 1972-73 to 1985 for both urban and rural consumer units; the share that urban units spent on housing rose about 3 percentage points, from 28 percent in 1972-73 to 31 percent in 1985, while rural units' share rose about 2 percentage points, from 25 percent to 27 percent over the period. The precentage of units that were homeowners rose about 3 percentage points for both urban and rural consumers.

Transportation expenditure shares rose over the period 1972-73 to 1985, but more for rural than for urban consumer units. Shares rose from 22 to 25 percent for rural units compared to an increase from 19 to 20 percent for their contributed to a rise in gasoline expenditure shares from 1972-73 to 1980. However, the subsequent decline in prices, coupled with conservation measures, resulted in gasoline shares dropping to about the same level as in 1972-73 by 1985. Increases in expenditures on vehicles were responsible for the larger increases in the overall transporation component for rural consumers than for urban consumers. Vehicle shares dropped slightly from 1972-73 to 1980 for both urban and rural consumer units. However, they then rose sharply from 1980 to 1985 and more rapidly for rural than for urban units. Other transportation components accounted for about the same share of total expenditures in 1985 as in 1972-73.

Expenditure shares for retirement, pensions, and Social Security also increased from 1972-73 to 1985. Shares rose about 3 percentage points for both urban and rural consumer units, with much of the increase occurring between 1980 and 1985. Over that period, the annual maximum taxable earnings for Social Security rose from $25,900 to $39,600 and the employee contribution rate rose from 6.13 percent to 7.05 percent.(5)

(5)Data are from Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1987, p. 348, table 586, "Social Security (OASDHI) -- Contribution Rates: 1970 to 1990."

THIS REPORT SHOWS that there are differences in the way that urban and rural consumers allocate their expenditure budgets. Also, the differences in expenditure shares between the two groups are not static, but rather fluctuate in response to socioeconomic changes. As more date become available, analysts will have the opportunity to compare and follow changes in expenditure patterns of the two groups. The data provided by the Consumer Expenditure Survey can be of help in developing economic programs specific to each of the two different population groups.

TABLE: Table 1. Trends in selected characteristics and average annual expensitures of urban and rural consumer units and in the CPI-U, 1972-73 to 1985
 TABLE: Urban
 TABLE: Item Percent
 TABLE: 1972-73 1985 change
 TABLE: Rural
 TABLE: CPI-U
 TABLE: Percent percent
 TABLE: Item 1972-73 1985 change change(2)


(2)CPI'S for some components are not conceptually comparable to the CE data and are not shown. For some components, there may not be a direct correspondence between the CE and CPI, and for those components the change for the most comparable component, or a weighted average change of more than one component, is shown.

TABLE: Table 2. Expenditure shares of urban and rural consumer units, Interview Survey, 1972-73, 1980, and 1985(1) (In percent)
 TABLE: Urban
 TABLE: Item
 TABLE: 1972-73 1980 1985 TABLE:
 Rural
 TABLE: Significance
 TABLE: Item 1972-73 1980 1985 test(2)


(1)Expenditure shares are the percent of total expenditures spend on each component.

(2)A chi-square test of the significance of the difference between proportions was used to test whether the difference between urban and rural shares in 1985 was significant at the 5-percent level. Those components for which the difference was significant are marked by an asterisk.
COPYRIGHT 1988 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1988 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Rogers, John M.
Publication:Monthly Labor Review
Date:Mar 1, 1988
Words:2755
Previous Article:Productivity in industrial inorganic chemicals.
Next Article:Glass container wage gains trail those in other glassware plants.
Topics:


Related Articles
Distribution of consumption examined using aggregate expenditure shares.
Consumer expenditures: results from the Diary and Interview surveys.
New basket of goods and services being priced in revised CPI.
Goods vs. services: from the perspective of consumer spending.
Experimental cost-of-living indexes: a summary of current research.
Consumer expenditures in different-size cities.
How family spending has changed in the U.S.
Consumer spending on durables and services in the 1980's.
Experimental price index for elderly consumers.
The nature of Indian inequality increase after liberalization.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters