Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,792,844 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Exempt organization issues.


The Service's Exempt Organizations Division (EO) is considering a voluntary compliance program under which tax-exempt organizations could disclose Sec. 4958 violations (excess benefit transactions for disqualified dis·qual·i·fy  
tr.v. dis·qual·i·fied, dis·qual·i·fy·ing, dis·qual·i·fies
1.
a. To render unqualified or unfit.

b. To declare unqualified or ineligible.

2.
 persons). The EO is "very interested" in the idea of voluntary compliance, but does not want to administer it on an ad hoc For this purpose. Meaning "to this" in Latin, it refers to dealing with special situations as they occur rather than functions that are repeated on a regular basis. See ad hoc query and ad hoc mode.  basis. A formal program is being explored, but no decision has yet been made, nor any timetable set.

The EO is also working on guidelines for when agents should recommend both intermediate sanctions Intermediate sanctions is a term used in regulations enacted by the United States Internal Revenue Service that is applied to non-profit organizations who engage in transactions that inure to the benefit of a disqualified person within the organization.  and revocation of an organization's exempt status; for now, the Service is looking at such situations on a case-by-case basis. Any agent making such a recommendation must run it through the IRS's Washington, DC, headquarters.

The EO plans to issue an article within the next few weeks on "automatic" excess-benefit transactions under Sec. 4958. The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  is looking for Looking for

In the context of general equities, this describing a buy interest in which a dealer is asked to offer stock, often involving a capital commitment. Antithesis of in touch with.
 substantially excessive compensation of nonprofits' officers (i.e., those who receive $300,000 or $400,000 more than they should).
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Laffie, Lesli S.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Jan 1, 2004
Words:161
Previous Article:Personal interest nondeductible.
Next Article:Partnership installment obligations.
Topics:



Related Articles
Applicability of UNICAP rules to exempt organizations. (uniform capitalization)
The Internet and tax-exempt organizations.
IRS issues corporate sponsorship prop. regs.(IRS proposed regulations concerning tax-exempt organizations)
Untangling a sec. 501(c)(7) club's Web pages.(Internal Revenue Code)
Deferred compensation alternatives to sec. 457(f).(large tax-exempt organizations)
Clarifying unrelated business income.(tax-exempt organizations)
Corporate sponsorship regulations finalized. (Exempt Organizations).
Tax-exempt and commercial organization joint ventures.(LEGAL)
Beware U.S. tax rules on grants to foreign organizations.
E-filing requirements for exempt organizations.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles