Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,763,846 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Erratum.


Table 8. Development of definite/probable CBD and
sensitization by average cumulative, average mean,
and peak exposure ([+ or -] SE).

Disease                No. of
outcome              individuals

Definite/
  Probable CBD           40
Sensitization            37
Normal                   377

                        Mean
                     cumulative
                      exposure
                      ([micro]                Mean
Disease                g-year/              exposure
outcome              [m.sup.3])              (days)

Definite/
  Probable CBD     181 [+ or -] 29      3483 [+ or -] 50
Sensitization    100 [+ or -] 23 (a)   1934 [+ or -] 5 (b)
Normal             209 [+ or -] 16      3359 [+ or -] 76

                        Mean                  Mean
                       average                peak
                      exposure              exposure
Disease                 (mg/                  (mg/
outcome              [m.sup.3])            [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  Probable CBD    1.6 [+ or -] 0.21     3.1 [+ or -] 0.36
Sensitization     1.6 [+ or -] 0.16     2.9 [+ or -] 0.4
Normal            1.6 [+ or -] 0.06     3.3 [+ or -] 0.13

(a) p= 0.03 for sensitization vs. definite/probable and
p = 0.0003 for sensitization vs. normal.

(b) p = 0.047 for sensitization vs. definite/probable and
p = 0.02 for sensitization vs. normal.

Table 9. Development of definite/probable CBD and sensitization by
chemical form of beryllium, mixed, nonsoluble, and soluble: mean
cumulative, mean average, and mean peak exposure levels.

                          Mixed

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome   No.   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD    40        50          0.9          3.7
Sensitization     37      20 (b)        0.8          6.8
Normal            377       49          0.9          5.9

                        Nonsoluble

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome         [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD             126          1.7          5.1
Sensitization             61 (c)        1.6          5.1
Normal                     128          1.6          6.1

                         Soluble

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome         [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD           5.8 (a)        0.9          1.1
Sensitization               19          0.8          3.3
Normal                      26          0.9          2.7

(a) p < 0.0001 for definite/probable vs. normal.

(b) p= 0.0005 for sensitization vs. normal.

(c) p=0.04 for sensitization vs. definite/probable, and
p = 0.003 for sensitization vs. normal.

Table 10. Development of definite/probable CBD and sensitization by
physical form of beryllium, dust, fume, and mixed: mean
cumulative, mean average, and mean peak exposure levels.

                                       Dust

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome   No.   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD    40       128          1.6          5.2
Sensitization     37      66 (c)        1.5          5.1
Normal            377      138          1.5          6.6

                                       Fume

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome         [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD             4 (a)        0.5         0.8 (b)
Sensitization               17          0.9          3.3
Normal                      20          0.6          1.9

                                       Mixed

                        Cumulative      Mean         Peak
                        ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/   ([micro]g/
Disease outcome         [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])   [m.sup.3])

Definite/
  probable CBD              49          0.9          3.7
Sensitization             17 (d)        0.8          6.8
Normal                      46          0.9          5.9

(a) p < 0.0002 for definite/probable vs. normal.

(b) p = 0.04 for defintite/probable vs. normal.

(c) p = 0.0021 for sensitization vs. normal.

(d) p = 0.0004 for sensitization vs. normal.

Table 11. Development of definite/probable CBD and
sensitization by the American Conference of Governmental
and Industrial Hygienists notice of intended change,
current OSHA, and DOE DWA threshold levels.

                             Mean DWA exposure ([micro]g/
                                 [m.sub.3]) [n (%)]

                                                     [greater
                                                       than
                                                       or
                                                      equal
                        0 to    0.02 to    0.2 to      to]
Disease outcome         < 0.02   < 0.2      < 2         2

Definite/probable CBD   0 (0)    0 (0)    33 (10)     7 (6)
Sensitization           0 (0)    0 (0)     24 (7)    13 (11)
Normal                  0 (0)   3 (100)   279 (83)   95 (83)
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Perspectives: Correcpondence
Publication:Environmental Health Perspectives
Article Type:Correction notice
Date:Apr 1, 2006
Words:627
Previous Article:Beryllium exposure data: Rosenman et al. respond.(Perspectives: Correspondence)
Next Article:U.S. Ocean Policy Report Card.(Marine and Coastal Science)



Related Articles
Erratum Vol.7, No. 2.(correction to "Economic impact of antimicrobial resistance")(Correction Notice)
Erratum.(correction to article by Colin Coulter in last issue)(Correction Notice)
Erratum: statistical interpretation of key comparison reference value and degrees of equivalence.(Errata)(Correction Notice)
Erratum: determining the magnetic properties of 1 kg mass standards.(Errata)(Correction Notice)
Errata.(Perspectives / Correspondence)(Correction Notice)
Erratum.(Perspectives: Correspondence)(Correction Notice)
Errata.(Perspectives / Correspondence)(Correction Notice)
Errata.(Perspectives / Correspondence)(Correction Notice)
Errata.(Correction notice)(Correction Notice)
Energy Reference Connoisseur RC-70 Loudspeakers.(T$S)(Correction notice)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles