Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,702,589 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Entanglement in the macroworld: 'spooky action at a distance' observed in superconductors.


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

By linking the electrical currents of two superconductors large enough to be seen with the naked eye, researchers have extended the domain of observable quantum effects. Billions of flowing electrons in the superconductors can collectively exhibit a weird quantum property called entanglement, usually confined to the realm of tiny particles, scientists report in the Sept. 24 Nature.

"It's an exciting piece of work," comments physicist Steven Girvin of Yale University. "People are interested in pushing the boundaries of quantum mechanics."

Entanglement is one of the strangest consequences of quantum mechanics. After interacting in a certain way, objects become mysteriously linked, or entangled, so that what happens to one seems to affect the fate of the other. For the most part, researchers have found signs of entanglement only between tiny particles, such as ions, atoms and photons.

John Martinis and colleagues at the University of California, Santa Barbara looked for entanglement between two superconductors, each less than a millimeter across. These superconducting circuits, made of aluminum, were separated by a few millimeters on an electronic chip. At low temperatures, electrons in the superconductors flow collectively, unfettered by resistance.

Despite each superconductor's relatively large size, the electrons move together in a coherent way. "There are very few moving parts, so to speak," Girvin says. "It's a general fact that the larger an object is, the more classical it is in its behavior, and the more difficult it is to see quantum mechanical effects."

In the new study, researchers used a microwave pulse to attempt to entangle the electrical currents of the two superconductors. If the currents were quantum-mechanically linked, one current would flow clockwise at the time of measurement (assigned a value of 0), while the other would flow counterclockwise when measured (a value of 1), Martinis says. But the currents' directions would be completely independent of each other if classical physics were at work.

After attempting to entangle the superconducting circuits, Martinis and his team measured the current directions 34.1 million times. When one current flowed clockwise (0), the other flowed counterclockwise (1) with very high probability. So the two were linked in a way that only quantum mechanics could explain.

"It has to be in this weird quantum state for you to get those particular probabilities that we measure," Martinis says. "The percentages of those different things are not something that you can classically predict."

Finding entanglement between superconductors is "a fairly important milestone," comments Anthony Leggett of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The new study "does seem to be rather unambiguous evidence for entanglement."

Entangled superconductors might be used in a powerful quantum computer. "People are very interested in the possibility of building a quantum computer," and these kinds of systems maybe quite good for that, Leggett says.

Martinis says that the technology for building advanced electrical circuits may be used to build quantum circuits, too. "The hope is that since we know how to put together integrated circuits in complex ways, that maybe we can make very complex quantum circuits in the same way," he says.

He warns, though, that a good quantum computer is a long way off. Researchers still need to find a way to make entanglement in superconducting circuits last longer. And a good quantum computer would need more than two circuits. Martinis says his group will try to entangle three and four such circuits next.

Besides providing technological advances, the new results add to the debate over where to draw the line between quantum mechanics and the everyday physics that governs large-scale phenomena. Researchers want to know how far quantum weirdness can go.
COPYRIGHT 2009 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Matter & Energy
Author:Sanders, Laura
Publication:Science News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 24, 2009
Words:603
Previous Article:Keeping hepatitis c out.(Brief article)
Next Article:The element tin flouts carbon's chemistry rules: heavy metals don't always behave like organic neighbor.(Molecules)
Topics:



Related Articles
Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics.(Book Review)
Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality.
Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality.
Organic molecular solids.(Brief Article)(Book Review)
Radin, Dean (2006): Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality.(New Books Received)(Brief article)(Book review)
A cross the floor: parallel processes.(teach-learn connection)
Physicists get good vibrations on entanglement: 'spooky action at a distance' achieved with oscillating ions.(Atom & Cosmos)
Five problems in physics without the definite article.(COMMENT)
Casper becomes the quantum, friendly ghost.(Atom & Cosmos)(ghost imaging)(Brief article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles