Effects on the Immune System Associated with Living Near a Pesticide Dump Site.

In this paper, we report results of the second phase of a larger study designed to evaluate the effects on the immune system of living near a Superfund site containing organochlorine pesticides, volatile organic compounds, and metals. Phase II was conducted to determine whether living near the site, consisting of six locations in Aberdeen, North Carolina, is associated with higher plasma organochlorine levels, immune suppression, or DNA damage. Each of 302 residents of Aberdeen and neighboring communities provided a blood specimen, underwent a skin test, and answered a questionnaire. Blood specimens were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, immune markers, and micronuclei. Of 20 organochlorines tested, only DDE was detected in the blood of participants (except for one individual). Age-adjusted mean plasma DDE levels were 4.05 ppb for Aberdeen residents and 2.95 ppb (p = 0.01) for residents of neighboring communities. Residents of 40-59 years of age who lived within a mile of any site, but particularly the Farm Chemicals site, had higher plasma DDE levels than residents who lived farther away. Residents who lived near the Farm Chemicals site before versus after 1985 also had higher plasma DDE levels. Overall, there were few differences in immune markers between residents of Aberdeen and the neighboring communities. However, residents who lived closer to the dump sites had statistically significantly lower mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative activity than residents who lived farther away (p [is less than] 0.05). Residential location was not consistently associated with frequency of micronuclei or skin test responses. Although some statistically significant differences in immune markers were noted in association with residential location, the magnitude of effects are of uncertain clinical importance. Key words: hazardous waste, immune system, micronuclei, organochlorines, pesticides. Environ Health Perspect 108:1113-1124 (2000). [Online 1 November 2000] http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/108p1113-1124vine/abstract.html

The study reported in this paper is part of a larger research study designed to evaluate the effects on the immune system of living near a National Priority List Superfund Site (the Aberdeen pesticides dumps site) located in and around Aberdeen, North Carolina, which contained organochlorine pesticides, volatile organic compounds, and metals (1). Evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that pesticides (2-4), volatile organic compounds, (5,6) and metals (7-10) are capable of adversely affecting the immune system.

The overall research study was conducted in two phases. Phase I, a telephone survey of approximately 1,600 adults, 18-64 years of age, who lived in Aberdeen and several nearby communities in southern Moore County, took place during the spring and summer of 1994. The purpose of phase I was to determine whether or not living in Aberdeen was associated with adverse effects on the immune system as indicated by the occurrence of self-reported herpes zoster and other more common infectious diseases. Results of phase I, which have been reported elsewhere (11), showed that younger residents (18-40 years of age) and residents who lived in Aberdeen before 1985 (when pesticide manufacturing plants were in operation and before any remediation efforts took place) had a 2- to 3-fold higher risk of herpes zoster than residents of the comparison communities.

Phase II was undertaken to determine a) whether there was any evidence of human exposure to pesticides as the result of living near the dump site as indicated by higher levels of organochlorine pesticides in blood and b) whether living near the site was associated with immune suppression (as indicated by alterations in various markers of immune competence) and DNA damage (as indicated by the presence of lymphocyte micronculei). Associations between plasma organochlorine levels and immune markers are reported in another paper (12).

The Aberdeen pesticides dumps site is officially composed of five sites located in and around the town of Aberdeen in Moore County, North Carolina. The five sites (Figure 1) include a) Farm Chemicals site, an abandoned pesticide manufacturing/formulating facility that operated from the mid-1930s to 1987, and the most contaminated site (with 959,500 [micro]/kg DDT detected in surficial soil--three times the amount at any other site; Table 1) (13); b) Twin site--a pesticide disposal site across the street from the Farm Chemicals site; c) Fairway six, a pesticide disposal area; d) McIver site, a local landfill into which pesticides and drums were dumped; and e) Route 211 site, an old sand-mining pit into which pesticides were dumped. For purposes of this study, a sixth site, the Geigy Chemical Corporation site (also located in Aberdeen) was included. It had been the site of chemical companies and pesticide formulating companies that made DDT and other chlorinated pesticides from 1947 to 1967. Between 1967 and 1989 (when the property was abandoned), it served as a distribution site for the rebagging of prepackaged and bulk chemicals (14). Each site is approximately 1 acre in area, and all are within 2 miles of each other. Most of the sites were discovered in 1984 or 1985, when modest remediation efforts were begun (15). Extensive soil and groundwater remediation took place during the late 1990s after this study was conducted. At least 1,000 people live within a 1-mile radius of the sites (15).

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Table 1. Contaminants of concern in surficial soil and groundwater at
the Aberdeen pesticides dumps site.

                                     Farm Chemicals

                                Surficial        Ground
                                  soil            water
Chemicals                     ([micro]g/kg)   ([micro]g/L)

Pesticides
 4,4'-DDD                        15,975           0.05
 4,4'-DDE                          645            0.05
 4,4'-DDT                        959,500          0.05
 Aldrin                            100
 [Alpha]-BHC                     57,574            16
 [Beta]-BHC                      29,278             9
 [Delta]-BHC                     37,145            6.9
 Dieldrin                          260             0.4
 Endosulfan II ([Beta])                            0.1
 Endrin                                            0.2
 Endrin ketone                    27.0             0.4
 [Gamma]-BHC                     89,475            10
 [Gamma]-Chlordane                 148
 Heptachlor                        94
 Heptachlor epoxide
 Toxaphene                       286,212
Solvents
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane                             388
 1,1-Dichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloroethene
 Benzene
 Carbon disulfide                                 5,066
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Ethyl benzene                                   13,011
 Tetrachloroethene                                 750
 Toluene                                           846
 Trichloroethene                                   17
 Xylenes (total)                                 49,104
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene                            9.8
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                                38
 2-Methylnaphthalene                               8.1
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Naphthalene                                       11
Metals
 Antimony
 Arsenic                        2,463,000
 Barium                          194,000           100
 Beryllium                                         4.7
 Cadmium
 Chromium                                          325
 Cobalt
 Copper                        54,172,000         1,819
 Lead                           9,854,000           5
 Manganese                       78,000           3,162
 Mercury
 Nickel                           2,000            103
 Selenium
 Silver
 Vanadium
 Zinc                          15,268,000         4,599

                                          Twin

                                Surficial        Ground
                                  soil            water
Chemicals                     ([micro]g/kg)   ([micro]g/L)

Pesticides
 4,4'-DDD                         1,276           0.05
 4,4'-DDE                         2,335           0.05
 4,4'-DDT                        29,183           0.05
 Aldrin                            48              3.5
 [Alpha]-BHC                     35,198            10
 [Beta]-BHC                       3,230             5
 [Delta]-BHC                     12,449            18
 Dieldrin                          213
 Endosulfan II ([Beta])            23
 Endrin
 Endrin ketone                    11.2
 [Gamma]-BHC                     15,123            4.1
 [Gamma]-Chlordane
 Heptachlor                        8.9
 Heptachlor epoxide
 Toxaphene                       21,093
Solvents
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane                             100
 1,1-Dichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloroethene
 Benzene
 Carbon disulfide
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Ethyl benzene                                     600
 Tetrachloroethene                                  9
 Toluene                                           36
 Trichloroethene
 Xylenes (total)                                  2,900
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene                            22
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                                 6
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Naphthalene
Metals
 Antimony                                          430
 Arsenic                          3,300
 Barium                          21,195
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Chromium                        10,824             9
 Cobalt                                             6
 Copper                          33,208            180
 Lead                             4,700             9
 Manganese                        7,293            210
 Mercury                           87
 Nickel                                            36
 Selenium
 Silver                                            22
 Vanadium                        15,895
 Zinc                             5,580            540

                                      Fairway six

                                Surficial        Ground
                                  soil            water
Chemicals                     ([micro]g/kg)   ([micro]g/L)

Pesticides
 4,4'-DDD
 4,4'-DDE
 4,4'-DDT
 Aldrin
 [Alpha]-BHC
 [Beta]-BHC
 [Delta]-BHC
 Dieldrin
 Endosulfan II ([Beta])
 Endrin
 Endrin ketone
 [Gamma]-BHC
 [Gamma]-Chlordane
 Heptachlor
 Heptachlor epoxide
 Toxaphene
Solvents
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane                             7.3
 1,1-Dichloroethene                                 2
 1,2-Dichloroethene
 Benzene
 Carbon disulfide
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Ethyl benzene
 Tetrachloroethene
 Toluene
 Trichloroethene
 Xylenes (total)
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene                            20
 2,4-Dimethylphenol
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Naphthalene
Metals
 Antimony
 Arsenic
 Barium                           9,434
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Chromium                        15,035            183
 Cobalt
 Copper                          10,742
 Lead
 Manganese                       18,448            167
 Mercury                           117
 Nickel                                            116
 Selenium
 Silver
 Vanadium                        111,522
 Zinc                            24,269

                                         McIver

                                Surficial        Ground
                                  soil            water
Chemicals                     ([micro]g/kg)   ([micro]g/L)

Pesticides
 4,4'-DDD                         4,101           0.05
 4,4'-DDE                         1,400           0.05
 4,4'-DDT                        34,240           0.03
 Aldrin
 [Alpha]-BHC                     80,158           0.02
 [Beta]-BHC                      14,718           0.03
 [Delta]-BHC                      5,974           0.02
 Dieldrin
 Endosulfan II ([Beta])
 Endrin
 Endrin ketone
 [Gamma]-BHC                      2,985           0.01
 [Gamma]-Chlordane
 Heptachlor
 Heptachlor epoxide
 Toxaphene                       30,265
Solvents
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 1,1-Dichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloroethene
 Benzene
 Carbon disulfide
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Ethyl benzene
 Tetrachloroethene
 Toluene
 Trichloroethene
 Xylenes (total)
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
 2,4-Dimethylphenol
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Naphthalene
Metals
 Antimony
 Arsenic
 Barium                                            54
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Chromium
 Cobalt
 Copper
 Lead
 Manganese                       10,000
 Mercury
 Nickel
 Selenium
 Silver
 Vanadium
 Zinc                             4,400

                                       Route 211

                                Surficial        Ground
                                  soil            water
Chemicals                     ([micro]g/kg)   ([micro]g/L)

Pesticides
 4,4'-DDD                        17,679           0.05
 4,4'-DDE                          8.5            0.05
 4,4'-DDT                        354,926          0.05
 Aldrin
 [Alpha]-BHC                     648,930          0.02
 [Beta]-BHC                      35,885           0.04
 [Delta]-BHC                      5,431           0.03
 Dieldrin
 Endosulfan II ([Beta])
 Endrin
 Endrin ketone
 [Gamma]-BHC                     12,158           0.02
 [Gamma]-Chlordane
 Heptachlor
 Heptachlor epoxide
 Toxaphene                       692,172
Solvents
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 1,1-Dichloroethene                                10
 1,2-Dichloroethene
 Benzene
 Carbon disulfide
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Ethyl benzene
 Tetrachloroethene
 Toluene
 Trichloroethene
 Xylenes (total)
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
 2,4-Dimethylphenol
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Naphthalene
Metals
 Antimony
 Arsenic
 Barium                           8,600
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Chromium                                          20
 Cobalt                           7,100
 Copper
 Lead
 Manganese                      1,200,000          60
 Mercury                        4,800,000
 Nickel                           5,300
 Selenium
 Silver
 Vanadium                        10,000
 Zinc

Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (13).

In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (13) conducted studies showing that soil and groundwater at the Aberdeen pesticides dumps site had been contaminated with a variety of organochlorine pesticides, volatile organic compounds, and metals. About the same time, three Aberdeen municipal wells were shut down due to contamination with the organochlorine pesticide lindane. Significant airborne exposure to pesticides from the Farm Chemicals site was suspected by Robert Mobbs, a local physician, as far back as 1948. At that time, Mobbs reported in a letter to the Journal of the American Medical Association (16) that a child who lived 100 yams away from the plant had died with convulsions.

In a pilot cross-sectional study conducted in the early 1990s, Backer (17) assessed effects on the immune system of pet dogs living in Aberdeen compared to those living in a control community (Pinehurst/Southern Pines, North Carolina) with no known pesticide dump sites. The 20 pet dogs that lived in Aberdeen exhibited nonstatisticatly significant lower CD4:CD8 ratios (an indicator of immune suppression) than the 21 control dogs (1.54 [+ or -] 1.14 vs. 2.05 [+ or -] 0.87, mean [+ or -] SD), and statistically significant higher frequencies of micronuclei as detected in lymphocytes (number of micronuclei per 1000 binucteate cells: 24.2 vs. 11.0, p [is less than] 0.0001).

There are many potential markers of immune suppression. In this study, we selected four major classes of markers as a screen: a) the absolute number and percentages of white blood cells, lymphocytes, and their subsets, b) the levels of different classes of immunoglobulins, c) the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to six antigens and a control as determined using the Multitest CMI skin test, and d) mitogen stimulation assays. These markers are broad indicators of both cell-mediated and humoral immune function, which are important in the protection from and reaction to infection as well as nonspecific resistance to infection. Classes a-c above include immune markers that are recommended by the National Research Council (7) as first-level tests for individuals suspected of immune deficiency. The Multitest skin test has been advocated as an alternative to intradermal skin testing because one can simultaneously apply several antigens in a standardized manner. Delayed-type hypersensitivity skin testing is an essential component of the evaluation of immune unction reflecting cell-mediated immunity. Because it involves multiple steps including antigen recognition and processing, T-lymphocyte activation and response, cytokine production, and cell migration, it is thought to best represent an individual's response to exogenous antigens. The mitogen stimulation assay is an alternative to delayed-type hypersensitivity skin testing for evaluating lymphocyte function. This in vitro assay compares the ability of a person's lymphocytes to undergo blastogenesis in response to chemical stimulants (mitogens). The response is compared to a person's own unstimulated response and to that of known controls. Mitogens used in this study include phytohemaglutinin (PHA), concanavalin A (CON-A), and pokeweed mitogen (PWM). These mitogens represent two T-lymphocyte mitogens and a T-cell--dependent B cell mitogen. A positive mitogen test panel requires the functioning of both T and B cells as well as macrophages. Suppression of lymphocyte function may result in increased susceptibility to both infection and cancer. Other more specific immune assays were considered for inclusion in the study (e.g., assays for cytokines) but were not performed because of cost considerations.

Methods

Study Participants

Study participants included 302 adults, 18-66 years of age, who were residents of Aberdeen, North Carolina, and several neighboring communities (comparison areas). They were randomly selected (one per household) from among the 1,600 eligible residents who participated in the phase I telephone survey study. Eligible residents included 878 residents of Aberdeen (from 614 households) and 722 residents of the comparison areas (from 524 households) (11). To be eligible for phase I, residents had to have lived for at least 1 year in Aberdeen, Pinebluff, Taylortown, or certain sections within and north of Pinehurst, all of which are communities in southern Moore County, North Carolina. In addition, residents had to a) obtain their drinking water from a groundwater source, b) be able to speak English, c) have a listed telephone number, and d) not have worked in a pesticide manufacturing company (as we were interested in residential pesticide exposures). Residents in the communities surrounding Aberdeen were excluded if they had ever lived in Aberdeen. A detailed discussion of participant selection and enrollment for the phase I telephone survey study is presented by Arndt et al. (11).

Enrollment in phase II was limited to 302 participants (151 Aberdeen residents, 151 comparison area residents) because of cost constraints and because with that number we estimated we could detect a 25% difference in the CD4:CD8 ratio between residents of Aberdeen and the comparison communities with more than 80% power, assuming an o of 0.05. In the previous pilot study of pet dogs, a 25% reduction in the CD4:CD8 ratio was noted among the dogs from Aberdeen compared to the dogs from nearby towns (17).

Participants were enrolled in the phase II study between September 1994 and March 1996. Potentially eligible residents were sent a letter explaining the study. The letter was followed by a telephone call to assess eligibility. If eligible, two appointments were scheduled: one to answer a 30-min telephone questionnaire and one to provide 45 mL blood and undergo a skin test at a local health clinic from 0700 to 0930 hr on a Tuesday morning. The skin test was read 48 hr later. Participants signed consent forms before any laboratory procedures were performed. Study participants were paid $20 for out-of-pocket expenses. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of North Carolina Schools of Public Health and Medicine.

We excluded from participation those individuals who had a bleeding disorder, who reported testing positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), who reported having eczema on the forearms, and who had had an asthma attack in the past year (which might make them more susceptible to an allergic reaction to the skin test); we also excluded residents from the comparison communities who had worked in Aberdeen for at least 20 hr/week during the past year. Potential participants were temporarily excluded if they reported having had an acute infection within the past month, or surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunizations, or a blood transfusion or took immunosuppressive drugs within the previous 2 months. Women who were pregnant or lactating were also excluded. Eligibility criteria were reassessed during a reminder call the night before the clinic visit. Appointments were rescheduled when necessary.

We made at least 10 attempts to contact potentially eligible participants over a 3-month period including daytime, evening, and weekend times. Reasons for nonparticipation include the following: 188 had an ineligible address, had moved, or had a nonworking phone number; 98 were ineligible based on participation criteria; 118 had another household member already enrolled; 439 refused; 38 could not be reached, and 417 were not contacted because we reached the goal of 302 total participants. Of the residents eligible for the phase I study, 38% of those contacted in Aberdeen and 37% in the comparison areas participated in the phase II study. The most common reasons for refusal to participate were lack of interest and inability to make the time commitment for a 30-min telephone interview and two clinic visits. Some of those who had declined to participate further after phase I may actually have been ineligible for phase II, making participation rates conservative estimates.

Blood Drawing

A trained nurse drew 45 mL blood from each study participant into vacutainer tubes. The blood specimens were analyzed for organochlorine pesticide levels and indicators of immune competence including numbers and percentages of various types of white blood cells, immunoglobulin levels (IgA, IgG, IgE, IgM), and degree of mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative activity with three different mitogens. The blood specimens were also analyzed for the presence of DNA damage as indicated by the lymphocyte micronucleus assay.

Organochlorine Levels

Plasma DDE levels for 301 participants were evaluated as part of an organochlorine pesticide panel that included p,p-DDT, p,p-DDE, p,p-DDD, o,p-DDT, o,p-DDE, o,p-DDD, [Alpha]-hexachlorocyclohexane ([Alpha]-BHC), [Beta]-BHC, [Delta]-BHC, lindane, hexachlorobenzene, [Alpha]-endosulfan, [Beta]-endosulfan, dieldrin, endrin, cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, oxychlordane, heptachlor, and heptachlorepoxide. Assay methods were developed by LabCorp (Burlington, NC) based on methods reported by Lopez-Avila et al. (18) and Saady and Poklis (19). Briefly, chlorinated pesticides in plasma were extracted from a methanol-deproteinated sample into hexane, and the extract was cleaned by C18 solid-phase extraction. The extract was injected into a gas chromatograph with dual capillary columns and dual electron capture detectors (Perkin-Elmer gas chromatograph; Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Both columns had to indicate a positive result for a sample to be considered positive for a pesticide. LabCorp calibrated the gas chromatograph and associated data reduction equipment on each day of use, running positive and negative controls after every 10th sample. Positive controls contained known amounts of every analyte included in the analysis. Negative controls consisted of a serum matrix. The average recovery for all analytes in the assay was estimated to be 100.9%. The lower limit of quantification for the assay was 1 ppb (20).

The same panel of 20 pesticides was analyzed at a different laboratory (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) on duplicate specimens for 14 arbitrarily selected study participants over a 3-week period. Agreement between the two laboratories was excellent (correlation coefficient= 0.96).

Complete Blood Cell Counts

A complete blood cell count was performed on 298 participants. Standardized LabCorp procedures with Westgard rules of quality control were used (21).

Lymphocyte Phenotypes

Percentages of the following lymphocyte phenotypes were determined at the University of North Carolina Hospitals for 300 participants according to the methods described by Tamul et al. (22): CD3 (total T cells), CD3 positive/CD4 positive (CD4) (T helper cells), CD3 positive/CD8 positive (CD8) (T suppressor cells), CD16 (majority of natural killer cells), CD19 (total B cells), and CD56 (natural killer cells subset). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for quality control were followed (23). The University of North Carolina Hospitals established reference ranges based on laboratory values from 25 normal adults (24). The values represent the mean + 2 SDs.

Immunoglobulin Levels

LabCorp determined levels of IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgE for 299 study participants. IgG, IgA, and IgM were assayed using a quantitative turbidimetric method based on an antibody--antigen reaction adapted for a centrifugal analyzer (Roche Cobas Mira, Indianapolis, IN) with reference ranges determined by LabCorp.

IgE levels were analyzed in a one-step, solid-phase immunoassay using two highly specific monoclonal mouse antibodies to IgE (Ciba-Corning Total IgE; Ciba-Corning, Atlanta, GA) with the Roche Cobas Core IgE instrument. The coefficient of variation for low, medium, and high mean values was [is less than] 5% (25).

Skin Test

A total of 297 adults (148 Aberdeen, 149 comparison areas) underwent a skin test using the Multitest CMI skin test (Pasteur Merieux Serums & Vaccines S.A., Lyon, France; distributed by Connaught Laboratories, Inc., Swiftwater, PA). Five subjects (3 from Aberdeen and 2 from the comparison areas) who reported having previous widespread or systemic reactions to skin tests or tetanus or diphtheria vaccinations were excluded from the skin test studies.

The Multitest CMI skin test consists of a disposable plastic applicator containing eight sterile test units preloaded with seven delayed hypersensitivity skin test antigens and a glycerine control. The seven antigens are tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, Candida, Tricophyton, Streptococcus, Proteus, and tuberculin. For this study, the tuberculin unit was detached from the applicator because a) increased rates of mycobacteria exposure in the South (where the study took place) would likely have increased reactions to the tuberculin test, and b) follow-up of false positive skin tests with further evaluation and treatment would have been unduly burdensome to the study participants.

A trained nurse applied the skin test on the inner forearm of each study participant between 0700 and 0930 hr and then read the skin test results 48 hr later. For each antigen site, the indurated area was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm across two diameters perpendicular to each other. The overall diameter of the indurated area was calculated as the mean of the two diameters. In normal individuals previously exposed to one of the antigens, an indurated area should occur on the forearm, indicating that the immune system recognized the antigen. A negative test result could mean that the immune system did not recognize the antigen or that the person had never been previously exposed. See Vine et al. (26) for more details regarding skin test methods..

Mitogen Stimulation Assays

We performed mitogen stimulation assays on 260 study participants (131 from Aberdeen and 129 from the comparison communities) as described by Wilson et al. (27) using three mitogens: PWM, CON-A, and PHA. [Reasons for unanalyzed specimens include unsatisfactory specimen (19; e.g., clotted); technical difficulties (8), and laboratory closed for vacation (16).] Blood samples were maintained at a constant temperature and kept under conditions established by the AIDS Clinical Trials Study Group (23) during transportation and were delivered to the laboratory within 6 hr of blood donation. Lymphocyte separation and cultures were begun shortly thereafter. Tritiated thymidine was added at 72 hr, and cells were harvested 18 hr later. Radioactive counts per minute (CPM) were quantitated using a Matrix 96 Direct Beta Counter (Packard Bioscience Company, Downers Grove, IL).

Micronucleus Assay with Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Of the 302 study participants, results for the micronucleus assay were available for 254 participants (130 from Aberdeen and 124 from the comparison communities). [Reasons for unanalyzed specimens include unsatisfactory specimen (14); technical difficulties (11); and laboratory closed for vacation (23)]. We cultured the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) as described by Erexson et al. (28,29). All assays were cultured by one technician, and slides from 254 participants were read by three different scorers trained by one person. Scorers noted the total number of micronuclei per 1,000 binucleates as well as the percentage of cells that contained micronuclei. Scorers were unaware of the characteristics of the individuals whose slides they were scoring. Despite quality control efforts, one scorer tended to produce lower values than the other two scorers, requiring us to control for scorer in the statistical analyses.

Telephone Questionnaire

A 30-min telephone questionnaire was administered by trained interviewers to all participants within the 2 weeks before their appointment at the clinic. The questionnaire assessed residential, recreational, and occupational exposures to pesticides, other chemicals, and metals. In addition, residents were asked about their residential history, sources of tap water, water consumption, dietary intake of caffeine, alcohol, fruits, vegetables, meat, and dairy products, smoking habits, medical history, reproductive history (women only), allergies, and perceived stress and perceptions concerning health risk due to environmental exposures in their neighborhood--for example, swimming in or eating fish caught in a local lake near the dump sites.

Residential Address Matching

To calculate the distance from each residence to each of the six dump sites, we first automatically address-matched street addresses to the North Carolina Department of Instruction's Transportation Information Management System (TIMS; Raleigh, NC) geographic information files using Arc/Info (Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA), with 28% exact matches. Enlarged maps marked by study participants during their clinic visit allowed the transfer into Arc-Info of the exact locations for the remaining residential addresses. Geographic coordinates for the dump sites were obtained from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (Atlanta, GA).

Statistical Analysis Methods

Residential location and plasma organochlorine pesticide levels. To determine whether residents of Aberdeen (and more specifically, those who lived near the dump sites) have higher levels of organochlorine pesticide levels in their blood than people living farther away, we calculated mean and median plasma DDE values by age, sex, distance from dump sites, and study area. Only DDE levels were assessed because only one individual (from Aberdeen who reported occupational exposure to pesticides) had a detectable level of any of the other organochlorine pesticides analyzed, namely, heptachlorepoxide (2.0 ppb).

Analyses were conducted with and without excluding residents who reported having been employed in occupations that might have exposed them to organochlorine pesticides to assess the effects of residential versus occupational exposures. Residents were considered "occupationally exposed" if they currently lived on a farm (9 Aberdeen, 8 comparison areas), had ever worked as a farmer or farm worker (29 Aberdeen, 17 comparison areas), pesticide formulator, applicator or mixer (12 Aberdeen, 20 comparison areas) gardener or groundskeeper (16 Aberdeen, 14 comparison areas), or ever had another job that exposed them to pesticides (12 Aberdeen, 20 comparison areas). A total of 104 persons were excluded from analyses based on reported occupational exposure.

We performed multivariate linear regression analyses with backward elimination strategies using SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Gary, NC) to determine whether plasma DDE levels were associated with distance of residences from the dump sites among Aberdeen residents only and to assess whether Aberdeen residents have higher DDE levels than residents of the comparison areas, controlling for potential confounders and effect modifiers. Potential confounders for inclusion in the initial models were identified from the literature and from among the variables that were predictive of DDE levels among residents of Aberdeen and the comparison areas. Covariates were evaluated sequentially and retained if there was more than a 10% change in the coefficient(s) of interest when they were eliminated from the model. Covariates included the following variables: age; sex; breast-fed; income [is greater than] $20,000; meat, dairy, vegetable, and fruit consumption/day; tap water source (private well vs. community supply); grew up in Aberdeen; occupational exposure to pesticides; recreational exposure to the dump sites; amount of plain tap water consumed per day; high school graduate; [is greater than or equal to] 10 years in current home; cigarette smoking (pack-years); and employed fulltime.

Residential location, immune markers, and micronuclei. To assess associations between residential location and immune markers, residential location was defined two ways: residence in Aberdeen versus the comparison areas, and residence within a mile of any dump site versus greater than 1 mile. We compared mean levels of each of the immune markers (blood cell counts, lymphocyte phenotypes, immunoglobulins, micronuclei, and mitogen stimulation assay results) among residents of Aberdeen and the comparison areas using analysis of covariance controlling for confounders. Mean values for each of the immune markers were also compared to established normal values. The number of individuals who had values higher or lower than established normal values was also compared across study areas using chi-square tests. Adjusted least-squares estimates (30) comparing mean levels of each of the immune markers among residents of Aberdeen who lived within 1 mile from any site with all other residents living [is greater than] 1 mile from any site (including residents in the comparison areas) were calculated using PROC GLM of SAS (SAS Institute), controlling for confounders. We calculated p-values for differences in means with a t-test.

Demographic characteristics, occupational data, diet, and lifestyle habits were evaluated as potential confounders of residence-outcome associations. A variable was considered a confounder if it was associated with both residential location and any of the outcome variables among the unexposed such that there was a 10% difference in the estimated mean value of the outcome between covariate categories. Only age ([is less than] 40, 40-49, 50-59, [is greater than or equal to] 60), sex, and pack-years (nonsmoker/ex-smoker, [is less than] 10, 10-38, [is greater than or equal to] 39) met these criteria. We did not adjust for medical history factors, as they may have been a consequence of immune dysfunction.

Results

Descriptive Characteristics of the Study Population

Aberdeen residents were, on average, 5 years younger and had lived in their homes and in town 3.6 years longer than residents of the comparison areas (Table 2). Aberdeen residents were significantly (p [is less than] 0.05) more likely to be female, employed full time, born in North Carolina, concerned about the effects of environmental chemicals on health, have a child under 6 years of age, and report fair or poor health. They were also more likely to be employed in a job requiring physical exertion, consume meat, have had recreational exposures to the dump sites (e.g., ate fish from or swam in a local lake), and have used flea and tick products than residents of the comparison areas. They were less likely to be married, consume alcohol daily, have played golf, lived directly on a golf course, or have had their homes commercially treated for insects. Past medical history and medication use was not remarkably different between the two groups.

Table 2. Descriptive characteristics of residents who lived in
Aberdeen and the comparison areas.

                                          Comparison
                              Aberdeen      areas
                              (n = 151)   (n = 151)

                                                        [[Chi]-square]
                               No. (%)     No. (%)         p-value
Age (years)
 < 40                          56 (37)      39 (26)
 40-49                         51 (34)      40 (26)
 50-59                         27 (18)      20 (13)
 [is greater than or equal
  to] 60                       17 (11)      52 (34)          0.00
Sex (female)                  103 (68)      86 (57)          0.04
Race (white)                  138 (91)     143 (95)          0.26
Years in town
 < 5                           26 (17)      42 (28)
 5- < 10                       35 (23)      48 (32)
 10- <15                       21 (14)       14(9)
 [is greater than or equal
  to] 15                       69 (46)      47 (31)          0.01
Years in home
 < 5                           37 (25)      67 (44)
 5- < 10                       45 (30)      51 (34)
 10- < 15                      23 (15)      11 (7)
 [is greater than or equal
  to] 15                       46 (30)      22 (15)          0.00
Born in North Carolina         91 (60)      60 (40)          0.00
Born in Moore County           43 (28)      38 (25)          0.52
College graduate               55 (37)      52 (35)          0.75
Household income > $20,000    126 (88)     136 (94)          0.06
Married                       112 (74)     130 (86)          0.01
Child < 6 years of age         31 (21)      18 (12)          0.04
Consume alcohol daily           9 (6)       28 (19)          0.00
Take vitamins regularly        63 (42)      79 (52)          0.07
Current smoker                 43 (28)      31 (21)          0.11
Pack-years
 Non/ex-smoker                108 (72)      20 (79)
 < 10                          11 (7)       11 (7)
 10-38                         21 (14)      12 (8)
 [is greater than or equal
  to] 39                       11 (7)        8 (5)           0.31
Employed full time            111 (74)      78 (52)          0.00
Self-reported fair or poor
 health                        21 (14)       8 (5)           0.01
Believe illness from home
 chemicals (yes or maybe)      18 (12)       7 (5)           0.02
Very concerned about           65 (43)      41 (27)          0.00
 chemical hazards
Private well                   35 (23)      27 (18)          0.25
Fruit [is greater than or
 equal to] 1 serving/day       32 (21)      33 (22)          0.94
Vegetables [is greater than
 or equal to] 1 serving/day    29 (19)      42 (28)          0.09
Dairy [is greater than or
 equal to] 1 serving/day       59 (40)      52 (34)          0.36
Meat [is greater than or
 equal to] 1 serving/day       97 (65)      76 (50)          0.01
Ever breast-fed (women)        49 (49)      47 (55)          0.40
Occupational exposure(a)       54 (36)      49 (32)          0.54
Recreational exposure to
 dump sites(b)                 80 (53)      61 (40)          0.03
Ever played golf               43 (28)      87 (58)          0.00
Live on golf course             0 (0)       38 (25)          0.00
Commercial treatment of        67 (46)      75 (50)          0.52
 home, termites
Commercial treatment of        49 (33)      67 (45)          0.03
 home, other insects
Use insecticides in home       95 (63)     103 (69)          0.33
Used flea and tick products    49 (32)      30 (20)          0.01
 in past 2 months
Hours sweat/week during        47 (31)      29 (19)          0.02
 work > 75th percentile(c)

(a)Occupational exposure to pesticides if yes to one of the
following: live on farm, worked as gardener, worked as farmer/farm
worker, pesticide formulator, mixer or applicator, or other pesticide
workers. (b)Yes to one of the following: ever played golf at Pit Golf
Links, ever visited dump sites, ever eaten fish caught at Pages Lake,
swam or waded in Pages Lake, fished in Pages Lake. (c)[is greater
than or equal to] 5 hr/week at job doing physical activity that caused
sweating.

Residential Location and Plasma DDE Levels

Age-adjusted mean DDE levels were significantly higher among Aberdeen residents than among residents of the comparison areas (Aberdeen: 4.05 ppb, range: 1-32 ppb; comparison areas: 2.95 ppb, range 1-24 ppb, p = 0.01). Average DDE levels among all study participants under 40 years of age was similar (1.6 ppb). Among those 40-59 or [is greater than or equal to] 60, residents of Aberdeen had higher DDE levels (40-59 years: 4.8 ppb, [is greater than or equal to] 60 years: 5.7 ppb) than those in the comparison areas (40-59 years: 3.2, [is greater than or equal to] 60 years: 4.7 ppb), whether or not individuals who reported having been employed in occupations that may have exposed them to pesticides were excluded. In fact, controlling for age, race, sex, and area of residence (Aberdeen vs. the comparison areas), there was no difference in mean plasma DDE levels between those who reported having been employed in occupations in which they may have been exposed to organochlorine pesticides (mean DDE = 3.4 ppb, SD = 0.37) and those who did not report working in such occupations (mean DDE = 3.5 ppb, SD = 0.26; p = 0.85).

Figure 2 shows that most Aberdeen residents with high plasma DDE values (i.e., [is greater than or equal to] 5 ppb, approximately the 80th percentile) lived within 1 mile of any dump site, but particularly within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site. (The Twin site was considered the same as the Farm Chemicals site because it is located across the street.) Aberdeen residents [is less than] 40 years of age did not have plasma DDE values [is greater than or equal to] 5. Among Aberdeen residents 40-59 years of age, 35% (20/57) of those who lived within a mile of any site had plasma DDE levels [is greater than or equal to] 5 ppb versus 15% (3/20) of those who lived farther away (p [is less than] 0.1). Fifty percent (14/28) of those who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site had plasma DDE levels [is greater than or equal to] 5 ppb versus 18% (9/49) of those who lived farther away (p [is less than] 0.05). There were no differences in the percentages of residents [is greater than or equal to] 60 years of age with DDE values [is greater than] 5 ppb by residential location near the dump sites, although small numbers make differences difficult to evaluate.

Mean plasma DDE levels among Aberdeen residents living within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site were statistically significantly higher than among Aberdeen residents living [is greater than] 1 mile from the site controlling for age (5.22 vs. 3.01 ppb, p = 0.0026). For no other site were there significant differences in the mean plasma DDE levels of residents who lived more than and less than 1 mile from the site. However, few residents lived within 1 mile of some sites, and some residents lived within 1 mile of more than one site (Table 3).

Table 3. Mean (SE) plasma DDE levels (ppb) by distance from
each dump site, age, and sex.

                    Age                  Mean            Range
Dump site   Sex     (years)        No.   (ppb)     SE    (ppb)

Farm
Chemicals
(Twin)      M       < 40            7     1.3     0.16   1-2.1
                    40-49           8     4.4     1.4    1-13.3
                    50-59          --     --      --     --
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    1     1.0     --     1-1.0
            F       < 40            7     1.2     0.14   1-2.0
                    40-49          12     6.6     1.9    1-25.2
                    50-59           8    10.5     3.5    1.4-31.8
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    4     8.9     4.7    1-22.1
            Total                  47
McIver
            M       < 40            1     1.4     --     1.4-1.4
                    40-49           1     1.0     --     1-1.0
                    50-59           2     5.3     3.4    1.9-8.6
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    1     1.0     --     1-1.0
            F       < 40            5     1.3     0.20   1-1.9
                    40-49           3     5.7     2.3    1.5-9.5
                    50-59           4    13.4     6.3    3.8-31.8
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    2     4.2     1.5    2.7-5.7
            Total                  19
Route 211
            M       < 40            3     1.3     0.27   1-1.8
                    40-49           1     1.8     --     1.8-1.8
                    50-59           2    12.3    11.3   1-23.5
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    2     4.2     0.25   3.9-4.4
            F       < 40            7     1.6     0.25   1-2.9
                    40-49           5     2.6     0.85   1-4.9
                    50-59           4     5.0     1.5    1-7.9
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60   --     --      --     --
            Total                  24
Geigy
            M       < 40            5     1.2     0.16   1-1.8
                    40-49           7     4.6     1.5    1.8-13.3
                    50-59           4     6.8     5.6    1-23.5
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    1     4.4     --     4.4-4.4
            F       < 40           17     1.9     0.22   1-4.0
                    40-49           8     3.3     1.1    1-10.4
                    50-59           5     2.8     1.1    1-6.4
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    3     9.9     6.1    2.8-22.1
            Total                  50

                                         Mean             Range
Dump site   Sex                    No.   (ppb)     SE     (ppb)

Farm
Chemicals
(Twin)      M       < 40            27     1.6     0.24   1-6.8
                    40-49           25     2.7     0.40   1-8.0
                    50-59           20     5.3     1.2    1-23.5
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    25     4.2     0.52   1-8.8
            F       < 40            54     1.8     0.13   1-4.7
                    40-49           45     2.5     0.33   1-10.4
                    50-59           19     3.8     0.62   1-8.9
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    39     5.1     0.68   1-23.9
            Total                  254
McIver
            M       < 40            33     1.5     0.20   1-6.8
                    40-49           32     3.2     0.47   1-13.3
                    50-59           18     5.3     1.3    1-23.5
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    25     4.2     0.52   1-8.8
            F       < 40            56     1.7     0.13   1-4.7
                    40-49           54     3.3     0.53   1-25.2
                    50-59           23     4.5     0.79   1-15.1
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    41     5.5     0.78   1-23.9
            Total                  282
Route 211
            M       < 40            31     1.5     0.21   1-6.8
                    40-49           32     3.2     0.47   1-13.3
                    50-59           18     4.6     0.70   1-12.2
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    24     4.0     0.56   1-8.8
            F       < 40            54     1.7     0.13   1-4.7
                    40-49           52     3.5     0.56   1-25.2
                    50-59           23     5.9     1.4    1-31.8
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    43     5.5     0.74   1-23.9
            Total                  277
Geigy
            M       < 40            29     1.6     0.23   1-6.8
                    40-49           26     2.8     0.41   1-8.0
                    50-59           16     5.0     0.73   1.7-12.2
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    25     4.0     0.54   1-8.8
            F       < 40            44     1.6     0.14   1-4.7
                    40-49           49     3.4     0.57   1-25.2
                    50-59           22     6.5     1.5    1-31.8
                    [is greater
                    than or
                    equal to] 60    40     5.1     0.68   1-23.9
            Total                  251

No one lived within 1 mile of Fairway six; 8 out of 19 who lived
within 1 mile of McIver also lived within 1 mile of Farm Chemicals;
0 out of 24 who lived within 1 mile of Route 211 also lived within 1
mile of Farm Chemicals; and 7 out of 50 who lived within 1 mile of
the Geigy site also lived within 1 mile of Farm Chemicals.

Women 40-59 years of age who lived within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site had higher mean plasma DDE levels than female residents who lived farther away (40-49 years: 6.6 vs. 2.5 ppb; 50-59 years: 10.5 vs. 3.8 ppb; Table 3). Assessing median versus mean values did not change conclusions. Linear regression analyses controlling for age, race, income, and having breast-fed showed that female Aberdeen residents 40-59 years of age who lived within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site had statistically significantly higher plasma DDE values than Aberdeen residents and comparison area residents who lived farther away (p [is greater than] 0.05). Fewer males than females who lived near the Farm Chemicals site participated in the study, and males tended to be younger than females, with none in the 50-59 year age range. Nonetheless, men 40-49 years of age who lived near the Farm Chemicals site tended to have higher average plasma DDE levels than men who lived farther away (4.4 ppb vs. 2.7 ppb, Table 3). Few Aberdeen residents [is greater than or equal to] 60 years of age participated in the study, although two 60-year-old women living near the Farm Chemicals site also had relatively high plasma DDE levels (8.5 and 22.1 ppb). Those residents 40-60 years of age who lived within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site before 1985 when the plant was in operation and before any remediation efforts took place had higher median DDE levels than those who moved there after 1985 (before 1985: men, 5.5 ppb, n = 5, mean age = 44 years; women, 9.5 ppb, n = 11, mean age = 51 years; after 1985: men, 1.7 ppb, n = 3, mean age = 42 years; women, 4.6 ppb, n = 11, mean age = 50 years). Although women 40-59 years of age living near the McIver site had higher mean DDE levels than residents living farther away, most (5/7) also lived within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site (Table 3).

Immune Marker Results among Residents of Aberdeen Versus Comparison Areas

Blood cell counts, lymphocyte phenotypes, and immunoglobulin levels. For the most part, results of the complete blood count, other lymphocyte phenotypic markers, and immunoglobulin levels did not differ between Aberdeen residents and residents of the comparison areas. However, the number of Aberdeen residents with a low percentage ([is less than] 8%, the lower limit of the normal reference range) of CD 16 cells, a marker for natural killer cells, was statistically significantly higher than the number of residents in the neighboring communities (30/150 (20%) vs. 13/150 (9%), p = 0.005].

Mitogen stimulation assay. Crude analyses showed that mean counts on the mitogen stimulation assay were statistically significantly lower among Aberdeen residents as compared to residents in the comparison areas for PWM only (Table 4). Results were significantly lower for Aberdeen residents compared to residents of the comparison areas for CON-A and PWM (p [is less than] 0.05) and suggestive for PHA (p = 0.08) after controlling for age, sex, and pack-years (Table 4). Six women (four in Aberdeen and two in the comparison areas) had mitogen stimulation assay counts in the clinically suspect range (PHA [is less than] 20,000, CON-A [is less than] 15,000, PWM [is less than] 10,000). Two of the Aberdeen residents lived within 1 mile of the Farm Chemicals site; one woman lived within 1 mile of another site, and the fourth did not live within a mile of any site.

Table 4. Mean ([+ or -] SD) of mitogen stimulation assay results
by study area.

                       Aberdeen                   Comparison
                   mean [+ or -] SD            mean [+ or -] SD
Mitogens               (n= 131)                    (n = 129)

PHA
 Crude         131,710 [+ or -] 38,583     133,563 [+ or -] 38,274
 Adjusted(b)   128,530 [+ or -] 3,197(c)   136,792 [+ or -] 3,223(c)
CON-A
 Crude          67,025 [+ or -] 23,716      71,508 [+ or -] 24,636
 Adjusted(b)    65,776 [+ or -] 2,108(c)    72,776 [+ or -] 2,126(c)
PWM
 Crude          34,714 [+ or  -] 20,845     39,930 [+ or -] 22,063
 Adjusted(b)    33,068 [+ or -] 1,878(c)    41,601 [+ or -] 1,893(c)

                         Reference
Mitogens       p-Value    ranges(a)

PHA
 Crude          0.70      > 71,969
 Adjusted(b)    0.08      > 71,969
CON-A
 Crude          0.14      > 31,328
 Adjusted(b)    0.02      > 31,328
PWM
 Crude          0.05      > 16,666
 Adjusted(b)    0.00      > 16,666

(a) Reference ranges indicate top 95% of the values of the
University of North Carolina Hospital normal controls.
(b) Controlling for age, sex, and pack-years. (c) Standard error.

As would be expected in a normal population, the results of the mitogen stimulation assays with the three different mitogens were highly correlated with one another: (PHA/CON-A, r = 0.73 p = 0.0001, PHA/PWM logged to reduce skewness, r = 0.56 p = 0.0001, CON-A/PWM logged, r = 0.69 p = 0.0001.

Micronucleus assay. There were no differences in micronucleus frequencies between the residents of Aberdeen and those in the comparison areas controlling for age, sex, pack-years, and scorer (e.g., mean percent of cells with micronuclei: Aberdeen, 1.49, SE = 0.077 comparison areas: 1.40, SE = 0.079; p = 0.40).

Immune Marker Results Among Residents Based on Proximity to the Dump Sites

Blood cell counts, lymphocyte phenotypes, and immunoglobulins. An immunosuppressive effect of living within a mile of any site was not supported by the results of the white blood cell counts, lymphocyte phenotypic marker assays, or the immunoglobulin assays after controlling for age, sex, and pack-years. There was a suggestion of a decrease in CD4 cells (percentage of total lymphocytes, p = 0.08) and an increase in CD8 cells (total, p = 0.09; percent of total lymphocytes, p = 0.07) among those living closer to the sites. This resulted in a slight drop in the CD4:CD8 ratio among those within a mile of any site (2.2 vs. 2.0, p = 0.13). The drop in the CD4:CD8 ratio was greater among those who lived farther than a mile from the Farm Chemicals site compared to those who lived within a mile of the site (all ages: 2.2 vs. 1.9, p = 0.05; 40-59 year olds, 2.4 vs. 1.9, p = 0.10). Of the immunoglobulins, only IgM appeared be statistically significantly associated with living within 1 mile of any dump site compared to living farther away. IgM was statistically significantly higher among residents living close to the sites whether or not we controlled for age, sex, and pack-years (143 vs. 123 mg/dL, p = 0.03).

Mitogen stimulation assay. All three mitogen stimulation assay results were lower among residents who lived within a mile of any dump site as compared with residents who lived farther away. The results were statistically significant for PWM after controlling for age, sex, and pack-years (p = 0.05; Table 5).

Table 5. Mitogen stimulation assay results by distance
from any dump site.

               [is less than or equal to] 1     [is greater than] 1 mile
                    mile from any site              from any site
                       (N = 90)                      (n = 170)

Outcome        Mean      SE      Mean      SE      p-Value(a)

PHA
 Crude(b)      131,805   4,102   133,065   2,928       0.80
 Adjusted(c)   129,874   3,863   134,087   2,773       0.38
C0N-A
 Crude(b)      66,745    2,435    70,575   1,900       0.23
 Adjusted(c)   66,024    2,549    70,956   1,830       0.12
PWM

 Crude(b)      34,832    2,298    38,610   1,641       0.18
 Adjusted(c)   33,567    2,283    39,278   1,640       0.05

(a) p-Value for the statistical significance of the difference
in mean values. (b) Crude p-values calculated by t-test.
(c) Adjusted for age, sex, and pack-years.

Micronuclei. Neither the total number of micronuclei nor the percentage of cells with micronuclei was associated with living within a mile of any dump site, controlling for age, sex, and pack-years. However, among those 40-59 years of age, both the number of micronuclei/1,000 binucleate cells and the percentage of cells with micronuclei were statistically significantly elevated among those who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site compared to those who lived farther away (number of micronuclei/1000 binucleate cells [is less than] 1 mile of Farm Chemicals: 21, n = 25; [is greater than] 1 mile from Farm Chemicals: 16, n = 92, p = 0.04: percentage of micronuclei [is less than] 1 mile from Farm Chemicals: 1.9, [is greater than] 1 mile from Farm Chemicals 1.4, p = 0.04).

Skin Test Results

Overall, residents of Aberdeen and the comparison areas did not differ with regard to the percentage of individuals with positive skin test results by sex (Table 6). Multivariate logistic regression modeling controlling for age and household income [is greater than] $20,000 confirmed these results. The number of positive responses was too small to assess effects of skin testing by distance from each dump site.

Table 6. Number and percentage of individuals with a positive
([is greater than or equal to] 2 mm) skin test by study area and sex.

                                              Comparison
                                   Aberdeen     areas
Skin test                          No. (%)     No. (%)     p-Value(a)

At least one positive skin test
 Males                             35 (74)     55 (85)        0.18
 Females                           59 (58)     44 (52)        0.41
At least two positive skin tests
 Males                             20 (43)     36 (55)        0.18
 Females                           27 (27)     18 (21)        0.40
Tetanus
 Males                             28 (60)     48 (74)        0.11
 Females                           45 (45)     33 (39)        0.47
Diphtheria
 Males                             14 (30)     24 (37)        0.43
 Females                           19 (18)     15 (18)        0.90
Streptococcus
 Males                              8 (17)     10 (15)        0.82
 Females                            6 (6)       4 (5)         0.73
Candida
 Males                              4 (9)      18 (28)        0.01
 Females                            7 (7)       5 (6)         0.78
Trichophyton
 Males                              4 (9)       6 (9)         0.90
 Females                            1 (1)       1 (1)         0.90
Proteus
 Males                             13 (28)     21 (32)        0.60
 Females                           24 (24)     13 (16)        0.16

Numbers of participants: Aberdeen, males, 47, females,
101; comparison areas, males, 65, females, 84.
(a) p-Values calculated by chi-square test.

Discussion

Summary of Results

Of 20 organochlorines tested, only DDE was detected in the blood of participants (except for one individual with heptachlor epoxide levels of 2 ppb). Age-adjusted mean plasma DDE levels were 4.05 ppb for Aberdeen residents and 2.95 ppb (p = 0.01) for residents of neighboring communities. Residents ages 40-59 years who lived within a mile of any site, but particularly the Farm Chemicals site, had higher plasma DDE levels than residents who lived farther away. Residents who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site before 1985 when the plant was in operation and before any remediation efforts took place also had higher plasma DDE levels than residents who lived there after 1985.

Overall, there were few differences in immune markers between residents of Aberdeen and the neighboring communities. When comparing Aberdeen residents to residents of the comparison areas, we noted that a) the number of Aberdeen residents with a low percentage ([is less than] 8%) of CD 16 cells, a marker for natural killer cells, was statistically significantly higher than the number of residents in the neighboring communities (20% vs. 9%, p = 0.005), and b) the results of the mitogen stimulation assay were statistically significantly lower among Aberdeen residents compared to residents in the comparison areas (CON-A, p = 0.02; PWM, p = 0.002). Aberdeen residents who lived within a mile of any dump site compared to all other study participants also had lower mitogen stimulation assay counts PWM, p = 0.05). IgM levels were statistically significantly higher among residents who lived within a mile of any dump site compared to residents who lived farther away (143 vs. 123 mg/dL, p = 0.03). Those who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site had a lower CD4:CD8 ratio than residents who lived farther away (1.9 vs. 2.2, p = 0.05). CD4 tended to decrease, while CD8 tended to increase. Residents 40-59 years of age, who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site had a higher percentage of cells with micronuclei than residents who lived farther away (1.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04). There were no consistent differences in response to the skin tests by residential location.

Plasma DDE Levels and Residential Location

It is not surprising that residents near the Farm Chemicals site had the highest levels of DDE (a metabolite of DDT) in their blood because, of the six sites, Farm Chemicals had the greatest amount of DDT contamination (13). Levels of plasma DDE in the study population overall were low as compared to nationwide levels measured during the late 1970s, shortly after the 1972 ban of DDT use in the United States. According to data from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) (31), median DDE levels were 12.0 ppb and 18.3 ppb for participants ages 25-44 and 45-74, respectively. More recent nationwide values are not available. A comparison of overall plasma DDE levels between residents of Moore County in this study and women in 24 counties in North Carolina from another recent study showed that DDE levels were of similar magnitude (32).

Organochlorines such as DDE are stored in adipose tissue for a long time. Blood levels are considered good indicators of DDE body burden, as adipose tissue and blood levels have been shown to be highly correlated (DDE: r = 0.95) (33). If current DDE exposure is not as high as past exposure, there may be some movement of the DDE from the fat tissue into the blood. Therefore, current plasma DDE levels reflect past as well as current exposures. The fact that residents who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site before 1985 had higher median DDE levels than those who moved there after 1985 suggests that exposure levels were higher in the past. In the phase I telephone survey, we found that residents who lived in Aberdeen before 1985 had a 2- to 3-fold higher risk of herpes zoster (which we used as an indicator of immune suppression) than residents of the comparison communities.

In previous studies, age, sex (34), race (35), breast-feeding, diet (largely fat consumption), and smoking (36) have been associated with increased plasma DDE levels. In this study, all of these factors were associated with increased DDE levels (12).

Route of Exposure

Although groundwater was a primary concern as a route of human exposure to the contents of the dump sites, it is not likely that groundwater was responsible for the "majority of the higher blood levels of DDE among Aberdeen residents. According to county groundwater flow charts (37), no pesticide contamination was expected in the groundwater in the area to the northeast of Farm Chemicals, where most of the people with plasma DDE levels [is greater than or equal to] 5 ppb lived. Current water consumption was not predictive of plasma DDE levels among individuals who lived near the Farm Chemicals site. The majority of people in that area received their tap water from the Aberdeen municipal water company (which derives its water from numerous wells in and around the town) and not from private wells. Similarly, groundwater flow near the other dump sites suggests that groundwater was not primarily responsible for the higher blood levels of DDE.

As Mobbs (16) explained is his 1948 letter, to protect workers at the Farm Chemicals plant, exhaust fans blew pesticide dusts that spilled during the bagging process out into the surrounding area, making air a likely route of exposure. Other sources of exposure may have included direct contact with the sites or eating contaminated fish from a nearby lake.

Organochlorines and Immune Markers

In the current study, a greater number of Aberdeen residents had low ([is less than] 8%) CD16 cells, a marker for natural killer cells, than residents of the comparison areas. Animal studies have noted a reduction in natural killer cell activity with exposure to organochlorines (38). Natural killer cells are involved in host defense against viral infections and possibly malignancies. Residents who lived within 1 mile of the dump sites had higher IgM levels than residents who lived farther away. Studies assessing the relationship between organochlorine exposure and immunoglobulin levels have produced conflicting results (12).

As in Backer's study of pet dogs (17), there was a suggestion of a decrease in the CD4:CD8 ratio in association with living near the dump sites, especially the Farm Chemicals site (2.2 for [is greater than] 1 mile from Farm Chemicals vs. 1.9 for [is less than] 1 mile from Farm Chemicals, p = 0.05). The literature on human studies contains mixed results. Workers exposed to chlorinated pesticides among other pesticides also experienced depressed CD4:CD8 ratios (males: controls, (n = 19), 1.98; workers, n = 19, 1.74, p = 0.02; females: controls, n = 18, 2.07; workers, n = 18, 1.63, p = 0.001) (39). On the other hand, individuals exposed to the termiticide chlordane at home or at work had a nonstatistically significant increase in their CD4:CD8 ratio (exposed 2.2, n = 27; controls, 1.9, n = 114) (40). Alterations in the CD4:CD8 ratio and antibody responses were the most predictive markers of the immunotoxicity of various chemicals in mice (41).

The results of the current study show an association between living near the dump sites and decreased mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative activity. McConnachie and Zahalsky reported an association between organochlorine exposure (chlordane) and decreased response to mitogen stimulation (PHA, CON-A, PWM) among people exposed at home or at work 2-10 years before their study. DDT has also been found to inhibit human lymphocyte PHA mitogenesis in occupationally exposed workers (42). Furthermore, blood levels of DDT and DDE were inversely correlated with PHA and CON-A mitogenesis in free-living bottle-nosed dolphins (43).

Lowered mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative activities indicate that both T and B cells are less responsive to stimulation by particular mitogens and, therefore, suggest that they are less able to initiate or augment an immune response to foreign agents. In states where there is substantial suppression of T and B cell function, there is increased susceptibility to infection (e.g., by viral and fungal agents) and to cancer.

As per the results of previous studies, factors associated with immune markers in the current study included age (44), sex (45), and smoking (46-48), although not every marker was associated with all three factors. Each factor was included as a potential confounder in analyses for consistency of reporting.

A statistically significant association between living near the Farm Chemicals site and higher micronucleus frequencies was noted among residents 40-59 years of age. Backer (17) noted a statistically significant elevation in the percentage of cells with micronuclei among dogs in Aberdeen compared to those in neighboring communities. Other investigators have found some organochlorines including DDT to be mutagenic (49-51).

Skin Test Results

No consistent differences in skin test positivity were found in association with residential location (Aberdeen vs. the comparison areas) evaluated separately by sex, controlling for age, race, income, and pack-years. There are few studies of this type with which to compare results. One study of Brazilian children exposed to DDT found no association between exposure and diphtheria immunization response (52). Street and Sharma (53) noted a decreased delayed-type hypersensitivity skin test response to tuberculin in rabbits exposed to DDT. Small numbers prevented adequate assessment of skin test reactivity by residential distance from the dump sites.

Bernstein and Storms (54) suggested that the Multitest device may not be as sensitive a measure of delayed-type hypersensitivity as intradermal testing methods. They report that in some studies, it has taken 96 hr for responses to occur using the Mulitest CMI skin test that took only 48 hr to appear using intradermal testing methods. It is possible that the lower response rate using the Multitest device could have led to an underestimate of the effects of exposure on skin test reactivity.

Limitations of the Study Design

This cross-sectional study was designed to assess the relationship between location of residence and markers of immune competence at one point in time. Thus, individuals who may have been affected by the chemicals in the dump sites could have moved or died before the study, and any association that may have existed between earlier exposure to the dump sites and the various immune marker outcomes may have been missed.

Furthermore, the immune system changes with time. Immune cells, which are among the shortest lived cells in the body, constantly turn over and are replaced by other cells. Exposures that occurred many years ago may have affected the immune systems of residents at that time, but those alterations are unlikely to be detectable at present. For example, immune changes returned to normal within 3 months among a group of occupationally exposed pesticide workers who left employment (55).

Another possible limitation of the study is that certain effects of exposure to the dump sites may be observable only in susceptible populations, such as young children who were not included in this study. Soviet studies indicate that children are particularly sensitive to pesticide-induced immunosuppressive effects (4).

Although the dump sites contained volatile organic compounds and metals as well as organochlorines, only organochlorines were measured in blood because they were the contaminants of greatest interest at the sites. Therefore, residential distance from the dump sites was used as a proxy measure of exposure to the sites in analyses with immune markers as outcome measures.

Multiple statistical comparisons could account for random inconsistent positive study results such as the greater number of Aberdeen residents with a low percentage of natural killer cells (CD 16 cells) and increased IgM levels, and inconsistencies in skin test results. Uncontrolled confounding by other environmental contaminants may also have accounted for some positive results. For example, we did not measure plasma PCB levels because they were not considered contaminants of the sites.

Although participation rates in the original phase I telephone survey study were about average for telephone surveys (Aberdeen 71%, comparison areas 62%), the participation rate in phase II was lower than desirable, at about 37%. Clinic study participants differed from telephone survey participants in that they were more likely to be female, white, educated, of higher income (income [is greater than] $30,000) and have had recreational exposures to the dump sites. Phase II participants from the comparison areas tended to be older and more healthy than telephone survey study participants.

Strengths of the Study Design

This study is the first to extensively evaluate the effects on the immune system of living near a hazardous waste site containing organochlorine pesticides. Participants for phase II were randomly selected from among those who participated in the original Phase I telephone survey study. Participants were screened to exclude individuals with temporary disturbances in immune markers (e.g,. those with acute illnesses and those on medications that affect the immune system). Participants from Aberdeen and the surrounding communities were enrolled in the study simultaneously. Rigorous quality control measures ensured reliable questionnaire and laboratory data. Many potential confounders were considered in the study design and analysis. Because groundwater was a concern as a possible route of exposure, many questions concerning source of tap water and amount of water consumed were evaluated. All study participants received their tap water from groundwater sources. There was ample power to determine whether residents of Aberdeen differed from residents of the comparison areas with respect to immune markers. For example, we could detect a 16% difference in the CD4:CD8 ratio with 80% power.

Overall Conclusions

Despite the large number of pesticides contained in the dump sites, of a panel of 20 organochlorines, DDE was the only organochlorine detected in the blood of 302 study participants (except for one individual with heptachlor epoxide levels of 2 ppb). Aberdeen residents ages 40-59 who lived near the dump sites, and in particular, near the Farm Chemicals site, had higher plasma DDE levels compared to Aberdeen residents and residents of the comparison areas who lived farther away. Levels of plasma DDE in the study population overall were low as compared to nationwide levels between 1976 and 1980, but similar to levels in a concurrent study in North Carolina. Although some statistically significant differences in immune markers were noted with respect to location of residence near the dump sites, the magnitude of the effects are of uncertain clinical significance. Most individuals had marker levels well within normal ranges. It is possible that higher level exposures in the past resulted in immune marker changes that were not detectable in the current study due to the recovery of the immune system. In fact, residents who lived within a mile of the Farm Chemicals site before 1985 when the plant was in operation and before any remediation efforts took place had higher median DDE levels than those who moved there after 1985. Soil and groundwater remediation efforts which have already taken place should limit further exposure to the contents of the dump sites.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

(1.) Vine MF, Weigle K, Stein L, Backer L, Degnan D, Arndt V, Schroeder J. Environmental Exposures and their Effects on the Immune System. Report no. PB99-111221. Atlanta, GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1998.

(2.) Barnett JB, Rodgers HE. Pesticides. In: Immunotoxicology and Immunopharmacology, 2nd ed (Dean JH, Luster MI, Munson AE, Kimber I, eds). New York Raven Press, 1994;191-212.

(3.) Thomas PT, Busse WW, Kerkvliet NI, Luster MI, Munson AE, Murray M, Roberts D, Robinson M, Silkworth J, Sjoblad R, et al. Immunologic effects of pesticides. In: The Effects of Pesticides on Human Health. Advances in Modern Environmental Toxicology, Vol 18 (Baker SR, Wilkinson CF, eds). Princeton, NJ:Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., 1990;261-295.

(4.) Repetto R, Baliga SS. Pesticides and the immune system: the public health risks. Baltimore, MD:World Resources Institute, 1996.

(5.) Snyder CA. Organic solvents. In: Immunotoxicology and Immunopharmacology, 2nd ed (Dean JH, Luster MI, Munson AE, Kimber I, eds). New York:Raven Press, 1994;183-190.

(6.) Burns LA, Meade BJ, Munson AE. Toxic response of the immune system. In: Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. 5th ed. New York:McGraw Hill, 1996;355-402.

(7.) National Research Council. Biological Markers in Immunotoxicology. Washington, DC:National Academy Press, 1992.

(8.) Druet P. Metal-induced autoimmunity. Hum Exp Toxicol 14:120-121 (1995).

(9.) Lawrence DA. Posited mechanisms of metal immunotoxicity. Hum Exp Toxicol 14:114-116 (1995).

(10.) Zelikoff JT, Smialowicz R, Bigazzi PE, Goyer RA, Lawrence DA, Maibach HI, Gardner D. Immunomodulation by metals (symposium overview). Fundam Appl Toxicol 22:1-7 (1994).

(11.) Ardnt V, Vine MF, Weigle K. Environmental chemical exposures and risk of herpes zoster. Environ Health Perspect 107:835-841 (1999).

(12.) Vine MF, Stein L, Weigle K, Schroeder J, Degnan D, Tse CK J, Backer L. Plasma DDE levels and immune response. Am J Epidemiol (in press).

(13.) U.S. EPA. Baseline Risk Assessment, Aberdeen Pesticides Dumps Site, Moore County, North Carolina. Atlanta, GA:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990.

(14.) U.S. EPA, Superfund Fact Sheet Update, Geigy Chemical Corporation Site, Atlanta, GA:Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.

(15.) ATSDR. Site Review and Update - The Aberdeen Pesticides Dumps Site, Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina. Cerclis no. NCD980843346. Atlanta GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1992.

(16.) Mobbs R. Toxicity of hexachlorocyclohexane in scabies. JAMA 138(17):1253 (1948).

(17.) Backer LC. Pet dogs as sentinels for human exposure to environmental pollution. In: Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change (Butterworth FM, Corkum LD, Guzman-Rincon J, eds.) New York:Plenum Press, 1995;193-206.

(18.) Lopez-Avila V, Benedicto J, Milanes J, Beckert WF. Project Summary: Evaluation of Sample Extract Cleanup Using Solid-phase Extraction Cartridges. EPA/600/S489/049. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990.

(19.) Saady J, Poklis A. Determination of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides by solid-phase extraction and capillary GC with electron capture detection. J Anal Toxicol 14(5):301-304 (1990).

(20.) Earley R. Personal communication.

(21.) Hale L. Personal communication.

(22.) Tamul KR, O'Gorman MR, Donovan M, Schmitz JL, Folds JD. Comparison of a lysed whole blood method to purified cell preparations for lymphocyte immunophenotyping: differences between healthy controls and HIV-positive specimens. J Immunol Methods 167(1-2):237-243 (1994).

(23.) 1994 Revised guidelines for the performance of CD4+ T-cell determinations in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43(RR-3):1-21 (1994).

(24.) Tamul KR. Personal communication.

(25.) Schett E. Personal communication.

(26. Vine MF, Stein L, Weigle K. Gender differences in response to the Mulititest CMI[TM] Skin Test in the general population. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 84:445-450 (2000).

(27.) Wilson WG, Aylsworth AS, Folds JD, Whisnant JK. Cartilage-hair hypoplasia (metaphysical chondrosdysplasia, type McKusick) with combined immune deficiency: variable expression and development of immunotoxic function in sibs. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 14(6A):117-129 (1978).

(28.) Erexson GL, Kligerman AD. A modified mouse peripheral blood lymphocyte culture system for cytogenetic analysis. Environ Mol Mutagen 10:377-386 (1987).

(29.) Erexson GL, Kligerman AD, Bryant MF, Sontag MR, Halperin EC. Induction of micronuclei by X-radiation in human, mouse and rat peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res 253(2):193-198 (1991).

(30.) Kleinbaum D, Kupper L, Muller K. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Boston, MA:PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1988.

(31.) Murphy R, Harvey C. Residues and metabolites of selected persistent halogenated hydrocarbons in blood specimens from a general population survey. Environ Health Perspect 60:115-120 (1985).

(32.) Schildkraut JM, Demark-Wahnefried W, DeVoto E, Hughes C, Laseter JL, Newman B. Environmental contaminants and body fat distribution. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey 8(2):179-183 (1999).

(33.) Radomsky JL, Deichmann WB, Rey AA, Merkin T. Human pesticide blood levels as a measure of body burden and pesticide exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 20:175-185 (1971).

(34.) Wolff MS, Anderson HA, Selikoff IJ. Human tissue burdens of halogenated aromatic chemicals in Michigan. JAMA 247:2112-2116 (1982).

(35.) Kutz FW, Yobs AR, Strassman SC. Racial stratification of organochlorine insecticide residues in human adipose tissue, J Occup Med 19(9):619-622 (1977).

(36.) Rogan W J, Gladen BC, McKinney JD, Barreras N, Hardy P, Thullen J, Tinglestad J, Tully M. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene (DDE)in human milk: effects of maternal factors and previous lactation. Am J Public Health 76:172-177 (1986).

(37.) McElveen R. Personal communication.

(38.) Cornacoff JB, Lauer LD, House RV, Tucker AN, Thurmond LM, Vos JG, Working PK, Dean JH. Evaluation of the immunotoxicity of B-hexachlorocyclohexane (B-HCH). Fundam Appl Toxicol 11:293-299 (1988).

(39.) Klucinski P, Hyrcek A, Stasiura-Zielinska H, Kossmann S, Tustanowski J, Friedek D, Kaminska-Kolodziej B. Humoral and cellular immunity rates in chemical plant workers employed in the production of liquid pesticides. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 9(2):103-110 (1996).

(40.) McConnachie PR, Zahalsky AC. Immune alterations in humans exposed to the termiticide technical chlordane. Arch Environ Health 47(4):295-301 (1992).

(41.) Luster MI, Portier C, Pait GG, White KL, Gennings C, Munson AE, Rosenthal G. Risk assessment in immunotoxicology. I: Sensitivity and predictability of immune tests. Fundam Appl Toxicol 18:200-210 (1992).

(42.) Lee TP, Moscati R, Park BH. Effects of pesticides on human leukocyte functions. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 23:597-609 (1979).

(43.) Lahvis GP, Wells RS, Kuehl DW, Stewart JL, Rhinehart HL, Via CS. Decreased lymphocyte responses in free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) are associated with increased concentrations of PCBs and DDT in peripheral blood. Environ Health Perspect 103(suppl 4):67-72 (1995).

(44.) Born J, Uthgenannt D, Dodt C, Nunninghoff D, Ringvolt E, Wagner T, Fehm HL Cytokine production and lymphocyte subpopulations in aged humans. An assessment during nocturnal sleep. Mech Ageing Dev 84(2):113-126 (1995).

(45.) Dworsky R, Paganini-Hill A, Ducey B, Hechinger M, Parker JW. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping in an elderly population: age, sex and medication effects--a flow cytometry study. Mech Ageing Dev 48(3):255-266 (1989).

(46.) Meliska C J, Stunkard ME, Gilbert DG, Jensen RA, Martinko JM. Immune function in cigarette smokers who quit smoking for 31 days. J Allergy Clin Immunol 95(4):901-910 (1995).

(47.) Geng Y, Savage SM, Johnson L J, Seagrave J, Sopori ML Effects of nicotine on the immune response. I. Chronic exposure to nicotine impairs antigen receptor-mediated signal transduction in lymphocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 135(2):268-278 (1995).

(48.) Inoue C, Takeshita T, Kondo H, Morimoto K. Healthy lifestyles are associated with higher lymphokine-activated killer cell activity. Prey Med 25(6):717-724 (1996).

(49.) Rabello MN, Dealmeida WF, Pigati P, Ungaro MT, Murata T, Perira CA, Becak W. Cytogenetic study on individuals occupationally exposed to DDT. Mutat Res 28:449-454 (1975).

(50.) Garrett NE, Stack HF, Waters D. Evaluation of the genetic activity profiles of 65 pesticides. Mutat Res 168:301-325 (1986).

(51.) IARC. Occupational exposures in insecticide application and some pesticides. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 53:5-586 (1991).

(52.) Costa MCL, Schvartsman S. Antibody titres and blood levels of DDT after diphtheria immunization in children. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 41(suppl 2):249(1977).

(53.) Street JC, Sharma RP. Alteration of induced cellular and humoral immune responses by pesticides and chemicals of environmental concern: quantitative studies of immunosuppression by DDT, arochlor 1254, carbaryl, carbofuran and methylparathion. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 32(3): 587-602 (1975).

(54.) Bernstein L, Storms WW. Summary statements of practice parameters for Allergy Diagnostic Tests. Ann Allergy 75(Part II): 543-625 (1995).

(55.) Khan SA, Ali SA. Assessment of certain hematological responses of factory workers exposed to pesticides. Environ Contamin Toxicol 51:740-747 (1993).

Address correspondence to M.F. Vine, Box 2949 Hanes House, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: VINE0002@ mc.duke.edu

We thank M. Wiley for her tireless data collection efforts, W.G. Steele for drawing blood and administering the skin tests, D. Sims for performing the mitogen stimulation assays and the micronucleus assay, and A. Tuck, E. Powell, T.L. James, and N. Rustam for helping with preparation of the manuscript.

This study was supported by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, grant H75/ATH499788. The mitogen stimulation assays were supported by the Health Effects Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, grant CR820076.

Received 13 July 1999; accepted 11 July 2000.

Marilyn F. Vine,(1) Leonard Stein,(2) Kristen Weigle,(1) Jane Schroeder,(1) Darrah Degnan, (1) Chiu-Kit J. Tse,(1) Carol Hanchette,(3) and Lorraine Backer(4)

(1)Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; (2)Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; (3)North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics, Raleigh, North Carolina; (4)Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, USA