Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,383,293 articles and books

Effects of UV-curing exposure on adhesion.

The physical properties of UV-cured materials are substantially affected by the lamp systems used to cure them. The development of the intended properties, whether a varnish, an ink, or an adhesive, can depend on how well these lamp factors are designed and managed. The four key factors of UV exposure are: UV irradiance (or intensity), spectral distribution (wavelengths) of UV, time-integrated UV energy (or "dose"), and infrared radiation. Inks and varnishes will exhibit very different response to peak irradiance or energy, as well as to different UV spectra. One of the properties that is the most sensitive to peak irradiance and correct wavelength is depth of cure and resulting adhesion. Depending on the irradiance profile, some of the UV energy is wasted and does not assist in deep cure and adhesion. The ability to match the various lamp characteristics to the optical properties of the curable materials widens the range in which UV curing is a faster, more efficient production process.



There are a number of factors (outside of the formulation itself) which affect the curing and the consequent performance of the UV-curable material. These factors are the optical and physical characteristics of the curing system. (1) Among them are the key elements of the UV source:

UV Irradiance is the radiant power, within a stated wavelength range, arriving at a surface per unit area, usually expressed in watts or milliwatts per square centimeter. Irradiance varies with lamp output power, efficiency and focus of its reflector system, and distance to the surface. (It is a characteristic of the lamp geometry and power, so does not vary with speed). The intense peak of focused power directly under a lamp is referred to as "peak irradiance." Irradiance incorporates all of the individual effects of electrical power, efficiency, radiant output, reflectance, focus, bulb size, and lamp geometry. When irradiance is measured in any specific range of wavelengths, it is called "effective irradiance."


UV Energy Density is the radiant energy, within a stated wavelength range, arriving at a surface per unit area. Sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) referred to as "dose," it is the total accumulated photon quantity arriving at a surface, per unit area. Energy is inversely proportional to speed under any given light source, and proportional to the number of exposures (for example, rows of lamps). It is the time-integral of irradiance to which a surface is exposed as it travels past a lamp or a sequence of lamps, usually expressed in joules or millijoules per square centimeter. (Unfortunately, no information regarding irradiance, irradiance profile, or peak can be derived from a measurement of energy (dose), although many researchers and formulators continue to use this measure alone). In this paper, "energy" will be taken to mean "energy per unit area."

Spectral Distribution is the relative radiant energy as a function of wavelength or wavelength range. It is the wavelength distribution of radiant energy emitted by a source or arriving at a surface. It may be expressed in power units or in relative (normalized) terms. Analyzing the radiant energy from a bulb by grouping spectral energy into 10-nanometer bands yields a distribution plot (or table) which is more convenient to apply to spectral power and energy calculations than fine-resolution data. This distribution may be applied to the radiant output of a lamp, or to the irradiance at a surface.

Infrared Radiance is the amount of infrared energy emitted by the quartz envelope of the UV source. The heating effect it produces may be a benefit or a nuisance. (IR and its control are addressed in other papers (2)). This is difficult to measure, so it is often easier to measure its effect on the temperature of the work surface.


All inks, coatings, or adhesives will absorb the UV arriving at the surface, but the radiant power available deeper within the film will depend on the absorption in the film. The higher the radiant power at the surface, the higher the power at any depth within the material.

The reduction of light energy as it passes into or through any material is described by the Beer-Lambert law. Energy which is not absorbed in an upper layer of the film and not reflected is transmitted and available to lower layers, according to the following expression:

[I.sub.a[lambda]] = [[I.sub.o[lambda]](1 - [10.sup.-[A.sub.[lambda]]])/d]

[I.sub.o] is the incident energy at wavelength [lambda], [I.sub.a] is the energy absorbed, [A.sub.[lambda]] is absorbance at wavelength [lambda], and d is the depth from the surface or film thickness.

Examining this law as it relates to radiant power absorbed in the top (surface) and the bottom (contact layer) of a film permits the analysis shown in Figure 1. By dividing the Beer-Lambert expression into 100 "layers," we can display the relative UV flux through the extreme top layer and the extreme bottom layer. The relationship shown in Figure 1 is true for any film of any physical thickness. (3)

Calculation further shows that the optimum (theoretical) absorbance of a film of any thickness is 0.4 to 0.43. In other words, the maximal absorption in the bottom layer occurs when there is a "best" combination of film thickness and absorption. (4) As we see, this ideal condition does not often occur in practical inks and coatings, as it represents a very low absorbance (very transparent) film. Figure 1 also illustrates that even at the best conditions, energy absorbed at the top surface is 2 1/2 to 3 times the energy absorbed at the bottom. For a film with an absorbance of 3.0, this ratio of top to bottom power is approximately one thousand.


For any film with a fixed spectral absorbance, the only way to increase [I.sub.a] (photon fluence rate) at any depth is to increase irradiance, [I.sub.o], at the surface.


Peak irradiance is the highest power level of radiant energy at the work surface. Typical irradiance profiles are illustrated in Figure 2.

All three lamps illustrated in Figure 2 deliver the same total energy to a surface passing under them, but at different irradiance levels (note that the area under each curve is the same but the peak is very different). These bulbs have the same electrical power input ("watts per cm") but are of different diameters, the smallest yielding the highest peak.

The elliptical reflector is generally the highest efficiency of reflector, as it has the greatest "wrap," or included angle of reflected energy about the bulb. Often reflector shapes other than the simple ellipse are considered. Table 1 shows the relative merits, measured by speed to achieve cure of a black screen ink. This demonstrates the effects of bulb diameter and reflector geometry with lamps of the same power, but different peak irradiance and optical efficiency. (5)


Controlling maximum peak irradiance is principally through the selection of lamp geometry, because it is integrally associated with reflector design and bulb diameter. Reflector shape (e.g., elliptical or parabolic), reflectivity and precision of shape, bulb diameter, radiant efficiency, and electrical power input will contribute to peak irradiance at any distance from the lamp.


Energy density (dose) is the most commonly reported measure of UV exposure, but when referenced alone, without other information, it is an incomplete specification. Energy is included here as an important measure in process specification because it is the only one that incorporates the factor of time. The specific wavelength range must be reported also, as it will vary with different types of measuring instruments. Most radiometers measure irradiance but calculate energy electronically. Radiachromic films record cumulative exposure (energy) only.


The measurement of energy density incorporates irradiance profile, the wavelength range of interest, and time. The exposure profile is characteristic of any lamp design. It is not possible to increase the peak-to-energy ratio of a lamp--this is determined by its design. Increasing lamp power does not alter the peak-to-energy ratio (at any speed). Typically, once a lamp is selected, the only controllable variables in a curing process are speed and lamp power. This gives the (unfortunate) impression that energy (dose) is the only measurement needed. It also leads to the unfortunate conclusion that increasing electrical power is the only way to increase irradiance.


The cured properties of clear coatings and varnishes (low absorbance) tend to correspond to the total energy applied. In other words, their practical cure speed may be increased by increasing the UV power, somewhat independently of irradiance or irradiance profile. Increasing the number of exposures under second or successive lamps will increase cure speed incrementally, but not proportionally.

Materials with a higher optical density will exhibit higher absorption of UV power, resulting in diminished power at depths within the film. These more optically thick materials (see Figure 1) may exhibit loss of throughcure or adhesion, as energy decreases with increase of speed, for example. More opaque materials will tend to show more dependency on the intensity, or peak irradiance to achieve throughcure.


An easy laboratory test to determine the extent to which a coating or ink is affected by peak irradiance is to compare the cure achieved with a test lamp at a high peak of focus with the cure achieved when the lamp is out of focus (low peak of irradiance). If the results are the same, the material is relatively insensitive to the irradiance profile. If the effect of peak is significant, then increasing the peak will improve the speed performance, most often evidenced by adhesion behavior. (If a high-peak lamp is not available, this appraisal cannot be performed).


Figure 3 illustrates the absorption of radiant energy in a UV-curable film. Clearly, varnishes and clear coatings will absorb different energies, even in the same thickness of film.


All inks and coatings each have their own characteristic spectral absorbance, ranging from high absorbance of short UV wavelengths, to lower absorbance for longer wavelengths. (5) Spectral absorptivity is a key factor in determining the best wavelengths for most effective curing.

A Simple Method to Determine Spectral Absorption

The absorption of a film can be demonstrated with even the simplest of instruments. A black screen ink and a clear coating were compared by printing them on a quartz plate, and measuring the effective transmission with a multi-band radiometer (Tables 2 and 3). This simple measurement demonstrates the fact that the absorption is different at different wavelength bands, and is very different for materials of different absorptivity.

A quartz plate is used as the substrate. The ink was screened with a #355 mesh, yielding a film of approximately .7 mil (18 micron). Measurements were made with the quartz plate over the radiometer, before and after printing, thus eliminating (or reducing) the effect of the quartz plate transmission and reflectance. The radiometer was an EIT UV Power Puck[R] (modified for high irradiance); the lamp was a Fusion UV 1600 (240 W/cm) with a 13 mm diameter "D" bulb. These results are shown in Table 2.


The same set of measurements was made on a clear press varnish (GPI Sun Chemical), with a film thickness of 0.5 mil (13 micron), and is shown in Table 3. The radiometer was a UV Power Puck (modified for high irradiance); the lamp was a Fusion UV 1600 (240 W/cm) with a 13 mm diameter "H" (mercury) bulb.


The combined effects of spectral absorptivity and physical thickness result in a distinct ratio of photon flux through the top of the film and the bottom. When this ratio is greater than 10, the film can be described as "optically thick." A film can be optically thick to short wavelengths, while being optically thin to longer wavelengths, but the ratio of flux will be fixed for any specific wavelength.


As illustrated in Figure 2, different configurations of lamps will have different irradiance profiles. If we are interested in the peak irradiance (intensity) in relation to the shape or width of the profile, we can examine this ratio. A highly focused lamp will have a higher ratio than a lamp system that is poorly focused or has been moved out of focus. In fact, the peak of the profile curve is the peak of irradiance, and the area under the curve is proportional to energy. Peak irradiance is not a function of speed, but is a consequence of lamp configuration and power.


A Dramatic Illustration of the Effect of Peak Irradiance-Screen Ink Adhesion

Table 4 is typical "cure" data for a black screen ink. NorCote #1019 black screen ink was printed onto a polycarbonate substrate with a 355 mesh screen, yielding approximately 0.7 mil (18 micron) film thickness. A cure ladder (results with increasing speed) was run with a Fusion UV F600 (600 W/cm electrical input) lamp, with a 13 mm diameter "D" bulb. Peak-to-energy ratio was varied by successively moving the lamp out of focus (an easy technique of varying irradiance). The range of peak irradiance was nearly 7 to 1. Energy and peak irradiance were measured with an EIT Power Puck. Energy at higher speeds was calculated by applying the inverse speed relationship. Data point pairs (peak and energy required) represent achievement of successful cure, determined by satisfactory adhesion, measured with a traditional cross-hatch tape-peel test.


Successful cure speed of an optically thick film of an absorptive material is clearly affected by peak irradiance. To examine the relationship further, we can plot peak-to speed, and the correspondiding energy required (Figure 4). Again, each data point pair represents the speed up to which successful "cure" (adhesion) was achieved.

Experiment with Narrowed Exposure Width--Altered Irradiance Profile

In an experiment to explore the peak-to-energy ratio further, a slit aperture was placed in front of the lamp so that the peak irradiance is approximately the same as the test above, but the exposure profile is limited to a width of approximately one inch (25 mm), thus reducing the total energy, and increasing the peak-to-energy ratio. The slit aperture blocks the lower irradiance "tails" of the exposure profile, illustrated in Figure 5. The data is shown in Table 5 and in Figure 6.

It is easier to see the significance of this data when plotted on the same graph (Figure 7). The experiment not only demonstrates the fact that cure can be achieved under a variety of conditions, but that by altering (or selecting) the exposure profile, a significant difference in the cure efficiency can be achieved.


Examination of Figure 6 suggests that the same cure speed can be achieved with lamps or lamp geometries having different peak-to-energy ratios. However, the higher the ratio, the less total UV energy is required to accomplish cure. When UV energy is reduced, so is the radiant energy associated with visible and IR energy to which the surface is exposed. This will reduce the surface temperature of the cured film.


Flexographic inks are usually laid down at film thickness from 4-7 mm (.1-.25 mil). While they are inks and have a high absorptivity, the physically thinner film will exhibit less overall absorption than heavier screen inks.

Owing to the thin film section, even though of a high absorptivity, there will be less of the total incident energy absorbed in the film, leaving a higher radiant flux at the film-substrate boundary. This should make flexographic inks less peak-sensitive than screen inks.

Asmann (6) explores lamp factors as they affect cure of a flexo ink. In this experiment, UV energy is adjusted by varying transport speed, and peak is varied by setting the lamp progressively farther from the surface. The object was to examine cure with varying peak, yet nearly constant energy.

It is evident from the tape peel test data in Table 6 that adhesion is significantly affected by the irradiance level. The data clearly indicates that the adhesion is significantly influenced by the peak irradiance, and the relative contribution of peak and energy is consistent with expectation of a thin film of an absorptive material.


The "traditional wisdom" is that the cure requirement of clear coatings and varnishes can be expressed in energy terms only. From Table 7, it is understandable that a "clear" material can tolerate a wide range in irradiance before the radiant power level in the material is diminished to the point that cure is affected. Some previous studies have explored peak and its effect on depth of cure and conversion in clear material. (7)


A coating of approximately 0.5 mil (13 micron) of GPI Sun Chemical Suncure was applied to Lenetta paper, and a cure ladder run to determine simple loss of cure, determined by tack. The lamp was a Fusion UV F300 with an "H" bulb. Energy and peak in the UVAEIT and UVBEIT ranges were measured (Figure 8).

The surprise here is that the energy required to cure, rather than being constant, is also reduced with higher peak irradiance.

Jonsson and Bao (8) also demonstrate that there are significant differences in the double bond conversion at an upper and a lower layer of a clear coating film when exposed to a low-irradiance source, and that these differences are reduced when exposed to a high-irradiance source.


There are several factors that affect depth of cure--and consequently adhesion--in inks or coatings. The most important of these is spectral absorptivity of the ink or coating itself. A UV-curable material will have a distinct spectral absorptivity curve, depending on its ingredients. Monomers and oligomers will absorb in the short wavelength UV; photoinitiators will, of course, have their own characteristic spectral absorption, and pigments or other additives will extend the absorption into the longer UV.

High absorbance of inks and physically thick films cause a reduction in radiant power in deeper layers, resulting in adhesion failure. While the bulk of the film may be "cured," there is inadequate energy at the boundary with the substrate. A simple method of overcoming this is to increase irradiance. We can make several general observations:

* Energy alone is not an adequate specification of cure conditions;

* High irradiance is critical to achieving depth of cure for absorptive films;

* High irradiance can improve curing efficiency by reducing the energy required to cure.

The shape of the UV exposure profile--the rise to a peak of irradiance followed by a corresponding fall--is another source of some inefficiency. Because the irradiance profile has a somewhat complex shape, there is a portion of this profile that will not contribute to throughcure. Experiments reduced these tails of the typical curve in order to explore and demonstrate the benefit of increasing the peak-to-energy ratio of the profile.

"Wasted energy," in the form of exposure to wavelengths or irradiance levels that do not activate photoinitiators, is an inefficiency in UV curing. The UV energy (and other radiant energy) which is absorbed by the film is a function of its spectral absorptivity, irradiance at its surface, and time of exposure. Methods that can reduce the total energy delivered to a film, while accomplishing cure, will increase the efficiency of the process.
Table 1

Lamp Diameter "Index of
Reflector Type, Cure Speed Energy Effectiveness,"
(120 W/cm) (m/min) (mJ/[cm.sup.2]) Speed/Energy

9 mm, elliptical 21.2 140 151
23 mm, elliptical 13.6 200 68
23 mm, parabolic 12.1 190 64

Black screen ink on polycarbonate, 390 mesh

Table 2--Absorption of Energy in UV Screen Ink

 Radiant Power, mW/[cm.sup.2]
 U[V.sub.A](320-390 nm) U[V.sub.B](280-320 nm)

Top surface of ink 6660 1995
Top of substrate
 (bottom of ink) 138 157
Absorbed in ink 98% 92%
Available for cure at
 substrate 2% 8%

Table 3--Absorption of Energy in UV Press Varnish

 Radiant Power, mW/[cm.sup.2]
 U[V.sub.A] U[V.sub.B] U[V.sub.C]
 (320-390 nm) (280-320 nm) (250-260 nm)

Top surface of coating 2162 2161 254
Top substrate (bottom
 of coating) 1400 880 15
Absorbed in coating 35% 59% 94%
Available for cure at
 substrate 65% 41% 6%

Table 4--Successful Cure Speed Determined by Adhesion

Peak, mW/[cm.sup.2] UVA Energy, mJ/[cm.sup.2] UVA Speed, in/sec

 6730 365 28
 5260 536 22
 3430 558 18
 1640 587 14
 1060 1160 6

0.7 mil (18 micron) NorCote #1019 black screen ink, #355 mesh, on
polycarbonate, F600, "D" bulb.

Table 5--Successful Cure Speed Determined by Adhesion (Exposure profile
narrowed with use of 1 in. slit aperture.)

Peak, mW/[cm.sup.2] UVA Energy, mJ/[cm.sup.2] UVA Speed, in/sec

 6320 197 16
 4810 231 12
 2670 277 6
 1610 346 3
 1007 380 2

0.7 mil (18 micron) NorCote #1019 black screen ink, #355 mesh, on
polycarbonate, F600, "D" bulb.

Table 6--Flexographic Ink (from Asmann (6))

Peak Energy, Speed, Tape
mW/[cm.sup.2] UVA mJ/[cm.sup.2] UVA in./sec Peel

 2360 449 10 4.8
 1470 454 9.2 4.8
 1060 454 8.8 4.3
 770 441 8.3 4.4
 600 449 7.6 4.0

Cavanagh black flexo ink (Cavflex 60 black 20-165, E0613).

Table 7--Successful "Cure" of a Clear Coating

Peak, mW/[cm.sup.2] UVA Energy, mJ/[cm.sup.2] UVA Speed, in./sec

 1690 43 60
 1290 43 50
 770 53 35
 480 58 30

0.5 mil GPI Sun Chemical Suncure varnish.


(1) Stowe, R. W., "Practical Aspects of Irradiance and Energy Density in UV Curing," Proceedings, RadTech North America, 2000.

(2) Stowe, R. W., "Dichroic Reflectors Applied to High Peak Irradiance Microwave Powered UV Lamps," Proceedings, RadTech North America, 1992.

(3) Pappas, Peter S., "Formulation Strategies for UV Curable Adhesives: Photoinitiator and Light Intensity Considerations," Proceedings, RadTech Europe, 1991.

(4) Stowe, R. W., "Practical Relationships Between UV Lamps and the UV Curing Process Window," Proceedings, RadTech North America; 1994.

(5) Stowe, R. W., "Recent Developments in Microwave Energised UV Curing Lamps," Conf. Proc., Fachhochschule Munchen, Munich, 1992.

(6) Asmann, W., et al, "UV Curing of a Flexographic Ink with Minimum Substrate Temperature Rise," RadTech Report, Sept/Oct 1997.

(7) Schaeffer, W., Jonsson, S., and Amin, M.R., "Greater Efficiency in UV Curing Through the Use of High Peak Energy Sources," Proceedings, RadTech Europe 95, 1995.

(8) Jonsson, S., and Bao, R., "Depth of Double Bond Conversion as a Function of Absorbed Light Intensity," Proceedings, RadTech Asia, 2001.

by R.W. Stowe

Fusion UV Systems, Inc.*

Presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, November 12-14, 2003, in Philadelphia, PA.

*910 Clopper Rd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Technology Today
Author:Stowe, R.W.
Publication:JCT CoatingsTech
Date:Apr 1, 2004
Previous Article:Cool roofing: a really hot topic.
Next Article:A paradigm shift: the new role of heterogeneity and interactions.

Related Articles
New priming technology adhesion performance of UV-curable coatings on plastic.
Development and evaluation of terminally epoxidized triglycerides for coatings applications.
How to speed up the UV curing of water-based acrylic coatings.
UV-radiation curing of waterborne acrylate coatings.
Waterborne UV Curing is focus of Philadelphia Society.
Aspects of radiometry and process verification for 3-D UV processing.
UV-A curable polyurethane dispersions in wood coatings: reducing the hurdle of investment costs in UV equipment.
New low-viscosity acrylic-urethane prepolymers and their acrylated oligomers for moisture and UV-curable coatings.
Comparison of 1K UV primer vs. conventional 2K primers.
Adhesion, Part I.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters