Printer Friendly

Effect of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung on nutrient content and growth performance of cashew (Anacardium occidentale).

Introduction

The cashew (Anacardium occidentale) is a native of central and South America. Cashew is now grown in many parts of the world where its growth is not limited by cold. It is an important commodity crop with great potential as foreign exchange earner and source of industrial raw materials with the prospect of becoming a major commercial tree crop in Nigeria. Cashew is grown for its nuts and pseudo-apple from which products such as cashew juice, wine vinegar, jams chocolate, cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) and cooking oil are made [20]. Cashew is produce in almost 32countries of the world and it annual world production is about 400,000 tonnes and more than 50 percent of this production comes from South Asia and Eastern Africa, especially India and Tanzania. Nigeria produces 186,000 metric tonnes of nuts per year representing 9.0% of the world production this making Nigeria the 4th largest producing country in the world after Vietnam, India and Brazil [8].

Cashew is grown in many soil types of the savanna zones of Nigeria. It is less selective and demanding in terms of soil types and fertility requirement compared with other plantation crops [20]. Cashew as a result of its wide adaptation is often grown in very poor soil and this has affected its survival and establishment in most fields. In many cashew plantations, the establishment could be as low as 45%, while in acute situation it could be less.

Information concerning nutritional requirements of cashew is very scarce, this can be due to an earlier suggestion that cashew must be modest in it nutritional demand since it is found to be productive on soil too poor and dry for other crop [20]. The use of NPK fertilizer for cashew nutrition had been established (Lefebure 1970;23]. The wide spread deficiency of N,P, K and other macro nutrients in Nigeria soil, constitutes a serious limiting factor in the production of major food and fibre crop [9,6]. These macro nutrient deficiency is often corrected through the use of inorganic fertilizers, application of most these inorganic fertilizers on along term basis often lead to reduction in pH and exchangeable bases thus making them unavailable to crops and the productivity of crop decline [27]. In addition, the problem of affordability of the chemical fertilizer to farmers farmer and other attendant problems of fertilizer procurement and distribution make the use of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung a viable option [21]. The use of organic fertilizer to grow tree crops, especially cocoa, coffee and oil palm has been reported by various workers [5,11]. Application of compost improve the biological activities of the soil and has a direct impact on the sustainability of soil health [15].

Intensive use of some of these plant and animal wastes such as cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung had not been extended to cashew production.

Therefore the objectives of this study are to:

1. Determine the influence of combine effect and sore application of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung on growth performance of cashew seedlings in the nursery.

2. Determine the leaf nutrients of cashew seedlings and soil chemical composition as influenced by the organic amendments.

Materials and methods

The trial was conducted between September 2009 to February 2010 in Ibadan in the rain- forest zone of South Western Nigeria. The site was located at Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN). Ibadan, the capital of Oyo State is located on latitude 070 10E and longitude 030 52E on the humid tropical and rainforest zone of Nigeria. The rainfall is between 1200-1500mm per annum, with average temperature of 30.1[degrees]C.

Soil Sampling and Analysis Before Planting:

Soil samples were randomly collected from 015cm depth on the site, mixed thoroughly and the bulk sample was taken to the laboratory, air dried and sieved to pass through a 2mm screen for chemical analysis. The soil pH was read on the pH meter. Organic matter was determined by the wet oxidation method [25]. Soil P was extracted by the bray p1 extracted and measured by the Murphy blue coloration and determine on a spectronic 20 at 882um [14]. Soil K, ca and mg were extracted with imnh4 OAC, Ph was determined with flame photometer; Mg was determined with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The total N was determined by the Microkjedahl Method [7].

Processing of the Organic Residues Used for the Experiment:

The cocoa pod husk was obtained from crop processing unit Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria; Ibadan. The CPHA was sun dried for 3 weeks then burn to ashes. After cooling, the ash collected was bagged and kept in dry place ready for application. While goat manure was obtained from nearby pen in Akure Nigeria, the manure was air dried for a week under the shade.

Chemical Analysis of the Organic Materials Used:

Two grammes (2g) each of the organic material used were analyzed.

The nitrogen content was determined by Kjedahi method (Jackson, 1964) while the determination of other nutrient such as P, K, Ca and Mg was done using the wet digestion method based on 25-5-5mc of HNO3--H2S04--HClO4 acids (AOAC 1970). The K and Ca nutrient were read on flame photometer while Mg was read on atomic absorption spectrometer. The P content was developed into a yellow coloration with vanado molybdate solution and read on spectronic 20 at 442 um. The organic carbon (%) was determined by wet oxidation method through chronic acid digestion (Walkey and Black 1934).

Collection of Cashew Nut:

Disease free cashew nut was collected from cashew plantation; in Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN) Ibadan. The variety of the cashew nut was Brazilian large--Oro selection (10-12g in size). The nuts were dried and viability viability testing done by immersing them in sugar solution (0.68kg sugar in 4.5 liters of water) to identify the viable and high density nut for the study.

Nursery Establishment:

The bulk soil taken from (0-15 cm depth) was sieved to remove stones and plant debris and 2.5 kg of the sieved soil was placed into a polythene bag (25cm x 13 cm) in 2009. There were 7 treatments. The rate of application were 5t/ha CPHA, 5t/ha CPHA + 5t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 10t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 15t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 20t/ha GD, 20t/ha GD, 400kg/ha urea and the control (no treatment).

Two (2) cashew nuts were sown per polythene bag arranged in complete randomized block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The parameters such as plant height, leaf area, stem diameter and number of branch were recorded from 4 week after planting (WAT). Growth parameters were measured every four--week until 20 week after planting. Hand weeding was done at 3 week after planting and repeated at 6, 9, 12 and 16 weeks.

At 24 weeks after planting in the nursery the seedlings were carefully removed from the polythene bags for the measurement of fresh root and shoot weights, root length and shoot length. Then, they were oven--dried and both dried root and shoot weight were taken before finally analyzed for N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents.

At the time of taking the shoot weight, soil samples were taken from each poly bag and air dried and sieved for analysis of soil N, P, K, Ca, Mg, pH and OM as described earlier.

Statistical Analysis:

The growth data collected were analyzed using ANOVA. The treatment means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (P=0.05).

Results:

The soil chemical properties before planting are presented in Table 1. Base on the established critical level of soils in south west Nigeria, the soil was acidic with pH.5.26 and low in organic matter compared to the critical level of 3% organic matter [4].

The total nitrogen (0.43g/kg) is far less than 1g/kg which is considered optional for most crops (sobulo and Osiname,1973). While the available P is less than 10mg/kg P critical level [4]. The exchangeable K (0.12), Ca (0.10) and Mg (0.13mmol/kg) were lower than 0.20cmol/kg critical levels considered as adequate for crops (Folorunso et. al., 2000). The soil textural class is sandy loam and it is classified as Oniganbari soil series which is equivalent to Alfison (Isohyperthermic Oxic Paleustaif) [24].

The chemical analysis of the Organic fertilizer materials used for growing cashew seedling is presented in Table 2. Goat dung manure had the highest valves of N, P, and Mg compared to cocoa pod husk ash. While cocoa pod husk had the highest values of pH, C/N, K, Na, and Ca contents compared to Goat dung manure.

There were significant increases (p< 0.05) in the plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, leaf number, number of branch, root and shoot length, root and shoot fresh weight, root and shoot dry weight (kg) under different organic fertilizers compared to the control treatment (Table 3).

20t/ha of GD+5t/ha of CPHA treatment had the highest values of plant height, leaf area, stem diameter, number of leaf, number of branch, root and shoot length, root and shoot fresh weight, root and shoot dry weight of cashew seedling compared to 5t/ha CPHA alone, 20t/ha GD alone, 400kg/ha urea, and the control treatment respectively.

For instance, combined application of 20t/ha of GD+5t/ha of CPHA increased the plant height, number of leaf, leaf area, stem diameter, number of branch root and shoot length, dry and fresh root weight, dry and fresh shoot of cashew seedlings by 38%, 14%, 21%, 56%, 59%, 34%, 34%, 14%, 14%, 17%, 33%, respectively compared to sole application of 20t/ha of GD.

When compared with urea fertilizer application, 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA treatment also increased the plant height, number of leaf, leaf area, stem diameter, number of branch, root and shoot length, dry and fresh root weight, dry and fresh shoot weight of cashew seedlings by 25%, 28%, 9%, 46%, 59%, 19%, 18%, 32%, 14%, 6%, and 13% respectively.

All the treatment had better value of growth parameter of cashew seeding than that of control. There were significant increases (p<0.05) in leaf N, P, K, Ca and Na of cashew seedlings compared to control treatment. Among the organic fertilizer treatments, 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha CPHA had the highest values of leaf N, P, K, Mg and Ca while 20t of GD alone and 5t/ ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA also had the highest value of leaf Na and K. respectively compared with urea fertilizer treatment, 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA increased the leaf N, P,K, Mg, and Ca by 18%,56% 10%,12% 20%, respectively. However, urea fertilizer increased leaf N, K, and Ca by 48% 19%, and 38% compared to control treatment.

There were significant increase (p<0.05) in soil pH, N, P,K, Ca, Mg, OC, and OM compared to the control treatments under different organic fertilizer treatment (table 5) 20t/ha of GD treatment alone had the highest value of soil pH, OC, OM, and N, while combined 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA also had the highest values of soil P and K compared to others. For example, 20tons.ha GD manure increased the soil pH, OC, OM, and P by 13%, 0.3%,42%, 58%, and 6% compared to urea fertilizer treatment, 20tons/haGD increased soil Ph, OC, OM, N, P, K, Na, Mg, and Ca by 19%, 42%,42%, 56%,4% 20% 23% 29% and 28% respectively.

Discussion:

General increase in growth parameters such as plant height, leaf area, stem diameter, number of leaf number of branch, root and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight, dry root and shoot weight of cashew seedlings could be adduced to the nutrient contents of the organic fertilizers used which encouraged better seedling growth. This finding that the manure improved soil nutrients content is consistent with earlier finding of Adeniyan and Ojeniyi [3] and Moyin -jesu [10] who reported that organic manure supported crop growth performance and increased crop yield.

Combined application of 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA gave the best performance on the growth moderate least and soil fertility and this could be as a result of its high value of N, P, K, and moderate Ca and Mg. this finding also agreed with Odedina et. al., [19] who reported that goat dung when used as fertilizer, it improves soil fertility and vegetable yield.

The value reported for soil pH before the experiment was acidic but the application of cocoa pod husk ash increased the soil pH to a near neutral level.

This could be due to the fact that cocoa pod husk ash was naturally rich in K, Ca, and Mg which created a liming effect in soil and stability of the soil buffering capacity. The observation agreed with the work of Adeiran et. al., [2] and Moyin--jesu [12] who stated the use of ash along with urea would serve to control soil acidity problem that arise with respective use of urea. Again, soil pH had been reported to influence nutrient availability and update by crops [1] Goat dung and cocoa pod husk ash Complement each other to improve both the performance of cashew seedling and soil fertility than urea application. This finding agreed with that of Obi and Ofondiru [18] who reported that the continuous use of mineral fertilizers such as NPK, urea and ammonium sulphate had let to degradation of soil physical quantities and low soil organic matter level. The least values recorded for the soil, growth and leaf parameter of cashew seedling under the control treatment could be attributed to the initial poor soil fertility status and continuous cultivation of the land without replenishing with organic fertilizer. This observation agreed with that of Woomer and Muchena [26] who reported that continuous productivity of tropical soil is associated with maintenance of improvement of soil physical characteristics which can be further improved by applying organic fertilizer.

Conclusion and Recommendation:

The combined and sole application of organic fertilizers such as goat dung and cocoa pod husk ash increased significantly the soil and leaf N,P,K,Ca, Mg, soil pH and O.M, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaf, leaf area, root and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight, dry root and shoot weight of cashew seedling. It is therefore recommended that goat dung be applied at 20t/ha with cocoa pod husk ash at 5tons.ha (25g + 6.5g/2.5kg of soil) was the most effective fertilizer material for improving the nutrient availability and ensuring sustainable cultivation of cashew seedling on a commercial basis.

This recommendation corroborate with the fact that inorganic fertilizer are becoming too expensive to purchase by small scale formers of cashew seedlings. Besides, these organic fertilizers appear to have a strong, lasting beneficial effect on the soil properties and could be environmentally friendly.

References

[1.] Aduayi, E.A., 1980. Effect of ammonium sulphate fertilization on soil chemical composition fruit yield and nutrient content of Okra. Ife Journal of Agriculture. 2(1): 16-33.

[2.] Adediran, J.A., O.J. Idowu and R.A. Sobulo, 1999. Effect of nitrogen sources on profile distribution of nitrate nitrogen in a haplistalf in Nigeria of soil science, 11:103-117.

[3.] Adeniyan, O.N. and S.O. Ojeniyi, 2005. Effect of poultry manure and NPK 15-15-15 and combination of their reduced level on maize growth and soil chemical composition. Nigerian Journal of soil science, 15: 34-41.

[4.] Agboola, A.A. and R.B. Corey, 1973. Soil testing NPK for maize in the soils derived from metamorphic and igneous rock of western state of Nigeria. Journal of west Africa science Association, 17(2): 93-100.

[5.] Aisueni, N.O., U. Omoti, F. Ekhator and Oviasogie, P. 2000. Effect of Compost on soils supporting nursery seedlings production of oil palm. Nig. Journal of Tree Crop Research, 4: 43-51.

[6.] Adepetu, J.A., 1986. Soil fertility and fertilizer requirements in Oyo, Ogun and Ondo States. FDAIR, Federal Ministry of Agric. Res. (Publ.) Lagos., 101-200.

[7.] AOAC, 1970. Official method of Analysis 12th edition AOAC, V.A Arlinton, O.O Folorunso, A.A. Agboola and G.O. Adeoye, 2000. Use of three fertilizer models to calculate P and K nutrient requirement of mazie (zea mays L): Journal of Technical Education., 2(1): 105-110.

[8.] International on fertilizer industry Association. 2004. World cashew production. Retrieved in February 2006 from http: 11 www. Fertili. Org/ifa/ publicat / F< a/ 2004- 01pt. as. Lefevre, A. 1970. Indication preliminaries sur lar fertilization de I anacardier fruits (French) 25(9): 621-628.

[9.] Mokwunye, E.A., 1974. Some reflections on the problems of available in soils of tropical Africa, Samaru conference paper 14.

[10.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2007. Effect of some organic fertilizer on soil and coffee (Coffee arabica) on leaf chemical composition and growth University of Khartoum. Journal of Agriculture science, 15(1): 52-70.

[11.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2008. Comparative evaluation of different organic fertilizers on the soil fertilities leaf mineral composition and growth of dikanut (Irvingia gabonensis). Emirate. Journal of food and Agriculture; 20(2): 1-9.

[12.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2009. Evaluation of sole and amended organic fertilizer on soil fertiliy and growth of kola seeding (Cola acuminata). Pertanika journal of tropical agricultural science: 32(1): 17-23.

[13.] Moyin-jesu, E.I. and F.O. Adekayode, 2010. Comparative Evaluation of Different organic Fertilizers on soil Fertility improvement, Leaf mineral Composition and growth performance of African Cherry Nut (Chrysophyllum albidium L.) Seedlings. Journal of American Science. 6(8).

[14.] Murphy, J. and J.P. Riley, 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in waters. Analytical chemistry Act a 9: 69-82.

[15.] Nagara, J.S., D.R. Shanmukappa, K. Velmourougane, P.P. Selvam and R.P.A. Alwar, 2000. Production of compost from coffee pulp. In (Ed): Recent Advances in Plantation crops Research, 121-124.

[16.] Obatolu, C.R. and A.A. Agboola, 1991. Use of organic material to improve the quality and quantity of soil organic matter in the humid tropics. In Proc. second African soil. Sc. Soc. Cario, Egypt. Elgala et. al., (Eds). 175-182.

[17.] Obatolu, C.R., 1995. Nutrient balance sheet after coffee and mazie cropping in an Alfisol supplied with organic fertilizer in Ibadan- Nigeria in, proc of 3rd African soil science conference., 21-22.

[18.] Obi, M.E. and C.O. Ofondiru, 1997. The effect of soil amendments on physical properties of a severely degraded sandy loam soil in south eastern Nigeria.

[19.] Odedina, S.A., S.O. Ojeniyi and M.A. Awodun, 2007. Effect of Agro-industrial wastes on nutrient status and performance of tomato, Global J. ENVIRON. RES, 1: 18-21.

[20.] Ohler, J.G., 1979. Cashew Koninklijk instituut voor de tropen Armsterdam, 260.

[21.] Ojeniyi, S.O. and K.B. Adejobi, 2002. Effect of ash and goat dung manure on leaf nutrient composition, growth and yield of Amaranthus, nig. Agric. J., 33: 46-57.

[22.] Opeke, L.K., 1982. Tropical tree crops. Spectrum Book Ltd. Pub. Woye and Sons (Nig.) pp: 360-366.

[23.] Owaiye, A.R. and O.A. Olunloye, 1990. The effects of NPK fertilizer combinations on incidence of inflorescence blight disease of cashew at Ochaja In: Annual Report of Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, pp: 31.

[24.] Soil Survey Staff, 1999. Soil taxonomy. A basic system for soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA. Handbook No 436. D.C. Washington

[25.] Walkley, A. and I.A. Black, 1934. An examination of degtajaroff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid filtration. Soil science: 37: 27-38.

[26.] Woomer, P.L. and F.N. Muchens, 1993. Overcoming soil constraint in crop production in tropical Africa. Seminar proceeding on sustaining soil productivity in intensive African Agriculture organized by C.TA Wageningen held in Ghananov, 10-17: 45.

[27.] Moyin-Jesu, E.I. and F.O. Adekayode, 2010. Comparative Evaluation of different organic fertilizer on soil fertility improvement, leaf, mineral composition and growth performance of African cherry nut (Chrysophyllum albidium) seeding. Journal of American science, 6(8).

(1) Adejobi, K.B., (2) Famaye, A.O., (3) Adeniyi, D.O., (4) Orisajo, S.B. and (5) Adeyemi, E.A.

(1-5) Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, P.M.B. 5244, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria.

Adejobi, K.B., Famaye, A.O., Adeniyi, D.O., Orisajo, S.B. and Adeyemi, E.A.: Effect of Cocoa Pod Husk Ash and Goat Dung on Nutrient Content and Growth Performance of Cashew (Anacardium Occidentale)

Corresponding Author

Adejobi, Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, P.M.B. 5244, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria.

E-mail: jobikayode@gmail.com
Table 1: Pre--study Analysis of the Physicochemical
Characteristics of the Planting Soil.

Soil Properties          Value

Physical Properties
Sand                     642.02g/kg
Silt                     136.56g/kg
Clay                     139.55g/kg
Textural Class           Sand loam
Water Holding Capacity   36.70%
Chemical Properties
Soil pH (H20) 1:1        5.26
Organic Carbon           2.73g/kg
Organic Matter           0.55%
Total Nitrogen %         0.43g/kg
Available Phosphorous    2.00mg/kg
Exchangeable basis
K+                       0.12mmol/kg
Ca++                     0.10mmol/kg
Na+                      0.13mmol/kg
Mg++                     2.80mmol/kg
Mn++                     0.03mmol/kg
Exchangeable acidity
Al+++                    0.23mmol/kg
H+                       0.12mmol/kg
ECEC                     5.14mmol/kg

Table 2: Chemical Analysis of Organic Fertilizer used
for the Experiment.

Treatment   pH      C/N     N %    P mg/kg   K mg/L   Na mg/L
            (H20)   Ratio

* GD        6.38    62.00   1.26   40.36     2.29     1.67
* CPHA      7.21    95.00   1.02   16.26     5.01     3.06

Treatment   Mg mg/L   Ca mg/kg

* GD        1.90      3.40
* CPHA      1.80      3.60

Values are average of three replicates. * GD (Goat Dung).
* CPHA (Cocoa Pod Husk Ash)

Table 3: Effect of different levels of CPHA on growth
parameters of cashew seedlings in the nursery.

Treatment       Plant       Number    Leaf      Stem
                height      of leaf   area      diameter
                (cm)                  (cm)

5t/ha CPHA      37.43b      26.46ab   73.76bc   0.81b
20t/ha GD       33.42b      21.66bc   81.96bc   0.89b
10t/ha GD +     40.98b      26.73ab   77.40bc   0.83b
5t/ha CPHA
15t/ha GD +     42.74b      26.46ab   82.65bc   1.09ab
5t/ha CPHA
20t/ha GD +     60.85a      30.6a     92.84a    1.85a
5t/ha CPHA
5t/ha GD +      40.98b      24.0bc    71.24bc   0.90ab
5 t/ha CPHA
400kg/ha Urea   45.34ab     21.93bc   84.69ab   1.00ab
No treatment    33.42b      18.0c     64.59c    0.81b
(control)

Treatment       Number of   Root      Shoot
                Branch      length    length
                            (cm)      (cm)

5t/ha CPHA      1.60bc      16.12c    18.60c
20t/ha GD       1.46bc      15.33c    17.34c
10t/ha GD +     1.93bc      16.33c    18.72c
5t/ha CPHA
15t/ha GD +     2.75ab      16.00c    18.21c
5t/ha CPHA
20t/ha GD +     3.53a       23.33a    25.66a
5t/ha CPHA
5t/ha GD +      2.60ab      16.66c    18.90c
5 t/ha CPHA
400kg/ha Urea   1.46bc      19.00b    21.02b
No treatment    0.93c       12.33c    14.33c
(control)

Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter are
not significantly different from each other using Duncan Multiple
Range Test at 5% level.

Table 4: The yield parameter of cashew seedlings 24 weeks
after planting under different level of cocoa pod husk ash
and goat dung manure application.

Treatment                   Fresh    Dry Root   Fresh    Dry Shoot
                            Root     Weight     Shoot    Weight
                            Weight   (g)        Weight   (g)
                            (g)                 (g)

5t/ha CPHA                  24.66a   6.00b      43.00c   16.33g
20t/ha GD                   23.33b   6.33c      46.00c   22.66c
10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     24.00b   6.00b      34.66c   15.00c
15t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     25.66a   8.33b      42.00c   17.66c
20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     27.00a   7.33a      68.66a   27.33a
5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA      23.16b   5.00b      43.00c   16.33b
400kg/ha Urea               23.16b   5.00b      60.00b   25.66a
No treatment (control)      23.33b   5.33b      39.66c   14.66d

Treatment means within each column followed by the same
letter are not significantly different from each other using
Duncan Multiple Range Text at 5% level.

Table 5: The leaf chemical composition under
different level of GD + CPHA.

Treatment                   N %     P mg/kg   K mg/
                                              100g

5t/ha CPHA                  4.4b    15.8b     7.3f
20t/ha GD                   4.1bc   9.4d      13.3b
10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     4.0c    5.5a      9.7c
15 t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA    2.4d    8.8a      6.8g
20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     5.1a    18.8a     8.3d
5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA      3.9c    5.2g      14.5a
400kg/ha Urea               4.2bc   8.3e      7.5e
No treatment (control)      2.2e    14.7c     6.1h

Treatment                   Mg      Ca mg/    Na mg/l
                            mg/l    100g

5t/ha CPHA                  4.3a    15.2b     3.8c
20t/ha GD                   2.4d    12.0d     4.9a
10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     2.4d    8.0g      3..8c
15 t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA    2.4fd   9.4f      3.3d
20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA     2.5d    16.0a     3.9c
5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA      4.3d    11.2e     2.7e
400kg/ha Urea               3.8b    12.8c     3.9c
No treatment (control)      3.8b    8.0g      4.7b

Treatment means within each column followed by the same
letter are not significantly different from each other using
Duncan Multiple Range Test at 5% level.

Table 6: Soil Chemical Analysis after Experiment
under different levels of GD and CPHA.

                                    Organic     Organic
Treatment                Soil pH    Carbon      Matter
                         (H20)1.1   (OC) g/kg   (OM) %

5t/ha CPHA               5.89b      2.98a       2.96a
20t/ha GD                6.80a      2.99a       5.12a
10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   5.83b      2.41b       4.16a
15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   5.93ab     1.80d       3.10a
20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   6.74a      2.34b       4.03a
5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA    5.78b      1.99c       3.43a
400kg/ha Urea            5.50c      1.72d       2.97a
Control                  5.16c      1.67d       2.87a

Treatment                N %        P mg/kg     K mg/l

                         0.20a      4.71d       1.53b
5t/ha CPHA               0.48a      5.01c       0.70cd
20t/ha GD                0.41a      23.8a       1.75b
10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   0.24a      22.05b      2.27a
15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   0.40a      23.80a      0.98c
20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   0.36a      1.93e       0.97c
5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA    0.20a      4.83d       0.56de
400kg/ha Urea            0.12a      1.25f       0.45e
Control

Treatment                Na mg/l    Mg mg/l     Ca mg/l

                         1.08b      2.60a       4.70b
5t/ha CPHA               0.78c      1.70c       4.00c
20t/ha GD                1.16b      1.30d       3.70cd
10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   1.53a      2.30b       5.90a
15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   0.86c      1.40d       3.20de
20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA   0.93bc     1.70c       3.30de
5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA    0.60d      1.20d       2.90e
400kg/ha Urea            0.51d      1.30d       2.10f
Control

Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter
are not significantly different from each other using Duncan
Multiple Range Text at 5% level
COPYRIGHT 2011 American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Adejobi, K.B.; Famaye, A.O.; Adeniyi, D.O.; Orisajo, S.B.; Adeyemi, E.A.
Publication:Advances in Environmental Biology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:6NIGR
Date:Jun 1, 2011
Words:4606
Previous Article:An anatomical study of vascular system of spike: dynamics of central vascular bundles at successive internodes along the rachis of wheat.
Next Article:Detrimental effects of gestational exposure to 900mhz electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular phone on litter size and secondary sex-ratio in...
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters