Effect of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung on nutrient content and growth performance of cashew (Anacardium occidentale).
The cashew (Anacardium occidentale) is a native of central and South America. Cashew is now grown in many parts of the world where its growth is not limited by cold. It is an important commodity crop with great potential as foreign exchange earner and source of industrial raw materials with the prospect of becoming a major commercial tree crop in Nigeria. Cashew is grown for its nuts and pseudo-apple from which products such as cashew juice, wine vinegar, jams chocolate, cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) and cooking oil are made . Cashew is produce in almost 32countries of the world and it annual world production is about 400,000 tonnes and more than 50 percent of this production comes from South Asia and Eastern Africa, especially India and Tanzania. Nigeria produces 186,000 metric tonnes of nuts per year representing 9.0% of the world production this making Nigeria the 4th largest producing country in the world after Vietnam, India and Brazil .
Cashew is grown in many soil types of the savanna zones of Nigeria. It is less selective and demanding in terms of soil types and fertility requirement compared with other plantation crops . Cashew as a result of its wide adaptation is often grown in very poor soil and this has affected its survival and establishment in most fields. In many cashew plantations, the establishment could be as low as 45%, while in acute situation it could be less.
Information concerning nutritional requirements of cashew is very scarce, this can be due to an earlier suggestion that cashew must be modest in it nutritional demand since it is found to be productive on soil too poor and dry for other crop . The use of NPK fertilizer for cashew nutrition had been established (Lefebure 1970;23]. The wide spread deficiency of N,P, K and other macro nutrients in Nigeria soil, constitutes a serious limiting factor in the production of major food and fibre crop [9,6]. These macro nutrient deficiency is often corrected through the use of inorganic fertilizers, application of most these inorganic fertilizers on along term basis often lead to reduction in pH and exchangeable bases thus making them unavailable to crops and the productivity of crop decline . In addition, the problem of affordability of the chemical fertilizer to farmers farmer and other attendant problems of fertilizer procurement and distribution make the use of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung a viable option . The use of organic fertilizer to grow tree crops, especially cocoa, coffee and oil palm has been reported by various workers [5,11]. Application of compost improve the biological activities of the soil and has a direct impact on the sustainability of soil health .
Intensive use of some of these plant and animal wastes such as cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung had not been extended to cashew production.
Therefore the objectives of this study are to:
1. Determine the influence of combine effect and sore application of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung on growth performance of cashew seedlings in the nursery.
2. Determine the leaf nutrients of cashew seedlings and soil chemical composition as influenced by the organic amendments.
Materials and methods
The trial was conducted between September 2009 to February 2010 in Ibadan in the rain- forest zone of South Western Nigeria. The site was located at Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN). Ibadan, the capital of Oyo State is located on latitude 070 10E and longitude 030 52E on the humid tropical and rainforest zone of Nigeria. The rainfall is between 1200-1500mm per annum, with average temperature of 30.1[degrees]C.
Soil Sampling and Analysis Before Planting:
Soil samples were randomly collected from 015cm depth on the site, mixed thoroughly and the bulk sample was taken to the laboratory, air dried and sieved to pass through a 2mm screen for chemical analysis. The soil pH was read on the pH meter. Organic matter was determined by the wet oxidation method . Soil P was extracted by the bray p1 extracted and measured by the Murphy blue coloration and determine on a spectronic 20 at 882um . Soil K, ca and mg were extracted with imnh4 OAC, Ph was determined with flame photometer; Mg was determined with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The total N was determined by the Microkjedahl Method .
Processing of the Organic Residues Used for the Experiment:
The cocoa pod husk was obtained from crop processing unit Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria; Ibadan. The CPHA was sun dried for 3 weeks then burn to ashes. After cooling, the ash collected was bagged and kept in dry place ready for application. While goat manure was obtained from nearby pen in Akure Nigeria, the manure was air dried for a week under the shade.
Chemical Analysis of the Organic Materials Used:
Two grammes (2g) each of the organic material used were analyzed.
The nitrogen content was determined by Kjedahi method (Jackson, 1964) while the determination of other nutrient such as P, K, Ca and Mg was done using the wet digestion method based on 25-5-5mc of HNO3--H2S04--HClO4 acids (AOAC 1970). The K and Ca nutrient were read on flame photometer while Mg was read on atomic absorption spectrometer. The P content was developed into a yellow coloration with vanado molybdate solution and read on spectronic 20 at 442 um. The organic carbon (%) was determined by wet oxidation method through chronic acid digestion (Walkey and Black 1934).
Collection of Cashew Nut:
Disease free cashew nut was collected from cashew plantation; in Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN) Ibadan. The variety of the cashew nut was Brazilian large--Oro selection (10-12g in size). The nuts were dried and viability viability testing done by immersing them in sugar solution (0.68kg sugar in 4.5 liters of water) to identify the viable and high density nut for the study.
The bulk soil taken from (0-15 cm depth) was sieved to remove stones and plant debris and 2.5 kg of the sieved soil was placed into a polythene bag (25cm x 13 cm) in 2009. There were 7 treatments. The rate of application were 5t/ha CPHA, 5t/ha CPHA + 5t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 10t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 15t/ha GD, 5t/ha CPHA + 20t/ha GD, 20t/ha GD, 400kg/ha urea and the control (no treatment).
Two (2) cashew nuts were sown per polythene bag arranged in complete randomized block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The parameters such as plant height, leaf area, stem diameter and number of branch were recorded from 4 week after planting (WAT). Growth parameters were measured every four--week until 20 week after planting. Hand weeding was done at 3 week after planting and repeated at 6, 9, 12 and 16 weeks.
At 24 weeks after planting in the nursery the seedlings were carefully removed from the polythene bags for the measurement of fresh root and shoot weights, root length and shoot length. Then, they were oven--dried and both dried root and shoot weight were taken before finally analyzed for N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents.
At the time of taking the shoot weight, soil samples were taken from each poly bag and air dried and sieved for analysis of soil N, P, K, Ca, Mg, pH and OM as described earlier.
The growth data collected were analyzed using ANOVA. The treatment means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (P=0.05).
The soil chemical properties before planting are presented in Table 1. Base on the established critical level of soils in south west Nigeria, the soil was acidic with pH.5.26 and low in organic matter compared to the critical level of 3% organic matter .
The total nitrogen (0.43g/kg) is far less than 1g/kg which is considered optional for most crops (sobulo and Osiname,1973). While the available P is less than 10mg/kg P critical level . The exchangeable K (0.12), Ca (0.10) and Mg (0.13mmol/kg) were lower than 0.20cmol/kg critical levels considered as adequate for crops (Folorunso et. al., 2000). The soil textural class is sandy loam and it is classified as Oniganbari soil series which is equivalent to Alfison (Isohyperthermic Oxic Paleustaif) .
The chemical analysis of the Organic fertilizer materials used for growing cashew seedling is presented in Table 2. Goat dung manure had the highest valves of N, P, and Mg compared to cocoa pod husk ash. While cocoa pod husk had the highest values of pH, C/N, K, Na, and Ca contents compared to Goat dung manure.
There were significant increases (p< 0.05) in the plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, leaf number, number of branch, root and shoot length, root and shoot fresh weight, root and shoot dry weight (kg) under different organic fertilizers compared to the control treatment (Table 3).
20t/ha of GD+5t/ha of CPHA treatment had the highest values of plant height, leaf area, stem diameter, number of leaf, number of branch, root and shoot length, root and shoot fresh weight, root and shoot dry weight of cashew seedling compared to 5t/ha CPHA alone, 20t/ha GD alone, 400kg/ha urea, and the control treatment respectively.
For instance, combined application of 20t/ha of GD+5t/ha of CPHA increased the plant height, number of leaf, leaf area, stem diameter, number of branch root and shoot length, dry and fresh root weight, dry and fresh shoot of cashew seedlings by 38%, 14%, 21%, 56%, 59%, 34%, 34%, 14%, 14%, 17%, 33%, respectively compared to sole application of 20t/ha of GD.
When compared with urea fertilizer application, 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA treatment also increased the plant height, number of leaf, leaf area, stem diameter, number of branch, root and shoot length, dry and fresh root weight, dry and fresh shoot weight of cashew seedlings by 25%, 28%, 9%, 46%, 59%, 19%, 18%, 32%, 14%, 6%, and 13% respectively.
All the treatment had better value of growth parameter of cashew seeding than that of control. There were significant increases (p<0.05) in leaf N, P, K, Ca and Na of cashew seedlings compared to control treatment. Among the organic fertilizer treatments, 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha CPHA had the highest values of leaf N, P, K, Mg and Ca while 20t of GD alone and 5t/ ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA also had the highest value of leaf Na and K. respectively compared with urea fertilizer treatment, 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA increased the leaf N, P,K, Mg, and Ca by 18%,56% 10%,12% 20%, respectively. However, urea fertilizer increased leaf N, K, and Ca by 48% 19%, and 38% compared to control treatment.
There were significant increase (p<0.05) in soil pH, N, P,K, Ca, Mg, OC, and OM compared to the control treatments under different organic fertilizer treatment (table 5) 20t/ha of GD treatment alone had the highest value of soil pH, OC, OM, and N, while combined 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA also had the highest values of soil P and K compared to others. For example, 20tons.ha GD manure increased the soil pH, OC, OM, and P by 13%, 0.3%,42%, 58%, and 6% compared to urea fertilizer treatment, 20tons/haGD increased soil Ph, OC, OM, N, P, K, Na, Mg, and Ca by 19%, 42%,42%, 56%,4% 20% 23% 29% and 28% respectively.
General increase in growth parameters such as plant height, leaf area, stem diameter, number of leaf number of branch, root and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight, dry root and shoot weight of cashew seedlings could be adduced to the nutrient contents of the organic fertilizers used which encouraged better seedling growth. This finding that the manure improved soil nutrients content is consistent with earlier finding of Adeniyan and Ojeniyi  and Moyin -jesu  who reported that organic manure supported crop growth performance and increased crop yield.
Combined application of 20t/ha of GD + 5t/ha of CPHA gave the best performance on the growth moderate least and soil fertility and this could be as a result of its high value of N, P, K, and moderate Ca and Mg. this finding also agreed with Odedina et. al.,  who reported that goat dung when used as fertilizer, it improves soil fertility and vegetable yield.
The value reported for soil pH before the experiment was acidic but the application of cocoa pod husk ash increased the soil pH to a near neutral level.
This could be due to the fact that cocoa pod husk ash was naturally rich in K, Ca, and Mg which created a liming effect in soil and stability of the soil buffering capacity. The observation agreed with the work of Adeiran et. al.,  and Moyin--jesu  who stated the use of ash along with urea would serve to control soil acidity problem that arise with respective use of urea. Again, soil pH had been reported to influence nutrient availability and update by crops  Goat dung and cocoa pod husk ash Complement each other to improve both the performance of cashew seedling and soil fertility than urea application. This finding agreed with that of Obi and Ofondiru  who reported that the continuous use of mineral fertilizers such as NPK, urea and ammonium sulphate had let to degradation of soil physical quantities and low soil organic matter level. The least values recorded for the soil, growth and leaf parameter of cashew seedling under the control treatment could be attributed to the initial poor soil fertility status and continuous cultivation of the land without replenishing with organic fertilizer. This observation agreed with that of Woomer and Muchena  who reported that continuous productivity of tropical soil is associated with maintenance of improvement of soil physical characteristics which can be further improved by applying organic fertilizer.
Conclusion and Recommendation:
The combined and sole application of organic fertilizers such as goat dung and cocoa pod husk ash increased significantly the soil and leaf N,P,K,Ca, Mg, soil pH and O.M, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaf, leaf area, root and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight, dry root and shoot weight of cashew seedling. It is therefore recommended that goat dung be applied at 20t/ha with cocoa pod husk ash at 5tons.ha (25g + 6.5g/2.5kg of soil) was the most effective fertilizer material for improving the nutrient availability and ensuring sustainable cultivation of cashew seedling on a commercial basis.
This recommendation corroborate with the fact that inorganic fertilizer are becoming too expensive to purchase by small scale formers of cashew seedlings. Besides, these organic fertilizers appear to have a strong, lasting beneficial effect on the soil properties and could be environmentally friendly.
[1.] Aduayi, E.A., 1980. Effect of ammonium sulphate fertilization on soil chemical composition fruit yield and nutrient content of Okra. Ife Journal of Agriculture. 2(1): 16-33.
[2.] Adediran, J.A., O.J. Idowu and R.A. Sobulo, 1999. Effect of nitrogen sources on profile distribution of nitrate nitrogen in a haplistalf in Nigeria of soil science, 11:103-117.
[3.] Adeniyan, O.N. and S.O. Ojeniyi, 2005. Effect of poultry manure and NPK 15-15-15 and combination of their reduced level on maize growth and soil chemical composition. Nigerian Journal of soil science, 15: 34-41.
[4.] Agboola, A.A. and R.B. Corey, 1973. Soil testing NPK for maize in the soils derived from metamorphic and igneous rock of western state of Nigeria. Journal of west Africa science Association, 17(2): 93-100.
[5.] Aisueni, N.O., U. Omoti, F. Ekhator and Oviasogie, P. 2000. Effect of Compost on soils supporting nursery seedlings production of oil palm. Nig. Journal of Tree Crop Research, 4: 43-51.
[6.] Adepetu, J.A., 1986. Soil fertility and fertilizer requirements in Oyo, Ogun and Ondo States. FDAIR, Federal Ministry of Agric. Res. (Publ.) Lagos., 101-200.
[7.] AOAC, 1970. Official method of Analysis 12th edition AOAC, V.A Arlinton, O.O Folorunso, A.A. Agboola and G.O. Adeoye, 2000. Use of three fertilizer models to calculate P and K nutrient requirement of mazie (zea mays L): Journal of Technical Education., 2(1): 105-110.
[8.] International on fertilizer industry Association. 2004. World cashew production. Retrieved in February 2006 from http: 11 www. Fertili. Org/ifa/ publicat / F< a/ 2004- 01pt. as. Lefevre, A. 1970. Indication preliminaries sur lar fertilization de I anacardier fruits (French) 25(9): 621-628.
[9.] Mokwunye, E.A., 1974. Some reflections on the problems of available in soils of tropical Africa, Samaru conference paper 14.
[10.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2007. Effect of some organic fertilizer on soil and coffee (Coffee arabica) on leaf chemical composition and growth University of Khartoum. Journal of Agriculture science, 15(1): 52-70.
[11.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2008. Comparative evaluation of different organic fertilizers on the soil fertilities leaf mineral composition and growth of dikanut (Irvingia gabonensis). Emirate. Journal of food and Agriculture; 20(2): 1-9.
[12.] Moyin-jesu, E.I., 2009. Evaluation of sole and amended organic fertilizer on soil fertiliy and growth of kola seeding (Cola acuminata). Pertanika journal of tropical agricultural science: 32(1): 17-23.
[13.] Moyin-jesu, E.I. and F.O. Adekayode, 2010. Comparative Evaluation of Different organic Fertilizers on soil Fertility improvement, Leaf mineral Composition and growth performance of African Cherry Nut (Chrysophyllum albidium L.) Seedlings. Journal of American Science. 6(8).
[14.] Murphy, J. and J.P. Riley, 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in waters. Analytical chemistry Act a 9: 69-82.
[15.] Nagara, J.S., D.R. Shanmukappa, K. Velmourougane, P.P. Selvam and R.P.A. Alwar, 2000. Production of compost from coffee pulp. In (Ed): Recent Advances in Plantation crops Research, 121-124.
[16.] Obatolu, C.R. and A.A. Agboola, 1991. Use of organic material to improve the quality and quantity of soil organic matter in the humid tropics. In Proc. second African soil. Sc. Soc. Cario, Egypt. Elgala et. al., (Eds). 175-182.
[17.] Obatolu, C.R., 1995. Nutrient balance sheet after coffee and mazie cropping in an Alfisol supplied with organic fertilizer in Ibadan- Nigeria in, proc of 3rd African soil science conference., 21-22.
[18.] Obi, M.E. and C.O. Ofondiru, 1997. The effect of soil amendments on physical properties of a severely degraded sandy loam soil in south eastern Nigeria.
[19.] Odedina, S.A., S.O. Ojeniyi and M.A. Awodun, 2007. Effect of Agro-industrial wastes on nutrient status and performance of tomato, Global J. ENVIRON. RES, 1: 18-21.
[20.] Ohler, J.G., 1979. Cashew Koninklijk instituut voor de tropen Armsterdam, 260.
[21.] Ojeniyi, S.O. and K.B. Adejobi, 2002. Effect of ash and goat dung manure on leaf nutrient composition, growth and yield of Amaranthus, nig. Agric. J., 33: 46-57.
[22.] Opeke, L.K., 1982. Tropical tree crops. Spectrum Book Ltd. Pub. Woye and Sons (Nig.) pp: 360-366.
[23.] Owaiye, A.R. and O.A. Olunloye, 1990. The effects of NPK fertilizer combinations on incidence of inflorescence blight disease of cashew at Ochaja In: Annual Report of Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, pp: 31.
[24.] Soil Survey Staff, 1999. Soil taxonomy. A basic system for soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA. Handbook No 436. D.C. Washington
[25.] Walkley, A. and I.A. Black, 1934. An examination of degtajaroff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid filtration. Soil science: 37: 27-38.
[26.] Woomer, P.L. and F.N. Muchens, 1993. Overcoming soil constraint in crop production in tropical Africa. Seminar proceeding on sustaining soil productivity in intensive African Agriculture organized by C.TA Wageningen held in Ghananov, 10-17: 45.
[27.] Moyin-Jesu, E.I. and F.O. Adekayode, 2010. Comparative Evaluation of different organic fertilizer on soil fertility improvement, leaf, mineral composition and growth performance of African cherry nut (Chrysophyllum albidium) seeding. Journal of American science, 6(8).
(1) Adejobi, K.B., (2) Famaye, A.O., (3) Adeniyi, D.O., (4) Orisajo, S.B. and (5) Adeyemi, E.A.
(1-5) Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, P.M.B. 5244, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria.
Adejobi, K.B., Famaye, A.O., Adeniyi, D.O., Orisajo, S.B. and Adeyemi, E.A.: Effect of Cocoa Pod Husk Ash and Goat Dung on Nutrient Content and Growth Performance of Cashew (Anacardium Occidentale)
Adejobi, Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, P.M.B. 5244, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria.
Table 1: Pre--study Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of the Planting Soil. Soil Properties Value Physical Properties Sand 642.02g/kg Silt 136.56g/kg Clay 139.55g/kg Textural Class Sand loam Water Holding Capacity 36.70% Chemical Properties Soil pH (H20) 1:1 5.26 Organic Carbon 2.73g/kg Organic Matter 0.55% Total Nitrogen % 0.43g/kg Available Phosphorous 2.00mg/kg Exchangeable basis K+ 0.12mmol/kg Ca++ 0.10mmol/kg Na+ 0.13mmol/kg Mg++ 2.80mmol/kg Mn++ 0.03mmol/kg Exchangeable acidity Al+++ 0.23mmol/kg H+ 0.12mmol/kg ECEC 5.14mmol/kg Table 2: Chemical Analysis of Organic Fertilizer used for the Experiment. Treatment pH C/N N % P mg/kg K mg/L Na mg/L (H20) Ratio * GD 6.38 62.00 1.26 40.36 2.29 1.67 * CPHA 7.21 95.00 1.02 16.26 5.01 3.06 Treatment Mg mg/L Ca mg/kg * GD 1.90 3.40 * CPHA 1.80 3.60 Values are average of three replicates. * GD (Goat Dung). * CPHA (Cocoa Pod Husk Ash) Table 3: Effect of different levels of CPHA on growth parameters of cashew seedlings in the nursery. Treatment Plant Number Leaf Stem height of leaf area diameter (cm) (cm) 5t/ha CPHA 37.43b 26.46ab 73.76bc 0.81b 20t/ha GD 33.42b 21.66bc 81.96bc 0.89b 10t/ha GD + 40.98b 26.73ab 77.40bc 0.83b 5t/ha CPHA 15t/ha GD + 42.74b 26.46ab 82.65bc 1.09ab 5t/ha CPHA 20t/ha GD + 60.85a 30.6a 92.84a 1.85a 5t/ha CPHA 5t/ha GD + 40.98b 24.0bc 71.24bc 0.90ab 5 t/ha CPHA 400kg/ha Urea 45.34ab 21.93bc 84.69ab 1.00ab No treatment 33.42b 18.0c 64.59c 0.81b (control) Treatment Number of Root Shoot Branch length length (cm) (cm) 5t/ha CPHA 1.60bc 16.12c 18.60c 20t/ha GD 1.46bc 15.33c 17.34c 10t/ha GD + 1.93bc 16.33c 18.72c 5t/ha CPHA 15t/ha GD + 2.75ab 16.00c 18.21c 5t/ha CPHA 20t/ha GD + 3.53a 23.33a 25.66a 5t/ha CPHA 5t/ha GD + 2.60ab 16.66c 18.90c 5 t/ha CPHA 400kg/ha Urea 1.46bc 19.00b 21.02b No treatment 0.93c 12.33c 14.33c (control) Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other using Duncan Multiple Range Test at 5% level. Table 4: The yield parameter of cashew seedlings 24 weeks after planting under different level of cocoa pod husk ash and goat dung manure application. Treatment Fresh Dry Root Fresh Dry Shoot Root Weight Shoot Weight Weight (g) Weight (g) (g) (g) 5t/ha CPHA 24.66a 6.00b 43.00c 16.33g 20t/ha GD 23.33b 6.33c 46.00c 22.66c 10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 24.00b 6.00b 34.66c 15.00c 15t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 25.66a 8.33b 42.00c 17.66c 20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 27.00a 7.33a 68.66a 27.33a 5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 23.16b 5.00b 43.00c 16.33b 400kg/ha Urea 23.16b 5.00b 60.00b 25.66a No treatment (control) 23.33b 5.33b 39.66c 14.66d Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other using Duncan Multiple Range Text at 5% level. Table 5: The leaf chemical composition under different level of GD + CPHA. Treatment N % P mg/kg K mg/ 100g 5t/ha CPHA 4.4b 15.8b 7.3f 20t/ha GD 4.1bc 9.4d 13.3b 10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 4.0c 5.5a 9.7c 15 t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 2.4d 8.8a 6.8g 20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 5.1a 18.8a 8.3d 5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 3.9c 5.2g 14.5a 400kg/ha Urea 4.2bc 8.3e 7.5e No treatment (control) 2.2e 14.7c 6.1h Treatment Mg Ca mg/ Na mg/l mg/l 100g 5t/ha CPHA 4.3a 15.2b 3.8c 20t/ha GD 2.4d 12.0d 4.9a 10t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 2.4d 8.0g 3..8c 15 t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 2.4fd 9.4f 3.3d 20t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 2.5d 16.0a 3.9c 5t/ha GD + 5 t/ha CPHA 4.3d 11.2e 2.7e 400kg/ha Urea 3.8b 12.8c 3.9c No treatment (control) 3.8b 8.0g 4.7b Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other using Duncan Multiple Range Test at 5% level. Table 6: Soil Chemical Analysis after Experiment under different levels of GD and CPHA. Organic Organic Treatment Soil pH Carbon Matter (H20)1.1 (OC) g/kg (OM) % 5t/ha CPHA 5.89b 2.98a 2.96a 20t/ha GD 6.80a 2.99a 5.12a 10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 5.83b 2.41b 4.16a 15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 5.93ab 1.80d 3.10a 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 6.74a 2.34b 4.03a 5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 5.78b 1.99c 3.43a 400kg/ha Urea 5.50c 1.72d 2.97a Control 5.16c 1.67d 2.87a Treatment N % P mg/kg K mg/l 0.20a 4.71d 1.53b 5t/ha CPHA 0.48a 5.01c 0.70cd 20t/ha GD 0.41a 23.8a 1.75b 10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.24a 22.05b 2.27a 15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.40a 23.80a 0.98c 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.36a 1.93e 0.97c 5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.20a 4.83d 0.56de 400kg/ha Urea 0.12a 1.25f 0.45e Control Treatment Na mg/l Mg mg/l Ca mg/l 1.08b 2.60a 4.70b 5t/ha CPHA 0.78c 1.70c 4.00c 20t/ha GD 1.16b 1.30d 3.70cd 10t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 1.53a 2.30b 5.90a 15t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.86c 1.40d 3.20de 20t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.93bc 1.70c 3.30de 5t/ha GD + 5t/ha CPHA 0.60d 1.20d 2.90e 400kg/ha Urea 0.51d 1.30d 2.10f Control Treatment means within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other using Duncan Multiple Range Text at 5% level