EX-CIA AGENTS SAY CHEMICAL WEAPONS INCIDENTS WERE DOCUMENTED.

Byline: The New York Times

Two intelligence analysts who resigned earlier this year from the CIA say the agency possesses dozens of classified documents showing that tens of thousands of Americans may have been exposed to Iraqi chemical weapons during the Persian Gulf War in 1991.

The husband-and-wife intelligence analysts, Patrick and Robin Eddington, say that while investigating the issue at the CIA, they turned up evidence of as many as 60 incidents in which nerve gas and other chemical weapons were released in the vicinity of American troops.

The Eddingtons assert that the CIA and the Pentagon repeatedly tried to hinder their unauthorized investigation. And they say that when they insisted on pursuing the inquiry over the protests of senior officials, their promising careers were effectively destroyed. Their inquiry attracted concern at the highest levels of the agencies, including John M. Deutch, a former Pentagon official who is now the director of central intelligence.

``The evidence of chemical exposures among our troops is overwhelming, but the government won't deal with it,'' said Eddington, who resigned this month after more than eight years at the agency, most of it spent as an analyst of satellite and aerial photographs from the Persian Gulf.

The CIA and the Defense Department have rejected the Eddingtons' accusations. Yet despite the public appearance of unanimity among government officials - namely, that there was no evidence until recently that large numbers of American troops were exposed to the Iraqi poisons in the war - the Eddingtons' account suggests that there was evidence earlier of many possible exposures, and that there was a heated internal debate within the government over the meaning of the intelligence reports.

Patrick Eddington, who is 33 and is preparing to publish a book outlining his allegations against the CIA, said government officials who had overseen investigations of Gulf War illnesses ``have lied, are continuing to lie, are continuing to withhold information.''

He became so enraged over the government's conduct that in 1994, he wrote a letter to the editor of the The Washington Times, without noting his ties to the intelligence agency. The letter, which was published, alleged a government ``cover-up.''

Scientists have been unable to find an explanation for the variety of ailments reported by Gulf War veterans. But increasingly, the medical debate has become separate from the issue of whether the government has told the truth about the intelligence reports about chemical weapons that it received during and after the war.

Robin Eddington, who is 32 and now works for a military contractor, said she had seen at least one classified document suggesting that even trace exposure to chemical weapons over an extended period could cause illness, an assertion at odds with the Pentagon's official position.

The Eddingtons said they were unable to provide details of the documents that they have seen because they are still classified.