Printer Friendly


 WASHINGTON, Dec. 9 /PRNewswire/ -- The European Commission in Brussels yesterday unveiled its long-awaited White Paper which is designed to map out a strategy for boosting the European Union's (EU) economic growth, restore its competitiveness and aim to create 15 million new jobs in the '90s, the EC Delegation announced.
 In order to achieve its employment targets, the EU will need an annual economic growth rate of three percent up to the year 2000. In addition to the policies outlined above, this will require an increase in the rate of investment from 19 percent of GNP to 23-24 percent.
 The 200-page document, which is the result of exhaustive consultations between the executive commission and government, business, labor and other authorities throughout the EU over the past year, will form the agenda for a special meeting tomorrow in Brussels of the European Council, which brings together the heads of government of the 12 member states, along with Commission President Jacques Delors.
 The White Paper, which is designed as a discussion document but which outlines not just policy options but some concrete proposals, will serve as a valuable starting point not only for the internal EU debate on how to tackle the number one issue of unemployment but also for the forthcoming jobs conference of G7 countries due to be held in the United States in February.
 The White Paper, a term derived from the British parliamentary system to denote a government discussion document, is subtitled "Tackling the Challenges and Moving into the 21st Century." It emphasizes that there is no miracle solution to the challenge facing the EU of creating 15 million new jobs by the end of the century in order to reduce unemployment to manageable levels. It also emphasizes the need for flexible solutions tailored to individual member states or regions.
 The White Paper provides a detailed analysis of why the EU is suffering from low economic growth, why it has been losing competitiveness, not only to emerging economies and developing countries but also to the United States and Japan, and why it has not been able to create sufficient jobs from what growth it has achieved.
 It points in particular to a shrinking of the EU's economic growth potential from around 4 percent to 2.5 percent a year over the past two decades. Particularly striking is the decline in the investment ratio by 5 percentage points. The paper points to the speed of technological change and demographic factors within the EU (primarily the aging of the population) as additional factors.
 Nevertheless, the commission believes that the EU has the potential to reverse its decline. It cites assets such as its financial capital and highly efficient banking institutions, its non-physical capital (high level of education, tradition of innovation) and the soundness of its social model as positive factors. It also points to the fact that over the 1986-90 period, when the Single Market was being created, the EU registered an economic growth increase of half a percentage point each year, increased investment by one-third and created 9 million new jobs.
 Yet it poses the key questions: "How can we explain the fact that all these achievements have not made it possible at least to cushion the effects of the world recession? Was the creation of the single market merely a flash in the pan?" The conclusion is that, while the EU has adapted, most of the rest of the world has adapted even faster.
 In its quest for policies to overcome this deficiency, the commission rules out:
 -- protectionism, which would be suicidal for the EU as the world's
 largest trading power. A successful conclusion of the current
 GATT negotiations is regarded as an essential growth factor.
 -- a dash for growth, which would result in even higher budgetary
 -- widespread cuts in wages and in social welfare protection, which
 could depress domestic demand
 -- generalized reductions in working-hours or widespread job-sharing
 Instead, it provides broad guidelines under three headings:
 -- a gradual restoration of economic growth
 -- a return to competitiveness
 -- the creation of employment
 On economic growth, the White Paper envisages two phases. The first is a gradual reduction of public deficits which would, once indebtedness is under control, allow for an increase in public spending in the second phase. It advocates the allocation of public resources primarily to investments aimed at an active employment policy.
 A second objective is stable monetary policies leading to low inflation which would in turn result in lower interest rates and higher investment. The document particularly favors investment in infrastructure, housing and environmental improvement projects.
 A third recommendation is wage moderation to guard against inflation and to restore competitiveness. Real wage increases of one percent less than the increase in productivity are suggested as a rule of thumb.
 In order to restore competitiveness, the White Paper highlights three main recommendations:
 -- ensuring the smooth functioning of the single market which was
 achieved in 1992
 -- greater promotion of small and medium-sized businesses
 -- a massive investment in trans-European infrastructure networks
 requiring a total investment of 20 billion ECU a year in the
 1994-99 period (1 ECU equals $1.13) of this amount:
 -- about 5.3 billion ECU is already being provided out of the EU
 -- about 6.7 billion ECU is being spent by the European
 Investment Bank
 -- the remainder could be financed by the issuing of "Union
 Bonds" by the commission, using its triple A credit rating to
 borrow. The EIB could also give credit guarantees on behalf
 of companies involved in the infrastructure projects who wish
 to raise capital.
 Considerable emphasis is also placed on the importance of increased investment in R&D, particularly in new information technologies and in biotechnology. Eco-technologies are also seen as a major growth area.
 On employment, the White Paper also aims to promote greater social solidarity between job-holders and job-seekers, between men and women and between generations, as well as between prosperous and struggling regions throughout the EU. It speaks of the need to create a social pact.
 It places a lot of emphasis on continuing and better education and training, greater flexibility in the labor market and a reduction in the non-wage costs of employment, especially in the low-skilled and lower paid categories where unemployment is highest. Greater labor mobility, which is an important factor in keeping down unemployment in the United States, is also advocated. Special schemes to create youth employment are highlighted.
 On specifics, the commission points out that a reduction of 30-40 percent in social security contributions for low-paid workers would increase employment by 2 percent. It proposes a reduction of non- wage costs for unskilled or semi-skilled by an amount equivalent to 1 or 2 points of GNP by the end of the decade.
 One-third of the cost would be covered by an improvement in taxation resulting from the additional jobs created. The remainder could be covered by, among other things, a CO2 energy tax which the commission has already proposed.
 Another suggestion is to reverse the current ratio of government expenditure related to unemployment, two thirds of which is at present spent on providing an income for those without jobs and only one third devoted to employment creation. An additional source of temporary employment and work experience is the public sector. The White Paper contends that such a policy need not be prohibitively expensive. It estimates that it would be largely offset by the savings that would be made by reducing the number of unemployed by 1 million after three years.
 The White Paper, which the commission emphasizes is a set of broad guidelines rather than a prescriptive policy document, will be discussed for the first time tomorrow by the 12 heads of government meeting within the European Council. The role of the council is to provide political pointers for future detailed policy action.
 A commission spokesman said today: "The ability of the EU to emerge from its current difficulties should be of profound interest and concern to the United States. The recession in the EU has resulted in a significant fall in demand which has seen the U.S. trade surplus with the EU fall from $24 billion in 1991 to almost zero this year. It is in both our interests to enable the EU to begin contributing again to international growth. We look forward to next February jobs summit in the U.S. to help chart a course for the industrial countries for the remainder of this century and beyond."
 -0- 12/9/93
 /NOTE TO EDITORS: Copies of the White Paper are available on request./
 /CONTACT: Peter Doyle, 202-862-9530, Ella Krucoff,

202-862-9540, or Maeve O'Beirne, 202-862-9549, all of the EC Delegation/

CO: EC Delegation ST: District of Columbia IN: SU:

DC-DT -- DC037 -- 2417 12/09/93 18:05 EST
COPYRIGHT 1993 PR Newswire Association LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:PR Newswire
Date:Dec 9, 1993
Previous Article:/NYSE CLOSING, THURSDAY, DEC. 9 /PRN/

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters