Printer Friendly

EPA Proposes Water Quality Standards for a Segment of Five Mile Creek in Alabama.

Business Editors/Environment Writers


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced today that it has proposed water quality standards that establish a designated use of Fish & Wildlife for the segment of Five Mile Creek from Newfound Creek to Ketona in the State of Alabama.

EPA is proposing this new designated use to ensure protection for aquatic life and recreation in and on the water. This upgrade will require Alabama to protect this segment for fish and wildlife. Facilities discharging into Five Mile Creek may need to upgrade their pollution control measures to achieve the Fish & Wildlife designated use, but they have discretion in the measures they use.

Upgrading the designated use of this segment of Five Mile Creek produces important environmental and public health benefits that protects so that fish and wildlife can thrive. Also, the Fish & Wildlife designation will make possible safe outdoor swimming and other whole body water-contact sports during the summer.

This action was taken, due to a consent decree EPA signed with the Alabama Rivers Alliance and Legal Environmental Assistance Foundation requiring EPA to propose a federal use designation for this stream segment (among others) or withdraw its disapproval by October 15, 2002. This action, along with EPA's approval of the state's revisions to the remaining streams' designated uses, fulfills that commitment. If Alabama revises its water quality standards and upgrades the use designation of this stream segment from Agricultural & Industrial Water Supply to Fish & Wildlife, the Agency will not publish a final federal use designation. If Alabama makes the necessary changes after EPA promulgates this rule, EPA will withdraw the federal use designation.

EPA's water quality standards regulations require states to designate uses for all water bodies within their jurisdiction. Designated uses determine what water quality criteria apply to specific water bodies. EPA's regulations interpret the Clean Water Act's goal of "... water quality which provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water ..." by requiring that water quality standards provide for "fishable/swimmable" uses unless they have been shown to be unattainable. When the Agency disapproves a state or tribal water quality standard, and the state or tribe does not make appropriate changes, EPA's Administrator must propose and promulgate revised standards.

The public is invited to comment on the proposed water quality standards when it is published in the Federal Register Wednesday, October 23, 2002. The comment period will extend for 60 days from the date of publication. The comments will be reviewed by EPA's Region 4 (Atlanta) and a final Federal Register notice addressing all comments and announcing a final decision will then be issued.

The material can be viewed in the official public docket from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at EPA Region 4, Water Management Division, Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, 30303-3104. Ask for Proposed Water Quality Standards for Alabama OW-2002-0023.

The document also can be found on the EPA web site at or use EPA's E-DOCKETS at to submit or view public comments. Refer to the Federal Register notice for instructions on submitting comments.

EPA will hold a public hearing on this proposal on December 12th from 2 to 5 p.m. and from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Sheraton Birmingham, 2101 Richard Arrington Jr. Boulevard North, Birmingham, Alabama.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Oct 23, 2002
Previous Article:Sypris Reports 33% Gain in Third Quarter Earnings Per Share; Bookings Up 36% to $200 Million Through Nine Months.
Next Article:American Medical Systems Net Income up 76 Percent On 14 Percent Sales Growth.

Related Articles
EPA's priorities for '92.
EPA's approach to endangered species protection in state clean water act programs.
Addressing water pollution from livestock grazing after O.N.D.A. v. Dombeck: legal strategies under the Clean Water Act.
Municipal separate storm sewer systems: Is compliance with state water quality standards only a pipe dream?
EPA: funding and pollution problems persist. (Water Quality).
Roads not taken: EPA vs. Clean Water.
Salmon and water temperature: taking endangered species seriously in establishing water quality standards.
Debate heats up over water temperature rules for dams.
Bureaucratic Boundaries vs. Clean Water: a Reply to Clifford J. Villa, by Michael C. Blumm * & William Warnock **.
Mine may make Superfund list.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters