Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,480,151 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL SUPPORTING THE TROOPS ONCE THE FIGHTING BEGINS, AMERICANS ARE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE.


FOR most of us, the debate surrounding the possibility of war in Iraq is an abstraction, an intellectual weighing of the pros and cons.

For the men and women in uniform overseas - and for their families and friends - it's personal.

And if and when war starts, it will become personal for all of us.

In today's Daily News, we look at the stories of nine local-area men who have shipped out to the Middle East, men who are prepared to fight for their nation at a moment's notice.

These proud Americans are among the scores of our neighbors, co-workers and friends who will be in our thoughts, hearts and prayers through every second of the conflict, from the first shot fired to the last.

It's often remarked that the debate about a war means nothing to the soldier in the trenches. Under fire and with their lives at risk, our troops don't have the luxury of discussing foreign policy. Their only concern is their lives, the men and women around them and their duty.

It's the same with the loved ones they leave behind. Among family members of local residents stationed in the Middle East, there's a wide range of attitudes about President George W. Bush's policies, from unwavering support to serious doubt.

Yet on one point the relatives and friends agree: Should war break out, may it be quick, decisive and take as few lives as possible.

We all can agree on that.

The debate over the war is healthy and constructive, but once war begins, it becomes irrelevant. At that point, no matter what our individual positions once were, we're all on the same side. We're no longer hawks or doves, Democrats or Republicans.

We're all Americans.

That's how we all felt on Sept. 11, 2001, when our fellow Americans were also under fire, only not in desert foxholes, but in their places of work and on commercial airliners.

War has a way of focusing our attention and drawing us to what matters most, which, in the case of Iraq, means supporting our troops, seeing them to victory and welcoming them home soon.

COPYRIGHT 2003 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Mar 16, 2003
Words:355
Previous Article:OUTRAGEOUS MOMENTS.(U)
Next Article:EMOTIONAL MOMENTS.(U)



Related Articles
How they missed that story; the first casualty of Desert Shield was a skeptical press. (Operation Desert Shield)
You can't keep a good theory down; the just war, the Gulf War & beyond.
Journal fever. (conservative stance of Wall Street Journal editorial page)
Editorials need more bite.
Newspapers are increasingly out of step with readers.
WHY WAS ELIAN LESS WORTHY THAN GISELLE? CASTRO CAVED IN OVER JUST ONE LITTLE GIRL.(Viewpoint)
Making the case for the editorial voice. (President's Letter).(Editorial)
Idaho conference focuses on wartime comment.
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles