Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,467,449 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL SQUISHY FIGURES THE LAPD NEEDS TO OFFER AN HONEST ACCOUNTING OF ITS PROPOSED TAX INCREASE.


WHEN Los Angeles police officials first started pushing the half-percent sales-tax measure earlier this year, they declared that the $160 million a year it would bring in would pay for hiring 1,800 more cops.

But now that it's just two months until voters decide whether to endorse the sales tax, the word is that, really, the Los Angeles Police Department will only be able to hire 1,260 officers.

So what gives?

It's no mystery how much it costs to hire one new cop, so why the shifting numbers?

When it comes to spending the public's money, it never seems to be clear up front how much things will cost, or how much value government can get. When it comes to expenditures, such as the proposed new Parker Center, the price starts as something reasonable and keeps climbing.

If officials want to get the public behind a project - and keep it there - they must have hard numbers, not the squishy figures that only serve to fuel mistrust.

COPYRIGHT 2004 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Sep 2, 2004
Words:168
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM ONE DEATH TOO MUCH.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
Next Article:EDITORIAL A LONG WAY TO GO SMALL TEST-SCORE GAINS INCH LAUSD CLOSER, BUT HURDLES REMAIN.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
COUNCIL MOVES TO PUT LAPD TAX ON BALLOT.(News)
Follow the money: the business side; You can make a bigger difference in education reform by delving into financial incentives for success -- and...
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles