Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,480,151 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL SACRAMENTO SERENDIPITY FORTUNE FAVORS THE WELL-CONNECTED.


WITH only days left in the current legislative session, California Senate President Don Perata, D-Oakland, derailed a bill tightening regulations on developers -- legislation that builders bitterly opposed. Two days later, the building industry cut a $500,000 check to one of his political committees.

Coincidence?

Maybe, but Sacramento seems to be awash in coincidences these days.

Perata's counterpart in the state Assembly, Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles, knows a thing or two about coincidences. His wife has been given a $125,000 consulting contract from the South Coast Air Quality Management District -- at the same time the SCAQMD SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCAQMD - Southern California Air Quality Management District
 was seeking legislation it favored in Sacramento.

Another coincidence, to be sure. One that just so happens to benefit one of the state's most powerful politicians.

Right?

Sure, just like the rather fortunate coincidences that have befallen some of Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's most generous contributors. According to an analysis from the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, 13 Schwarzenegger supporters who have either directly or indirectly contributed heavily to the governor's campaigns have received highly prized state appointments.

The Schwarzenegger administration insists that there's no connection between the two, just as Perata denies any link between his fundraising and his decision-making. And Nunez says he will in no way promote the bill backed by the group that's paying his wife.

They could well be telling the truth. Perhaps the politicians earnestly believe that their positions of power have nothing to do with the good fortunes of their friends, loved ones and supporters. But it's hard to believe that the special interests who fund the politicians aren't seeking some kind of a return on their investment, even if no quid pro quo
Quid Pro Quo
A Latin phrase that translates to "something for something." This term is used in financial circles generally to describe the mutual agreement between two parties in which each party provides a good or service in return for a good or service.

Notes:
Quid pro quo agreements are sometimes viewed negatively. Here are a couple examples of negative quid pro quo activities:

1.
 is ever actually discussed.

And while the politicians might be in denial about what's going on all around them, the public is under no such delusions. Disgusted voters see the control that special interests exert over what goes on in Sacramento, then stay home on Election Day.

And that's no coincidence.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Aug 29, 2006
Words:331
Previous Article:A BITTER TASTE FOR WEAVER ANGELS ROOKIE SUFFERS FIRST LOSS BOSTON 2, ANGELS 1.(Sports)
Next Article:EDITORIAL HANDHELD HAZARD PHONING AND DRIVING A BAD MIX.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
Editorial cartooning for dummies: creating a good cartoon is about idea and execution, inspiration, and mechanics.(Symposium: cartoonists on the...
Which editorial will be your big red tomato?(Editorial Workshop)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Wikis will help readers direct the community's most powerful voice: opinion writers from younger generation offer fresh perspective.(SYMPOSIUM: The...
Come to Sacramento in 2008 or Arnold will rip your spine out.(2008 CONVENTION BID)(Arnold Schwarzenegger)
Basic statement of principles.(editorial writing methods)
We don't need it.(Crowned with the Imperial We)(Brief article)
New NCEW members: July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2005.(National Conference of Editorial Writers)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Too much of a good thing?(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles