Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,672,921 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL REAL DELAY FEDS, STATES, DEMS AND GOP POINT FINGERS OVER ID PLAN.


MORE than five years have passed since the attacks on 9-11 demonstrated, in horrific detail, the need to establish proper identification for everyone living in the U.S.

But throughout that time, government at all levels and politicians of both parties have been far more interested in shifting blame than in taking responsibility.

It wasn't until last year that Congress passed the ``Real ID'' law, more by hook and by crook than through any coherent process. The legislation was slapped onto an emergency measure granting funding to tsunami victims.

And the law -- which sets stringent standards for the issuance of state driver's licenses -- has its problems. First among them is that details of the measure have been left up to the Department of Homeland Security Noun 1. Department of Homeland Security - the federal department that administers all matters relating to homeland security
Homeland Security

executive department - a federal department in the executive branch of the government of the United States
 to figure out, which, so far, it hasn't.

Then there's the price tag.

Real ID will cost states $11 billion over the next five years -- $500 million in California alone -- but Congress has offered only $40 million to help them gain compliance.

It's no surprise that, facing such a huge, mostly unfunded mandate An unfunded mandate is a statute that requires government or private parties to carry out specific actions, but does not appropriate any funds for that purpose. Examples
, many states, including California, are bristling bristling

see hackles.
. They hope that the new Democratic congressional majority will roll back Real ID altogether, as two senators have proposed.

That would be an understandable response, but problematic in its own right.

For starters, Democrats campaigned on a promise to enact the reforms proposed by the 9-11 commission, and those reforms included the sorts of measures included in Real ID.

More important, though, is that simply rolling back Real ID would do nothing to address the problem it was intended to fix -- namely, ensuring that all identification cards are secure.

As it stands, anyone with a driver's license from any state can board a plane, rent a truck or buy a gun in this country. Yet there are few meaningful safeguards in most states to make sure that those applying for licenses are who they say they are -- a security loophole A vulnerability in software, typically in the operating system, that enables an attacker to compromise the system. See vulnerability.  that can make life all too easy for terrorists. And there are problems with forgery and tampering tampering The adulteration of a thing. See Drug tampering. .

Compounding the problem are the country's busted bust·ed  
adj.
1. Slang
a. Smashed or broken: busted glass; a busted rib.

b. Out of order; inoperable: a busted vending machine.

2.
 immigration immigration, entrance of a person (an alien) into a new country for the purpose of establishing permanent residence. Motives for immigration, like those for migration generally, are often economic, although religious or political factors may be very important.  system and the millions of people who cross our borders and operate here anonymously. In an age of terrorism, we desperately need some system for identifying everyone on American soil.

Yet efforts to extend identification to illegal immigrants in California -- in the form of driver's licenses -- have been frustrated frus·trate  
tr.v. frus·trat·ed, frus·trat·ing, frus·trates
1.
a. To prevent from accomplishing a purpose or fulfilling a desire; thwart:
. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger (German pronunciation (IPA): [ˈaɐ̯nɔlt ˈaloɪ̯s ˈʃvaɐ̯ʦənˌʔɛɡɐ]  says he's open to the idea, but he's waiting on the Department of Homeland Security to first issue its specifics for implementing Real ID, which may end up getting repealed, anyway.

Thus we have Washington pointing the finger at the states, and the states pointing it right back, while Democrats and Republicans complain about one another.

While everyone agrees that someone should do something, no one seems willing to do it -- and the country remains at risk.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jan 24, 2007
Words:478
Previous Article:REDISTRICTING GOAL NEEDS COMPROMISE.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:EDITORIAL GOING GREEN A HYBRID FOR EVERY POL.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Topics:



Related Articles
How to run a Texas-sized regional.(National Conference of Editorial Writers suggestions on hosting legislative briefings for editorial writers)
PUBLIC FORUM BUSWAY WORK.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
At Idaho, editorials reign supreme.
Editorials that matter: statewide editorial thrashing, led by NCEW members, gets results at New York legislature.(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Abhorring a vacuum: the demise of Hastert's majority.(Dennis Hastert)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles