Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,930 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL QUESTIONS FOR BRATTON NEW CHIEF NEEDS TO SHARE HIS VISION IN PUBLIC AND ON THE RECORD.


OF all the decisions Los Angeles City Council The Los Angeles City Council is the governing body of the City of Los Angeles, California, United States.  members make, the most important - at least to the residents of the city - may be the selection of a police chief.

The council's record in this regard, as in most others, is poor. The past three chiefs - Daryl F. Gates, Willie L. Williams Willie L. Williams (born 1 October, 1943) was chief of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) from 1992 to 1997, taking over after chief Daryl Gates' resignation following the 1992 Los Angeles riots.  and Bernard C. Parks Bernard Parks (born December 7, 1943 in Beaumont, Texas) is a member of the Los Angeles City Council, representing the 8th District in South Los Angeles and former Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department.

Parks attended Los Angeles City College, received his B.S.
 - ended their terms embroiled em·broil  
tr.v. em·broiled, em·broil·ing, em·broils
1. To involve in argument, contention, or hostile actions: "Avoid . . .
 in controversies and left a Police Department in disarray.

On Friday, the council has the opportunity to do its due diligence Research; analysis; your homework. This term has caught on in all industries, because it sounds so "wired." Who would want to do analysis or research when they can do due diligence. See wired.  in questioning Mayor James Hahn's choice for the next chief of police, William Bratton, a former head of police in New York City New York City: see New York, city.
New York City

City (pop., 2000: 8,008,278), southeastern New York, at the mouth of the Hudson River. The largest city in the U.S.
 and Boston.

Nothing less than a full airing of all the issues, pinning Bratton down on specifics, will do.

This is particularly important for the five council members who serve districts wholly within the San Fernando Valley San Fernando Valley

Valley, southern California, U.S. Northwest of central Los Angeles, the valley is bounded by the San Gabriel, Santa Susana, and Santa Monica mountains and the Simi Hills.
 and the two whose districts cover parts of the Valley.

In the debate over Valley secession, the question of crime and the quality of police service has consistently emerged as the most important for candidates and residents alike.

And for good reason: No community is so underserved by the Los Angeles Police Department "LAPD" and "L.A.P.D." redirect here. For other uses, see LAPD (disambiguation).

This article or section is written like an .
 as the Valley. In fiscal year 2001, Los Angeles spent a mere $170 per capita [Latin, By the heads or polls.] A term used in the Descent and Distribution of the estate of one who dies without a will. It means to share and share alike according to the number of individuals.  on policing in the Valley, compared with $288 per person in the south side, $232 in the central area and $225 for the Westside.

Geographically, that amounts to about $1 million per square mile in the Valley - as opposed to $3.5 million per square mile in the city's southern section, $3.6 million in the central city, and $1.7 million on the Westside.

These questions need answering: What will Bratton do to fix the deployment system used by the LAPD 1. LAPD - Link Access Procedure on the D channel.
2. LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department.
 that shortchanges the Valley?

What will he do about gangs that are the scourge of our neighborhoods?

What will he do to shorten the Valley's police response times, which are outrageously higher than anywhere else in the city?

What will he do to reduce the widespread fear of crime among Valley residents, even during those recent, happy days of falling crime?

What will he do about officer morale, discipline, the code of silence and all the other problems facing the LAPD?

There are dozens of other questions that Bratton needs to answer in public and on the record, not the least of which is: How can we be sure that the department is not going to become an arm of the mayor and the downtown power structure?

We would have liked to have asked Bratton these questions ourselves - and reported the answers - but the mayor barred him from coming to the Daily News for an editorial board meeting or even giving a Daily News reporter a face-to-face, sit-down interview.

That's a shame. It cheats Valley residents out of getting useful information.

For, on his record, there is much to admire in William Bratton, and good reason to hope he can restore the luster to the tarnished LAPD badge, carry out long-needed reforms and restore law and order to our streets and neighborhoods.

The council has a responsibility to the 3.6 million people of Los Angeles to make sure that Bratton is the right man for the job and to make sure that the public knows where he stands on all the issues, so that he can be held accountable for his performance.

The time to ask the questions - and judge the answers - is now.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Oct 10, 2002
Words:575
Previous Article:EDITORIAL EIDC GALL.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:ADJUSTED CENSUS COUNT MUST BE RELEASED.(News)(Statistical Data Included)



Related Articles
In search of good ideas to serve our readers: the Innovations Committee is creating a forum for sharing ideas on improving our pages.
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
"Broken windows": Frumkin responds.(Perspectives/ Correspondence)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles