Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,541,295 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL PORT SHUTDOWN BUSH HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO INVOKE TAFT-HARTLEY ACT.


THE shutdown of West Coast seaports over a dispute between the longshoremen's union and shippers represents one of the most pointless and destructive labor actions in years.

President George W. Bush initiated a legally required study of the shutdown's economic impact Monday with the clear intention of invoking the Taft-Hartley Act
Taft-Hartley Act
A Federal law that was enacted in 1947 that prohibited certain union practices and required improvement in union disclosure of financial and political dealings.

Notes:
Basically, the Taft-Hartley act is an outline of the Federal government's requirements for unions. It protects union members against possible unfavorable dealings enacted by the controlling members.
 to force the dock workers to go back to work unloading the roughly 200 cargo-laden ships stuck offshore. He has no alternative considering the enormous economic damage that's being done.

This is not a dispute about wages, since the dock workers make as much as $135,000 a year, but about labor resistance to progress.

This is not a dispute about anyone losing their jobs, since the dock workers are guaranteed job security.

What it is quite simply is a work slowdown initiated in support of contract demands to prevent modern technology from being used to make cargo handling more efficient. In response, shipping companies locked the workers out since productivity had reached such a low point.

We aren't talking here about minimum-wage workers without benefits. We're talking about the nation's highest-paid blue-collar workers with lucrative pension and benefit plans fighting against progress itself.

And the cost to America's struggling economy is about $2 billion a day. Produce is rotting, goods aren't being delivered, layoffs soon will ripple out to numerous other industries.

Bush has no rational choice except to move swiftly to force the dock workers back on the job and to make sure they do a full day's work while pressure is brought to bear to find an equitable solution to the contract issues.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Oct 8, 2002
Words:267
Previous Article:WHO'D HAVE THOUGHT IT'D BE THIS MATCHUP?(Sports)
Next Article:LAUSD CHIEF SAYS WE NEED 13 GRADES - THAT'S A SOLUTION?(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
Importers want federal action in port labor fight. (Up Front).(Brief Article)
TOLL RISES IN LOCKOUT AT DOCKS BUSH, HAHN FEAR HUGE LOSSES.(Business)(Statistical Data Included)
PORT LOCKOUT COSTS VALLEY.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
GROWERS GRATEFUL, WARY IF STANDOFF RETURNS, LOSSES COULD TOP $8 MILLION.(Business)
Companies look to skies to avoid port uncertainty. (Up Front).(Brief Article)
Just-in-time inventory system proves vulnerable to labor strife. (Up Front).(Brief Article)
Ripple effects from the docks. (LABJ Forum).(West Coast port closure)
Can the powerful ports union be weakened?(International Longshore and Warehouse Union)(Brief Article)
L.A. port enters labor agreement for Maersk terminal. (Up Front).(pre-employment contract has been signed with building trades unions)
Labor resolution paves way for big changes at ports. (Deal of the Year - Dockworkers Pact).

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles