EDITORIAL NO ON PROPOSITION 85 VOTERS ALREADY REJECTED THIS -- LAST YEAR.ONE year ago, voters rejected Proposition 73. That measure would have required that the parents of minor girls seeking abortions be notified 48 hours beforehand. This year, the proposition is back in its same form for the Nov. 7 election. The Daily News supported the proposition last year for the simple reason that parents under most circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact. 2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or have a right to know what sort of medical procedures their children are undergoing. We believed then, as now, that this bill would in no way undermine undermine, v to separate surgically the skin or mucosa from its underlying stroma so that it can be stretched or moved to cover a defect or wound. the guarantees of Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade, case decided in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Along with Doe v. Bolton, this decision legalized abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. . But this time we cannot endorse To sign a paper or document, thereby making it possible for the rights represented therein to pass to another individual. Also spelled indorse. endorse (indorse) v. the parental-notification act. While we still believe in the idea, we believe in the voice of the voters even more. The voters made a statement by rejecting this just one year ago. The proponents are dismissing them and the public sentiment Sentiment can refer to:
Either way, the voters have spoken. And we listened. Abusing the initiative process should not be supported. Vote no on Proposition 85. CAPTION(S): box Box: Daily News Endorsements To Date |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion