Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,922 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL NEEDLESS SQUABBLING.


IT'S hard to understand why, exactly, Republicans and Democrats in Washington fought so fiercely and angrily over anti-gang legislation the House of Representatives passed Wednesday. Couldn't this be a rare situation where both sides are right?

Republicans argued that modern gangs are the 21st century equivalent of Al Capone's Mafia, if not worse, because they terrorize ter·ror·ize  
tr.v. ter·ror·ized, ter·ror·iz·ing, ter·ror·iz·es
1. To fill or overpower with terror; terrify.

2. To coerce by intimidation or fear. See Synonyms at frighten.
 entire communities. It's hard to argue with that, or with Republicans' contention that gangsters ought to be treated like gangsters - subject to federal anti- racketeering Traditionally, obtaining or extorting money illegally or carrying on illegal business activities, usually by Organized Crime . A pattern of illegal activity carried out as part of an enterprise that is owned or controlled by those who are engaged in the illegal activity.  laws and tough, mandatory penalties for serious offenses.

That said, Democrats are also right to note that law enforcement is by no means the single bullet that will eradicate Eradicate
To completely do away with something, eliminate it, end its existence.

Mentioned in: Smallpox
 gang violence. We can lock up gangbangers in jail, but they are likely to be replaced by younger generations until society can comprehensively address the social problems that lead so many young people to lives of crime.

And there are many such problems.

There's the breakdown of families, poverty, failing schools and a lack of opportunity and constructive activities for kids. There's a popular culture that glamorizes the thug lifestyle, and there's a lack of a strong social and cultural network to look out for kids in trouble and intervene where necessary.

So why - other than ideological stubbornness and sheer partisanship par·ti·san 1  
n.
1. A fervent, sometimes militant supporter or proponent of a party, cause, faction, person, or idea.

2.
 - should Democrats and Republicans be at odds on this issue? Both sides' approach is needed in a full-fledged war on gangs. We need to reach out to those at risk and come down hard on those actively terrorizing their communities.

As Los Angeles Police Department "LAPD" and "L.A.P.D." redirect here. For other uses, see LAPD (disambiguation).

This article or section is written like an .
 Lt. Paul Vernon put it, ``Anything that puts more teeth in helping to interdict interdict (ĭn`tərdĭkt), ecclesiastical censure notably used in the Roman Catholic Church, especially in the Middle Ages. When a parish, state, or nation is placed under the interdict no public church ceremony may take place, only certain  gang crime is good.'' By that standard, this new legislation is a positive step.

Rather than fighting a good but incomplete effort, Democrats would be better served pushing for legislation that better addresses the social causes underpinning un·der·pin·ning  
n.
1. Material or masonry used to support a structure, such as a wall.

2. A support or foundation. Often used in the plural.

3. Informal The human legs. Often used in the plural.
 gang violence. And Republicans would do well to join them in that effort.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:May 13, 2005
Words:320
Previous Article:BRITISH PUB FARE AT PRICES THAT ARE MORE THAN FAIR.(U)
Next Article:LISTENERS SHOW TROOPS HOW MUCH THEY CARE.(U)



Related Articles
Field editorials worth the trouble.
Don't just sign editorials; do pro/cons, too.(The Masthead Symposium: Signed Editorials)
Two Days in the U.N.'s Glass Building.(Brief Article)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Wrangling legislatures.(Legislative conferences)
Deep thought, hurricanes don't mix: a Louisiana editorialist deals with the chaos of Katrina.(SYMPOSIUM: Editorializing in the face of disaster)
We don't need it.(Crowned with the Imperial We)(Brief article)
Weigh in on women on the op-ed.(MEMBER NEWS: Remembrances, milestones, awards)(online discussion group)(Brief article)
Standing apart from the crowd: how the 2006 Minority Writers Seminar helped an opinionated person fine-tune her writing style.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles