EDITORIAL NATIONAL DISGRACE GOVERNMENT'S KATRINA RESPONSE WAS TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE.SINCE the moment the levees in New Orleans New Orleans (ôr`lēənz –lənz, ôrlēnz`), city (2006 pop. 187,525), coextensive with Orleans parish, SE La., between the Mississippi River and Lake Pontchartrain, 107 mi (172 km) by water from the river mouth; founded were breached by the fury of Hurricane Katrina Who knows how many of the 1,400 dead during the disaster lost their lives because of the slow response by the Bush administration and its officials at the Department of Homeland Security Noun 1. Department of Homeland Security - the federal department that administers all matters relating to homeland security Homeland Security executive department - a federal department in the executive branch of the government of the United States , which controls the Federal Emergency Management Agency The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is the federal agency responsible for coordinating emergency planning, preparedness, risk reduction, response, and recovery. The agency works closely with state and local governments by funding emergency programs and providing technical ? We may never know. But according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. an investigation report due out today by a Republican congressional committee, the one-day delay in the reporting of the breach of the levees and federal action was part of an overall ``national failure.'' ``At every level - individual, corporate, philanthropic and governmental - we failed to meet the challenge that was Katrina. In this cautionary tale A cautionary tale is a traditional story told in folklore, to warn its hearer of a danger. There are three essential parts to a cautionary tale, though they can be introduced in a large variety of ways. , all the little pigs built houses of straw,'' the report says. What was particularly disturbing was the inefficient response considering how predictable it was. Experts had been warning for years that a hurricane of this magnitude could breach the levees and flood the below-sea-level city. The administration should have had the foresight to act as many as two days before the hurricane hit, the report says. The criticism in the report, a draft of which was released Sunday, is not new. Former FEMA FEMA, n.pr See Federal Emergency Management Agency. Chief Michael Brown lost his job over the disgraceful hurricane response. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has been soundly slammed for focusing on terrorism and not giving enough attention to emergency disaster planning. Chertoff says that criticism is not true, but still is seeking to improve communication in his department, hire more FEMA experts and to replace outdated disaster systems. That's not all that went tremendously wrong. A report by the General Accounting Office released Monday also found that millions in the so-called expedited disbursed aid to Hurricane Katrina and Rita victims was either misspent mis·spend tr.v. mis·spent , mis·spend·ing, mis·spends To spend improperly or extravagantly; squander: misspent the funds; misspent their youth. or lost to fraud. The GAO investigators found this out firsthand, by applying for aid online with false names and identifications. A copy of an actual $2,000 check one of their fake victims was awarded is included in the report. The GAO also reported that hundreds of thousands of dollars was awarded to applicants with invalid Social Security numbers or to properties that didn't exist. The report's title says it all: ``FEMA's Control Weaknesses Exposed the Government to Significant Fraud and Abuse.'' More reports by a Senate committee and the White House are also examining the federal government's performance during the Hurricane Katrina response and are expected in coming months. It's likely they will only confirm the conclusions drawn by this House report: that the federal government's Katrina response was a national disgrace that must never happen again. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion