Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,539,777 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL MORE OF THE SAME A WHIFF OF SCANDAL EMANATES FROM BELMONT.


IT should come as little surprise that there appears to be yet another conflict of interest conflict of interest n. a situation in which a person has a duty to more than one person or organization, but cannot do justice to the actual or potentially adverse interests of both parties. This includes when an individual's personal interests or concerns are inconsistent with the best for a customer, or when a public official's personal interests are contrary to his/her loyalty to public business. in the Los Angeles Unified School District's handling of the Belmont Learning Center.

Belmont deal-making has long been as toxic and as noxious noxious adj. harmful to health, often referring to nuisances. as the leaky oil field on which the school sits.

The latest potential scandal involves the Eastridge Cos., a Washington, D.C.-based real estate development firm that is bidding for the contract to complete Belmont. Between June and August of this summer, the firm also served as an LAUSD consultant for property acquisition and new school construction in the San Fernando Valley.

Having access to the district's facilities division, while at the same time trying to win a district facilities contract, has the makings of a potential conflict of interest. And in a district with a long history of fraud and abuse, one would think that officials would be careful to safeguard against even the appearance of any possible impropriety.

But LAUSD officials don't seem too worried. Superintendent Roy Romer approved of Eastridge's dual roles, provided that it used different employees for the two jobs (presuming employees of the same company don't speak to each other).

It certainly sounds and looks fishy, but we guess that's to be expected from the LAUSD.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Nov 15, 2001
Words:212
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM AIRLINE SAFETY.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:EDITORIAL RAW DEAL CITY HALL OFFERS THE VALLEY A TAX HIKE AND NOTHING IN RETURN.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Topics:



Related Articles
OUR OPINION; BIG LOSS . . . NO PROBLEM.(Editorial)(Editorial)
OUR OPINION; SAFE & SANE SOLUTION.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL THE COUNCIL'S WRECKING BALL.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL : LET THE PROBE BEGIN; WHY IS GARCETTI SO AFRAID OF BELMONT?(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL : A BIG MISTAKE.(Editorial)(Editorial)
BELMONT, TEST SCORES SYMPTOMS OF `CANCER'.(Viewpoint)
EDITORIAL : NO MODEL TO FOLLOW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
2 SCANDALS DOMINATE THE HEADLINES.(News)
`TAJ MAHAL' ABSENT IN LITERATURE : BOARD PRESIDENT DENIES PROJECT HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC.(News)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles