Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,467,449 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL MEDICARE MADNESS NEW PRESCRIPTION PLAN NEEDS AN EMERGENCY INTERVENTION.


THE Medicare Part D prescription drug plan was supposed to make things better by offering more affordable prescriptions to seniors and people with disabilities.

If the intention was to confuse participants to the point where they couldn't get their essential prescriptions or to frustrate pharmacists, well, then, the program has been a resounding success.

Clearly, that wasn't the intention of the new program that began Jan. 1 to serve about 6 million Americans - about 1 million of them in California. Congress spent about two years crafting this program at the urging of President George W. Bush. But even with all that time, the result was a bureaucratic nightmare that has actually hurt many of those it intended to help.

From one end of the country to the other, tens of thousands of poor seniors and people with disabilities, entitled to Medicaid as well as Medicare, have found they were enrolled in programs that don't cover their essential medications or they are getting stuck with huge drug bills they cannot pay. Things have become so bad that governors in dozens of states - including California - have stepped in with emergency help for participants.

And the federal government ordered the private insurers participating in the program to provide a 30-day supply of medication that a patient was taking before a changeover - from a federally aided state program for the poor - and that prescriptions cost no more than $5 for these poor people.

It's surprising that the federal government would even have to take this step. Where were the controls and safety nets that should have been built into such a comprehensive overhaul?

It's commendable that many governors, including Arnold Schwarzenegger, stepped up and threw a safety line to those caught in the Medicare madness. Last week, Schwarzenegger said the state would pay for life-saving medications if they were held up by the problems with the new program. Commendable - but appalling that this scope of intervention was necessary.

Federal officials counter that there are bound to be glitches with any new program and that many savvy seniors have found the program very beneficial.

They promise that once the bugs are worked out, the program will run well. But there are more than just a few bugs. The program's rules are so complicated that it's hard even for those versed in bureaucratese to understand.

It's clear that, despite the years Congress spent working on it, the new Medicare prescription plan needs its own Rx. It's up to Congress to step in and fix this mess immediately.

COPYRIGHT 2006 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jan 17, 2006
Words:421
Previous Article:EDITORIAL TEST FOR SUCCESS EXIT EXAM BRINGS ACCOUNTABILITY TO HIGH SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:NOT JUST THE GLOBES WERE GOLDEN.(News)
Topics:



Related Articles
Cost shifting.(Brief Article)
Prescription Drug Coverage: What's It to You?(George W. Bush and Al Gore's policies)
[R.sub.X] for Seniors.(Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage Act of 2001)(Statistical Data Included)
Modernizing Medicare: the prescription drug debate. (Washington Insights).
The battle for a prescription drug benefit.(Health Policy Update)
New Medicare-approved prescription drug discount card.
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Local health insurers battle Medicare program woes.
Silver lining: 'co-logo contracts' can help health insurers glide though the clouds enveloping Medicare Part D.(Regulatory/Law)
Medicare drug plans help many.(Commentary)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles