Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,552,870 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL FARE HOAX MTA NEEDS REFORM, NOT HIGHER CHARGES.


Given that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority is entering contract negotiations with its powerful bus drivers and mechanics unions, its latest warning of fare hikes must be taken with an enormous grain of salt. It's not hard to discern a negotiating strategy here: Rally the public to management's side with fears of impending financial doom and rising fares.

Still, scare tactics don't work without some basis in truth, and there's no denying that decades of financial mismanagement are quickly catching up with the MTA.

After all, this is the transit agency that squandered $145 million on a massive, swank headquarters for itself.

It's the agency that blew $4.5 billion on a subway to nowhere.

It's the agency that placed itself under an expensive and burdensome 10-year federal consent decree.

It's an agency that panders to politicians and their pals better than it plans for the region's future.

And it's the agency that's never been able to say no to union demands, no matter how unrealistic.

No wonder, then, that the MTA now stares at a $150 million budget shortfall for the coming financial year.

Even so, talk of fare hikes might make for a good bargaining tactic, but it has no place in the current discussion over the future of mass transit in L.A.

That's because the biggest problem with mass transit in Los Angeles remains lack of ridership. Despite the relative success of the Orange Line, most MTA projects are under-used - a problem that would only be exacerbated were fares to go up.

Before MTA officials even consider raising fares, they need to make better use of the $2.8 billion annual budget they already have.

They should first make some long overdue administrative cuts. They should look at ways to save money after the consent decree mercifully comes to an end. They should make increasing ridership their No. 1 planning priority. And that means they should stop expending time, effort and money on a hare-brained scheme to extend the Red Line to the ocean.

Without a doubt, the MTA has many serious needs. But subsidizing its bloat and scaring off commuters aren't among them.

COPYRIGHT 2006 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Apr 11, 2006
Words:357
Previous Article:EDITORIAL SLOW DOWN BUSTING KIDS AND GRANNIES WON'T MAKE ROAD SAFE.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:SMALL SCHOOLS: MORAL VICTORIES ENOUGH FOR F.P.(Sports)
Topics:



Related Articles
Tunnels to nowhere. (how New York's subway system dug itself into a billion-dollar hole)
PUBLIC FORUM : CLINTON FOES TURN TO EXTRANEOUS DIATRIBES.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Innovate, schminovate! The answer isn't innovation; it's using your current tools better.(Brief Article)
PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
MTA MULLS CUTBACKS IN SECURITY COST AGENCY FACES $112 MILLION DEFICIT.(News)
BATTLE LOOMS ON BUS FARES MTA OFFICIALS SAY EXPIRING COURT DECREE KEEPS PRICE LOW.(News)
Fare's fair?(LABJ forum)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles