Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,772 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL DRIVING DISTRACTIONS CAN MOTHERS AGAINST DUMB DRIVERS BE NEXT?


STUDY after study continues to conclude what people certainly already intuit in·tu·it  
tr.v. in·tu·it·ed, in·tu·it·ing, in·tu·its Usage Problem
To know intuitively.



[Back-formation from intuition.
 on their own: Using a cell phone while driving is a distraction. And distractions equal a road safety hazard.

A new study, however, takes this truism to a questionable point by suggesting that driving while talking (on a cell phone) is more dangerous than driving while drunk.

The study generated a lot of excitement, but it relied on a sample of only 40 people in Utah who were driving on a simulator (1) Software that enables the execution of an application written for a different computer environment. Same as emulator.

(2) Software that models the interactions of hypothetical or real-world objects or business processes.
 while talking on a phone, some driving with the legal limit of alcohol in their body, and some driving without either.

This small a study is hardly conclusive Determinative; beyond dispute or question. That which is conclusive is manifest, clear, or obvious. It is a legal inference made so peremptorily that it cannot be overthrown or contradicted. , and considering that having the legal limit of alcohol in one's body hardly guarantees drunkenness Drunkenness
See also Alcoholism.

Acrasia

self-indulgent in the pleasures of the senses. [Br. Lit.: Faerie Queene]

Admiral of the red

a wine-bibber. [Br.
, it verges on irresponsible and alarmist a·larm·ist  
n.
A person who needlessly alarms or attempts to alarm others, as by inventing or spreading false or exaggerated rumors of impending danger or catastrophe.
.

Still, anything that distracts a driver's attention from driving is a hazard. As such, it is appropriate that society consider and debate whether using a phone behind the wheel should be banned or regulated.

A bill pending in the California Legislature, SB 1613, that would prohibit using a cell phone while driving unless it's hooked up to a hands-free device, is a good place to start.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jul 3, 2006
Words:198
Previous Article:A LIFETIME OF WISDOM.(U)
Next Article:EDITORIAL 10-7, `PAPA ALPHA'.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Topics:



Related Articles
Listen to your nagging voices. (the need for solid opinions)(includes public opinion on the challenges facing editorial writing)(The Masthead...
Car phones jack up risk of collisions. (phone use increases risk of collision by 4.3 times)(Brief Article)
What a long, strange trip its been.(editorial director)
Putting the loss into perspective. (Sept11 The convention that wasn't).(Brief Article)
Driving hazards: the phone factor: many things can distract drivers, but mobile phones are today's focus.
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
Deep thought, hurricanes don't mix: a Louisiana editorialist deals with the chaos of Katrina.(SYMPOSIUM: Editorializing in the face of disaster)
Driven to distraction.(INSIGHT)
Don't waste the privilege.(SYMPOSIUM: Editorializing on international issues)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles