EDITORIAL CLOSE THE LOOPHOLE MONEY ALWAYS FINDS ITS WAY INTO POLS' POCKETS.ALL along, critics of Measure R -- the phony ethics ethics, in philosophy, the study and evaluation of human conduct in the light of moral principles. Moral principles may be viewed either as the standard of conduct that individuals have constructed for themselves or as the body of obligations and duties that a reform initiative that passed in November -- have warned that it would not stop lobbyists from funneling money to politicians. And just four months later, it's clear the critics were right. The real purpose of Measure R wasn't ethics reform. It was giving do-nothing, overpaid o·ver·pay v. o·ver·paid , o·ver·pay·ing, o·ver·pays v.tr. 1. To pay (a party) too much. 2. To pay an amount in excess of (a sum due). v.intr. To pay too much. and over-pampered City Council members a third four-year term. But since relaxing term limits doesn't play well with voters, the politicians bundled it with changes in campaign fundraising
It was a sham False; without substance. A sham Pleading is one that is good in form but is so clearly false in fact that it does not raise any genuine issue. , but the city Ethics Commission In the United States, an Ethics Commission is a commission established by State law to discourage dishonest practices by their public employees and elected officials. Almost all American states have such a commission. was deliberately cut out of the debate to put the measure on the ballot, so the full extent of the sham was never made clear to the public before the vote. Now we know. For all that Measure R purported pur·port·ed adj. Assumed to be such; supposed: the purported author of the story. pur·port ed·ly adv. to do, it didn't close the
loophole An omission or Ambiguity in a legal document that allows the intent of the document to be evaded.Loopholes come into being through the passage of statutes, the enactment of regulations, the drafting of contracts or the decisions of courts. that allows lobbyists to hold fundraisers for politicians and pressure other people to donate money to them. Over the past three years, for example, lobbyist fundraisers have raised about $1 million for L.A.'s elected officials, nearly half of that last year. Politicians are so rolling in the cash that a number of the council members who ran for re-election in last week's election raised hundreds of thousands of dollars -- even though they faced no competition. Clearly, we're never going to separate politics and money. But the City Council owes it to the public to make good on its Measure R promises. Last week, the Ethics Commission began a series of workshops that will review the lobbyists rules and reforms of Measure R. We encourage commissioners to do what the elected officials never will -- craft real reform to clean up City Hall corruption. The problem, of course, isn't really the lobbyists, contractors and other special interests. They're doing what they're supposed to do: Look after their own or their clients' interests. The problem is the politicians whose job it is to look after the public interest. And one of these days, the public will get fed up with their failure to do just that and replace them with people who will do the job they were elected to do. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

ed·ly adv.
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion