Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,679 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL CANCEL THE ELECTION? NOV. 8 VOTE KEEPS ALIVE CHANCE OF MEANINGFUL REFORM IN SACRAMENTO.


WHEN a judge ruled earlier this month that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's legislative redistricting redistricting: see legislative apportionment.  plan could not go on the ballot for November's special election, the usual suspects immediately began clamoring clam·or  
n.
1. A loud outcry; a hubbub.

2. A vehement expression of discontent or protest: a clamor in the press for pollution control.

3. A loud sustained noise.
 for the status quo [Latin, The existing state of things at any given date.] Status quo ante bellum means the state of things before the war. The status quo to be preserved by a preliminary injunction is the last actual, peaceable, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy. . Special interests across the state cried out in unison u·ni·son  
n.
1. Music
a. Identity of pitch; the interval of a perfect prime.

b. The combination of parts at the same pitch or in octaves.

2.
, ``Cancel the special election!''

But hold on.

For all of Schwarzenegger's self-inflicted setbacks, the hope for reform in California California (kăl'ĭfôr`nyə), most populous state in the United States, located in the Far West; bordered by Oregon (N), Nevada and, across the Colorado River, Arizona (E), Mexico (S), and the Pacific Ocean (W).  is far from dead.

For starters, the state's 3rd District Court of Appeal has stayed the lower court's ruling striking the redistricting measure from the ballot. And there's still a chance the court will decide to let Californians vote on the measure after all.

Then there's the question of whether state leaders could cancel the special election even if they wanted to.

There is no precedent for such an action. The California Legislature would have to pass - and the governor would have to sign - emergency legislation that would surely be challenged by the various advocacy groups that are already mounting campaigns on behalf of their pet initiatives.

For all the hand-wringing over the $50 million a special election would cost, no one has begun to figure how much fending off all the lawsuits and appeals might cost.

But apart from the practical arguments for proceeding with the special election, there's also the hope that true reform can be achieved.

Already on the ballot are measures governing gov·ern  
v. gov·erned, gov·ern·ing, gov·erns

v.tr.
1. To make and administer the public policy and affairs of; exercise sovereign authority in.

2.
 teacher tenure and limiting state spending - valuable reforms in their own right.

And in addition to these measures is the more promising prospect that the governor and the Legislature may still craft a bipartisan reform agenda - a prospect the special election makes far more likely.

That's because Schwarzenegger has one powerful weapon left in his political arsenal: Proposition 75, which would require public-employee unions to obtain members' permission before spending union dues on political campaigns. The unions dread the measure and, by extension, so do Sacramento's Democrats.

So far, Schwarzenegger has not yet taken a position on Proposition 75, making it the ultimate political bargaining chip bar·gain·ing chip
n.
Something, especially an inducement or concession, used as leverage in negotiations: "A bargaining chip is ultimately worthless if you're not willing to bargain it away" 
. As long as he can credibly cred·i·ble  
adj.
1. Capable of being believed; plausible. See Synonyms at plausible.

2. Worthy of confidence; reliable.
 threaten one of the Democrats' prime sources of campaign funding, Democrats will have to deal with him.

So let's hold off on this talk of canceling the special election. The political and legal wrangling in Sacramento is still ongoing, and California's voters could still end up the winners.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jul 31, 2005
Words:388
Previous Article:EDITORIAL PEOPLE POWER.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:HISTORIC PARALLEL MUSLIM INSURGENCY AKIN TO BOXER REBELLION.(Viewpoint)



Related Articles
Prevent endorsement burnout by planning.(Brief Article)
Winston Robles challenges us.(Panamian journalist)(Brief Article)
Election mess gives students education.(Brief Article)
Center of the storm: history, lunacy.(Brief Article)
Board should have honored the precinct's nominations.(Editorials)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Come to Sacramento in 2008 or Arnold will rip your spine out.(2008 CONVENTION BID)(Arnold Schwarzenegger)
A thousand words: editorials in pictures.(SHOP TALK: Innovations)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles