Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,479,663 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL BAD TASTE AWARD BOMBLIKE HOAXES A POOR CHOICE IN POST-9-11 WORLD.


TWO media companies are likely to be fined big bucks for exercising extremely poor taste.

Furious Boston officials are seeking legal action legal action n. any lawsuit, petition or prosecution. against Time Warner, the parent company of Turner Broadcasting System, which is responsible for placing 38 small, battery-powered light screens in public spaces and bringing the city to its knees Wednesday.

How much the scare cost is still to be determined, as it will take some time to tally the price of closing bridges and shutting down roads and the subway for a day.

The Los Angeles Times and Paramount Pictures also face legal action after a dud DUD - Detailed Urban Design (Guidelines)
DUD - Drag Utan Drog (No-drugs cultural organization, Sweden)
DUD - Dunedin, New Zealand - Momona (Airport Code)
 of a marketing gimmick in May for ``Mission: Impossible III'' caused several members of the public to think bombs had been placed inside newspaper boxes.

What were they thinking?

In the post-Sept. 11 era of hypersensitivity antibody-mediated hypersensitivity 
1. type II h.; see Gell and Coombs classification, under classification.
2. occasionally, any form of hypersensitivity in which antibodies, rather than T lymphocytes, are the primary mediators, i.e., types I–III.
cell-mediated hypersensitivity  type IV h. to the very real threat of terrorist attacks, that kind of marketing is beyond just poor taste. It is criminal, and Wednesday's ploy in Boston was all the worse in a city deeply scarred as the origination spot for two planes that flew into the World Trade towers that horrible day.

The companies responsible should have to pay the full costs that the public agencies spent to respond to their foolish stunts.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Feb 2, 2007
Words:208
Previous Article:EDITORIAL SOLD OUT CITY LEADERS BETRAY L.A. TAXPAYERS IN LIVING-WAGE DEAL.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the editor)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pulitzer Prize Editorials: America's Best Editorial Writing, 1917-1993.
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Columnists fired for criticism: Opinion writers roasted for expressing... opinions. (Symposium Terrorism and civil liberties).(Brief Article)
Idaho conference focuses on wartime comment.
Kinsley should be applauded for his interactive initiative: and the L.A. Times is far from alone in changing the world of opinions as we know...
Media ambivalent about Supreme Court ruling.
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
New officers, rule changes ... the convention gets a workout.(CONVENTION 2006)
A hunger for engagement with a changing world: aging ink-stained wretches? Guilty. out of touch with a transforming industry? Look again.(SHOP...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles