Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,537,391 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL AMERICA'S VALUES U.S. SENATE LAYS DOWN LAW ON TORTURE.


IN a 90-9 vote, the U.S. Senate has taken a stand on the issue of torture in regards to those detained and imprisoned im·pris·on  
tr.v. im·pris·oned, im·pris·on·ing, im·pris·ons
To put in or as if in prison; confine.



[Middle English emprisonen, from Old French emprisoner : en-
 as part of the War on Terror This article is about U.S. actions, and those of other states, after September 11, 2001. For other conflicts, see Terrorism.

The War on Terror (also known as the War on Terrorism
.

In approving a spending bill that allocates $440 billion more to the effort to fight terrorists, senators tucked in an amendment prohibiting the use of torture against those detained and questioned by the U.S. military.

This wasn't some passive-aggressive trick by Senate Democrats to tank the spending bill, but rather a bipartisan effort to set clear rules so that the inhumane in·hu·mane  
adj.
Lacking pity or compassion.



inhu·manely adv.
 treatment of prisoners documented at Abu Ghraib See Abu Ghraib prison and Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse.
The city of Abu Ghraib (BGN/PCGN romanization: Abū Ghurayb; أبو غريب in Arabic) in the Anbar Governorate of Iraq is located 32 kilometres (20 mi) west of
 and Guantanamo Bay doesn't happen again.

The amendment, co-sponsored by ex-POW Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and conservative Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S R-S Reed-Solomon
R-S Reset-Set
R-S Relative Severity
.C., prohibits ``cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment'' and sets up clear rules and punishment for the military to follow regarding war prisoners.

The U.S. Senate took a courageous stand last week. Unfortunately, the White House threatened to veto the bill and went to work to try to keep it from making the final cut in conference committee.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Oct 9, 2005
Words:181
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM.(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)(Editorial)
Next Article:EDITORIAL SQUANDERING GOOD WILL PUBLIC-EMPLOYEE UNIONS NEED TO LOOK OUT FOR PUBLIC INTEREST.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
Reject Gonzales as A.G.(Editorials)(Confirmation would undermine U.S. credibility)(Editorial)
Where's the outrage?(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
A tortured debate: the media-fed hysteria over the treatment of terrorist prisoners.
A blue state newspaper endorses George Bush.
Roberts deserves a fair hearing.(Commentary)
Cheney's dirty secret.(Editorials)(His proposal allows the CIA to torture prisoners)(Editorial)
Dodging the costs of the warfare state.(MEDIA BEAT)
Too soon to celebrate.(Editorials)(Work remains to be done on detainees' rights)(Editorial)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles