EDITORIAL A $437 MILLION QUESTION WHY DOES IT COST SO MUCH MORE FOR LAPD HQ?ON one side of the city, a new police station is being built for $37 million.When it is done next year, the new 54,000-square-foot Canoga Park station will help the Los Angeles Police Department "LAPD" and "L.A.P.D." redirect here. For other uses, see LAPD (disambiguation). San Fernando (săn fərnăn`dō), city (1991 pop. 144,761), Buenos Aires prov., E Argentina. It is a district administrative center in the Greater Buenos Aires area. Valley's 1.3 million people and improve the time it takes to respond to calls for service. On the other side of the city, another new police building is being raised -- but with a $437 million price tag (at least for now). It's the new LAPD 1. LAPD - Link Access Procedure on the D channel. 2. LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department. administrative headquarters downtown to replace the aging Parker Center Parker Center is the headquarters for the Los Angeles Police Department, and is located in Downtown LA. It is named for former LAPD chief William H. Parker. Originally with the prosaic name, the Police Administration Building, ground for the center was broken on December 30, 1952 . And when it is completed next year, it will serve as the department's HQ with nice new offices in a tony downtown location. So what's with the $400 million difference? Good question. Well, to be sure, the downtown administration building will be larger and on more expensive land. But if that doesn't seem to explain the discrepancy, take solace in knowing that it doesn't satisfy City Controller Laura Chick either. Chick is launching an audit of the construction of the new police headquarters building to make sure that the $437 million isn't being misspent mis·spend tr.v. mis·spent , mis·spend·ing, mis·spends To spend improperly or extravagantly; squander: misspent the funds; misspent their youth. . It's time It's Time was a successful political campaign run by the Australian Labor Party (ALP) under Gough Whitlam at the 1972 election in Australia. Campaigning on the perceived need for change after 23 years of conservative (Liberal Party of Australia) government, Labor put forward a someone took a hard look at the project and why the price tag is so high. Costs have skyrocketed from the $150 million figure tossed around in the conceptual stage, to the $200 million at the inception of the project. Then suddenly, it jumped to nearly $300 million. Then came the current forecast of $437 million with an expansion of the project. The cost inflation of this project definitely warrants some tough questions and thorough examination by Chick's office -- before the price tag soars to more than half a billion. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion