Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,479,661 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : SENSELESS IN SEATTLE; WHAT ARE GLOBAL ECONOMY PROTESTERS REALLY AFRAID OF?


WHAT on earth does the World Trade Organization do that could prompt such an ugly and out-of-control protest that rocked Seattle this week and brought back memories of the 1960s anti-war demonstrations?

Protesters claim the organization, whose 134 member-nations set the rules for global trade, allows big business and giant multinational corporations to pillage and plunder the weak, the poor and the innocent, sacrifice the environment and exploit children.

Environmental problems and lack of civilized labor protections are real issues that will only be solved over time as the global economy brings wealth to the poor and raises expectations around the world.

So we ask: What are protesters really protecting?

The WTO seeks to bolster the world's economy, and so enhance the wealth of nations and their citizens by fostering international trade. The jobs created in the poorest nations are better than the jobs that exist.

What's so terrible about that?

Not a thing.

The real puppeteers of Tuesday's dangerous charade charade (shərād`), verbal, written, or acted representation of a word, its syllables, or a number of words. The object is to guess the idea being conveyed. Winthrop M. Praed wrote many of the well-known charades, and a good description of the acted charade is found in Thackeray's Vanity Fair. were the union leaders who are trying to protect the wages and benefits of their workers without regard to that old union ideal of solidarity of all working people.

Just as they opposed reducing trade barriers with Mexico, they argue that free trade globally will somehow hurt Americans as industry expands in other countries.

Clearly, that's true in some cases where products can be made cheaper elsewhere, but increased trade creates many other new jobs. That's why unemployment in the United States at a record low. That's why is the American economy is enjoying robust health.

For every example of child labor child labor, use of the young as workers in factories, farms, and mines. Child labor was first recognized as a social problem with the introduction of the factory system in late 18th-century Great Britain. Children had formerly been apprenticed (see apprenticeship) or had worked in the family, but in the factory their employment soon constituted virtual slavery, especially among British orphans. This was mitigated by acts of Parliament in 1802 and later. and sweatshops, there are dozens of others where people in Third World countries are earning more and having better lives thanks to the global economy.

Free and fair trade leads to a healthier economy. And as we've plainly witnessed in this country, a vibrant economy helps build prosperity and well-being for more people and at a faster rate than any government-intervention program.

So we ask again: What are the Seattle protesters really fighting about?

Of course, they are fighting for themselves - not the exploited children of Bangladesh. And that is their right if they are honest about it.

Organized labor wants to protect its gains, not promote the general welfare of the rest of the world.

Labor doesn't want to share the wealth, it wants to stop the unstoppable process of creating a true global economy that interconnects all people and all nations.

Rather than the progressives they want to be seen as, they are in fact reactionaries fighting against the winds of change.

The WTO and its members certainly need nudging toward reforming policies that allow for more, not less, free trade. But that will come through serious discussion, not at the hands of street performers looking to hide their real agendas.
COPYRIGHT 1999 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Dec 2, 1999
Words:466
Previous Article:EDITORIAL : NO MODEL TO FOLLOW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Next Article:PUBLIC FORUM : WORKING LONGER.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
Editorials: not just for policy wonks.
You're a WHAT? Getting used to the job title takes a while.(The Nontraditional Editorialist)(editorial writer)
When the publisher becomes a political activist.
The WTO is coming! The WTO is coming!(Brief Article)
Seattle offers slew of attractions.(Brief Article)
To the Editors.
New giving: A taste of Seattle.(Brief Article)
Globalization is not a new story.
PUBLIC FORUM : TYRANNY AND TRADE.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Ink think: Michael Kinsley, L.A. Times opinion editor, sees changes in the role that newspapers have traditionally played in shaping the public...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles