Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,480,151 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : PULLING A FAST ONE? LAUSD IS TAKING ANOTHER STAB AT GETTING AROUND PROPOSITION 227.


THE Los Angeles school board's request for permission to exempt 34 schools from the rules imposed by Proposition 227 is highly suspect and shouldn't be taken at face value.

The district has shown that it will do anything to avoid implementing the voter-approved English-only education rules, and there has to be a certain amount of skepticism over whether this is just another attempt to get around them.

The district is asking for blanket waivers from Proposition 227 at 34 schools, a fraction of the campuses in the vast district. The waivers would allow students to enroll in dual-language or bilingual programs that school officials claim have thus far proved effective at teaching students English quickly at these schools.

With the Los Angeles Unified School District mainstreaming just 8 percent of Spanish-speaking students into regular classes each year, we wonder why the bilingual programs at these schools were not implemented districtwide if they were so successful.

There is some evidence already that district officials have fudged the numbers in claiming all 34 schools are successfully teaching English using bilingual programs.

Allen Sussman, principal at Napa Street Elementary in Northridge, did not ask to be exempted but found his school on the list of 34. He said parents have signed their kids up for one of two English-immersion classes.

``They lumped all 34 schools together, but there's a number of us that do not want to be included in this blanket waiver,'' Sussman said.

We can't help but wonder whether this is just another case of the LAUSD board members putting their ideology above the law, and above the interests of their students.

The state Board of Education believes the law is clear on the subject of waivers: It can be done on a child-by-child basis. Proposition 227 allows for some leeway but only on a case-by-case basis.

We think there should be some leeway if the LAUSD can prove convincingly and with honest numbers that each of these 34 schools integrated students successfully using bilingual programs. Frankly, that's unlikely given the response of principals like Sussman and the LAUSD's dismal track record.

COPYRIGHT 1998 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Sep 28, 1998
Words:351
Previous Article:BRIEFLY : TWO GUNMEN IN CAR WOUND 3 IN SPREE.(News)
Next Article:EDITORIAL : PLANNING FOR THE PEOPLE; LOCAL PANELS WOULD RETURN LAND-USE POWERS TONEIGHBORHOODS.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
PUBLIC FORUM : WARNINGS OF CHANNEL HAZARDS UNHEEDED.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
LAUSD SAYS UNZ MEASURE WILL HURT KIDS.(News)
PUBLIC FORUM : HIT-RUN SHOOTOUT SHOWS NEED FOR GUN CURBS.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
PUBLIC FORUM : PROP. 13 HELPS SENIORS KEEP THEIR HOMES.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
DISTRICT DOING ITS PART TO KEEP SCHOOLS COOL.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
LAUSD TRAINING PLAN UNDER FIRE; PROP. 227 SPENDING CHALLENGED.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
GROUPS FILE SUIT TO DELAY LAUSD.(NEWS)
PUBLIC FORUM : COUNCIL CRITICIZED FOR PROP. 227 ACTION.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
ENGLISH IMMERSION WAIVERS FEW; ABOUT 11% TRY TO EXIT PROGRAM.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
BOOK DEFICIT HITS LOWER GRADE LEVELS.(News)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles