Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,479,661 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : PRICEY PUBLIC SERVANTS; L.A. PAYS TOP DOLLAR FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.


THIS is Day 4 of the long list the Daily News is printing in installments showing the 1,701 Los Angeles public employees and officials with $100,000-a-year salaries or more.

The salaries are public information. We are printing the data to shed light on the darkness of how local government works and how much it spends.

The six-figure public employees are numerous and, although some may be worth it, a Daily News survey shows that other large cities and counties typically pay far less than Los Angeles for their top officials.

In addition, other large local governments in the United States increasingly are going to a pay-for-performance plan for their top executives. That's not the case in L.A.

Neither performance, benchmark studies nor nationwide salary standards are used often in Los Angeles to set six-figure and higher salaries for local bureaucrats.

Without such yardsticks, how are decision makers and the public supposed to know if the fat cats are worth their pay?

Public employees often have a great deal: good pay, very little chance of losing their jobs even for incompetence, and rock-solid retirement benefits.

Taxpayers who get smaller paychecks for private-sector jobs without such security, and who underwrite local government, will wonder why they're paying so much to provide a better deal for others than they get. Good question.

COPYRIGHT 1997 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Dec 17, 1997
Words:222
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM : CLINTON'S CRITICS ARE `PARTISAN HYPOCRITES'.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:EDITORIAL : RETHINKING SHELTERS; NATIONAL GUARD ARMORIES AREN'T PERMANENT SOLUTION FOR HOMELESS.(Editorial)(Editorial)



Related Articles
Two unions striving to organize L.A. Times editorial, mail staffs. (Graphic Communications International Union; Teamster)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
OUR OPINION; GOVERNMENT FOR THE PEOPLE MEANS HONEST AND RESPONSIVE ELECTED OFFICIALS.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
PUBLIC FORUM : YEAR OF SURPLUS IS NO TIME FOR A TAX HIKE.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
PUBLIC FORUM : READERS PRAISE, DENOUNCE PAY HIKE FOR CITY WORKERS.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
EDITORIAL : FAT CAT BUREAUCRATS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GET SIX-FIGURE SALARIES.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Idaho conference focuses on wartime comment.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles