Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,717,274 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : NUCLEAR MADNESS; PAKISTAN RAISES THE STAKES BY CONDUCTING TESTS OF ITS OWN.


MADNESS. That's the best word we can think of to describe India's decision earlier this month to conduct underground nuclear tests

Main article: Nuclear testing
The following is a list of nuclear test series designations, organized first by country and then by date. For more information on countries with nuclear weapons, see List of countries with nuclear weapons.
.

The same word applies to the response by Pakistan, India's longtime enemy, to conduct nuclear tests of its own. Pakistan, with a per capita income Noun 1. per capita income - the total national income divided by the number of people in the nation
income - the financial gain (earned or unearned) accruing over a given period of time
 of approximately $2,100 a year, can no more afford a nuclear buildup than India, where the per capita income is even less - about $1,500 a year.

But crying over spilled milk won't accomplish anything. The challenge now for President Clinton and other world leaders For a list of heads of state, see .
World leaders is a MMORPG. The game involves creating a state, joining an alliance and going into war. It is mostly played by players from Israel, China, USA, Britain, Brazil and Saudi-Arabia.
 is to find a way to prevent the crisis from escalating.

That won't be easy. Since neither side was deterred by unilateral economic sanctions by the United States, other steps must be taken. One possibility is to secure the cooperation of all the major powers, including China, to avoid doing anything to strengthen either side.

Another is to encourage India and Pakistan to follow the example set by the United States and the former Soviet Union and explore the concept of detente dé·tente  
n.
1. A relaxing or easing, as of tension between rivals.

2. A policy toward a rival nation or bloc characterized by increased diplomatic, commercial, and cultural contact and a desire to reduce tensions, as through
 as a means of averting a mutually disastrous nuclear holocaust.

Neither India nor Pakistan, which fought three wars during the past 50 years, felt an urgent need to negotiate when they confronted each other with conventional arms. That should change now that they are facing the threat of war involving the use of weapons of mass destruction Weapons that are capable of a high order of destruction and/or of being used in such a manner as to destroy large numbers of people. Weapons of mass destruction can be high explosives or nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological weapons, but exclude the means of transporting or .
COPYRIGHT 1998 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:May 29, 1998
Words:231
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM : MICROSOFT A VICTIM OF `RESENTFUL MENTALITY'.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:DEATH THROWS ACTING PROJECTS IN DOUBT.(News)



Related Articles
Empty promises? (progress in nuclear nonproliferation)(War - Nuclear Weapons)
The return of nuclear terror.(India and Pakistan nuclear tests)(Editorial)
Let the United States first cast out the beam from its own eye. (U.S. nuclear weapons impose greater risks on the international community than those...
20-minute peace workout: nuclear weapons in South Asia.
How should the international community respond: India and Pakistan's nuclear tests.
It's India's turn.(Editorials)(Pakistan needs partner in defusing crisis)(Editorial)
INDIA RESUMES NUCLEAR TESTS, INFURIATES WORLD.(News)
PAKISTAN CONDUCTS SEVERAL NUCLEAR TESTS U.S. ORDERS SANCTIONS TO CHASTISE PAKISTAN.(News)
EDITORIAL\Another flip-flop\Clinton administration plays politics in stalling the Ward Valley\nuclear disposal site.(Editorial)(Editorial)
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles