EDITORIAL : NUCLEAR MADNESS; PAKISTAN RAISES THE STAKES BY CONDUCTING TESTS OF ITS OWN.MADNESS. That's the best word we can think of to describe India's decision earlier this month to conduct underground nuclear tests
The same word applies to the response by Pakistan, India's longtime enemy, to conduct nuclear tests of its own. Pakistan, with a per capita income Noun 1. per capita income - the total national income divided by the number of people in the nation income - the financial gain (earned or unearned) accruing over a given period of time of approximately $2,100 a year, can no more afford a nuclear buildup than India, where the per capita income is even less - about $1,500 a year. But crying over spilled milk won't accomplish anything. The challenge now for President Clinton and other world leaders For a list of heads of state, see . World leaders is a MMORPG. The game involves creating a state, joining an alliance and going into war. It is mostly played by players from Israel, China, USA, Britain, Brazil and Saudi-Arabia. is to find a way to prevent the crisis from escalating. That won't be easy. Since neither side was deterred by unilateral economic sanctions by the United States, other steps must be taken. One possibility is to secure the cooperation of all the major powers, including China, to avoid doing anything to strengthen either side. Another is to encourage India and Pakistan to follow the example set by the United States and the former Soviet Union and explore the concept of detente dé·tente n. 1. A relaxing or easing, as of tension between rivals. 2. A policy toward a rival nation or bloc characterized by increased diplomatic, commercial, and cultural contact and a desire to reduce tensions, as through as a means of averting a mutually disastrous nuclear holocaust. Neither India nor Pakistan, which fought three wars during the past 50 years, felt an urgent need to negotiate when they confronted each other with conventional arms. That should change now that they are facing the threat of war involving the use of weapons of mass destruction Weapons that are capable of a high order of destruction and/or of being used in such a manner as to destroy large numbers of people. Weapons of mass destruction can be high explosives or nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological weapons, but exclude the means of transporting or . |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion