Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,879 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

EDITORIAL : JUST SAY NO CITY SHOULDN'T RELAX RULE AGAINST ALLOWING FORMER DRUG USERS TO JOIN THE LAPD.


THE city of Los Angeles
For the city, see Los Angeles, California.
The City of Los Angeles was a streamlined passenger train jointly operated by the Chicago and North Western Railway and the Union Pacific Railroad.
 would send the community in general and young people in particular the worst possible message if it lowered standards and allowed former drug users to become police officers.

Therefore, the city Personnel Department should immediately drop its recommendation that applicants seeking to become sworn LAPD 1. LAPD - Link Access Procedure on the D channel.
2. LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department.
 officers should not be eliminated from consideration if they admit on their application that they have experimented with hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

``Such changes would permit LAPD to consider selection of otherwise exemplary individuals who have experimented with hard narcotics narcotics n. 1) techinically, drugs which dull the senses. 2) a popular generic term for drugs which cannot be legally possessed, sold, or transported except for medicinal uses for which a physician or dentist's prescription is required. ,'' said the report prepared by acting Personnel Department Director Jurutha Brown. ``The key concept here is `experimental' use.''

But the policy does not clearly define ``experimental.'' A person with a serious heroin or cocaine problem who never was convicted could qualify under the new proposed policy.

And even if the policy did spell out just one-time use, the commission has not made the case that hundreds of otherwise qualified, worthy people are being rejected as police officers because of this ban. The report notes that of 1,345 applicants to the Los Angeles Police Department "LAPD" and "L.A.P.D." redirect here. For other uses, see LAPD (disambiguation).

This article or section is written like an .
 in 1995, there were only 157 disqualified dis·qual·i·fy  
tr.v. dis·qual·i·fied, dis·qual·i·fy·ing, dis·qual·i·fies
1.
a. To render unqualified or unfit.

b. To declare unqualified or ineligible.

2.
 for past drug use.

Certainly there are dedicated, qualified and sincerely repentant re·pen·tant  
adj.
Characterized by or demonstrating repentance; penitent.



re·pentant·ly adv.

Adj. 1.
 people who tried drugs, decided it was wrong and want to serve their community. We believe there are better ways - including drug prevention and treatment work - that are just as important and more appropriate than serving as law enforcement officers.

We agree with the Los Angeles Police Protective League, which strongly opposes the proposed change because of its impact on the department and the message it sends.

``Across the nation, we have this policy of zero tolerance The policy of applying laws or penalties to even minor infringements of a code in order to reinforce its overall importance and enhance deterrence.

Since the 1980s the phrase zero tolerance has signified a philosophy toward illegal conduct that favors strict imposition of
, and now we would be saying it's OK to have used drugs,'' said Dennis Zine, a Police Protective League director. ``All these years, we've been saying to young people in the DARE program and in speeches that if you want to become a Los Angeles police officer, don't use drugs.''

At a time when studies show that drug use is increasing substantially among young people and the forces in favor of eliminating or weakening many anti-drug laws have been emboldened em·bold·en  
tr.v. em·bold·ened, em·bold·en·ing, em·bold·ens
To foster boldness or courage in; encourage. See Synonyms at encourage.

Adj. 1.
 by the passage of Proposition 215, which legalized in a loose way the medical use of marijuana, lifting the ban would send a dangerous message that there are no consequences from using drugs.

Our advice to the Civil Service Commission: Just say no.
COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Dec 15, 1996
Words:407
Previous Article:PUBLIC FORUM : SUPPORTER OF CSUN MARKET CENTER REBUTTED.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:EDITORIAL : TV RATINGS BOMB INDUSTRY SHOULD HEED CALLS FOR MORE DETAILED GUIDELINES.(EDITORIAL)(Editorial)



Related Articles
FCC rules give pause to advocacy.(Brief Article)
Hechinger seminar inspires.(educational standards)(Brief Article)
PUBLIC FORUM : SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION DESERVE BLAME FOR SCORES.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
PUBLIC FORUM : HOLDEN: EDITORIAL `UNFAIRLY ATTACKED ME'.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
PUBLIC FORUM : READERS SUPPORT DRUG BAN IN LAPD HIRING.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL WEEK IN REVIEW.(Editorial)(Editorial)
LAPD AGAIN OPEN TO 21, OLDER DEPARTMENT SETTLES CLAIM, RESCINDS AGE LIMIT.(News)
PUBLIC FORUM BONUSES?(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the editor)
EDITORIAL LOWERED STANDARDS LAPD'S LOOSENED RULE ON DRUG USE BY RECRUITS MAKES SENSE.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles